I have it as 15-10. Just like Sherrill being 67-48-2.
Sherrill was 67 and 48 ???? Whaaaa?I have it as 15-10. Just like Sherrill being 67-48-2.
He has a massive coaching tree and his concepts have permeated every level of football. If he is not HOF, then they need to shut it down…How crazy is it that Leach might not get into the HOF because of his .598 winning %?
I have it as 15-10. Just like Sherrill being 67-48-2.
You cannot tell the story of college football without Mike Leach.He has a massive coaching tree and his concepts have permeated every level of football. If he is not HOF, then they need to shut it down…
Exactly. If he does get in then you close the place down because it has no meaning.He has a massive coaching tree and his concepts have permeated every level of football. If he is not HOF, then they need to shut it down…
There's their way around the requirement. Don't count the COVID year as not all teams participated.For those that are interested:
Texas Tech without Leach: .538 winning percentage
Texas Tech with Leach: .664 winning percentage
Washington State without Leach: .495 winning percentage
Washington State with Leach: .539 winning percentage
Mississippi State without Leach: .494 winning percentage
Mississippi State with Leach: .528 winning percentage*
* - This includes the COVID year. He's at .600 without the COVID year at MSU
I think it's safe to say he was a pretty good coach.
Strategic elimination of outliers.I have it as 15-10. Just like Sherrill being 67-48-2.
If you don't count Covid year, where is he? That could be a loophole.How crazy is it that Leach might not get into the HOF because of his .598 winning %?