Minoritized?

Roar More

Well-known member
Oct 30, 2021
439
852
93
What the heck does that mean?

Trustees committee discusses retention, graduation rates of minoritized students​

Dec. 15 panel explored strategies aimed at closing gaps in retention and graduation rates between underrepresented students and overall student population​

A diverse group of students in a Penn State classroom

The Penn State Board of Trustees Committee on Academic Affairs, Research and Student Life recently discussed increasing gaps in retention and graduation rates between underrepresented minority (URM) students and the overall student population – and opportunities and strategies for the University to address them. Credit: Penn State. Creative Commons
EXPAND
DECEMBER 18, 2022

UNIVERSITY PARK, Pa. – The Penn State Board of Trustees Committee on Academic Affairs, Research and Student Life discussed increasing gaps in retention and graduation rates between underrepresented minority (URM) students and the overall student population – and opportunities and strategies for the University to address them – at its meeting on Dec. 15.
Committee members examined data highlighting trends at Penn State and nationally. University Park’s overall six-year graduation rate of 84.6% far surpasses the national rate of 68% as measured across all public four-year institutions. However, there is a 12% gap between underrepresented and white students at the University Park campus and a nearly 18% gap between these same populations across the entire University. The rates for one-year retention and four-year graduation, for which data can be found at the University’s Data Digest website, follow similar trends.
Steve Wagman, chair of the committee, opened the meeting by reiterating the commitment of Penn State President Neeli Bendapudi to both enhancing recruitment of underrepresented students and closing the four- and six-year graduation rates for students across all backgrounds and identities.
“Her (Bendapudi’s) priorities include enhancing support for underrepresented students throughout their academic careers to not only increase graduation rates, but also to set students up for lifelong success,” said Wagner. “In order to assess our progress in these areas, we first need to understand our baseline. The goal for today’s session is to illuminate the challenge before us, to identify the programs, services and resources that are having an impact and to identify the gaps we need to close.”
A panel of administrators, staff and students examined existing initiatives and resources focused on diversity, equity, inclusion and belonging (DEIB) at the University. They discussed opportunities to further enhance the offerings or potential new solutions to help narrow the gaps.
“How do we as an institution put barriers in students’ ways? And how can we actively identify those and work to eliminate them? So, really trying to get people to make this shift,” said Yvonne Gaudelius, vice president and dean for undergraduate education. “You can see this starting to happen in a lot of the policies and procedures that are being written to really try to change that emphasis and put the onus on us.”
The Office of Undergraduate Education continues to lead a number of collaborative initiatives – including the Division of Undergraduate Studies (DUS), an enrollment unit for first- and second-year students who are undecided, exploratory or shifting direction; the Student Success Center, which launched in 2019 to support undergraduate students who experience barriers to persistent and timely degree completion; and the Summer Success Scholarship program, which since 2019 has awarded approximately $4.4 million to approximately 2,200 students across the institution who have fallen behind in degree progress, would benefit from a summer course to catch up, and have financial challenges in doing so; among others.
The efforts led by these initiatives aim to improve the undergraduate educational experience for all students but also represent specific, timely and targeted interventions that should help in closing opportunity gaps.
“How can we get out there and create a space where we’re giving information, but more importantly, create a culture that students feel connected to and feel invited to continue to engage in?” asked Denise Poole, director of student success initiatives in the Office of Undergraduate Education.
Student panelists shared their experiences as underrepresented minority students. They especially noted that earlier and more frequent access to information about DEIB-related resources and services would be beneficial to students who are currently struggling or are at risk of struggling.
“Coming into my senior year I’ve learned a lot more about the different resources that can help me at Penn State, and I feel as though if I knew that a little bit sooner in my freshman year, it could have better helped me and prepared me during my college career,” said Caitlin Bertrand, a senior in the Smeal College of Business. “(There is an opportunity for) advertising and putting it out there for students to know exactly the different opportunities that they do, what their outcomes could be, and what they can get from it overall.”
Re’naijah Purvis, a senior at Penn State Abington who serves as a Lion Guide peer adviser and a resident assistant in the University’s first living learning community focused on global sustainability, said that underrepresented students who are struggling may feel more comfortable turning to a fellow student than approaching a faculty or staff member, which they may find intimidating. She suggested peer-to-peer outreach as a possible solution.
“Many students who are first-gen and who are underrepresented don’t really feel like they have the voice or the space to advocate for themselves,” said Purvis.
Melissa Landrau Vega, director of the Multicultural Resource Center at University Park, which provides individual college counseling and educational services for undergraduate students from diverse backgrounds, agreed that engaging students one-on-one and in smaller groups, in addition to continued broader promotion at larger involvement fairs and new-student orientation activities, could be effective in reaching underrepresented minority students earlier and throughout their time at Penn State.
“We’re always working with our Student Leadership Council to devise ways in which to engage with students to make sure that the students know where we are, what services we can provide and that we can listen to their needs and see how we can connect them to the right resources and services,” said Landrau Vega.
 

BobPSU92

Well-known member
Oct 12, 2021
17,255
26,125
113
Minoritized. Does this mean that they aren’t inherently minorities and that “we” have made them minorities? Blame whitey?

o_O
 
Last edited:

Karl_Havok

Well-known member
Oct 6, 2021
3,180
6,460
113
I think it's self explanatory based on the title. I read the article and it explains it in more detail, though.

For those who don't want to read the article I'll explain it.

When they looked at the graduation rate for the university across all campuses it was very good, above the national average. However, when they drilled down they found that the retention rate (students returning after one year) and the graduation rates among minorities (non-white) versus white students there is a gap, where the minorities are less likely to return after the first year and 12% less of them graduate from the university.

They are looking at why this is the case and for ways to provide more resources to this group to bring up those averages so more minority students return to the university after the first year and of those that do, a higher percentage of them graduate from the Penn State.

That's pretty much it.
 

doctornick

Active member
Oct 12, 2021
359
476
63
I think it's self explanatory based on the title. I read the article and it explains it in more detail, though.

For those who don't want to read the article I'll explain it.

When they looked at the graduation rate for the university across all campuses it was very good, above the national average. However, when they drilled down they found that the retention rate (students returning after one year) and the graduation rates among minorities (non-white) versus white students there is a gap, where the minorities are less likely to return after the first year and 12% less of them graduate from the university.

They are looking at why this is the case and for ways to provide more resources to this group to bring up those averages so more minority students return to the university after the first year and of those that do, a higher percentage of them graduate from the Penn State.

That's pretty much it.

That doesn't explain what "minoritized" means though.
 

doctornick

Active member
Oct 12, 2021
359
476
63
Did that word trigger you?
No? I was just responding to the conversation which seemed to be focused on what that word means than the general content of the article.

Personally I don’t really understand why it was used instead of Minority but maybe there’s some nuanced meaning I’m not aware of.

It means minority students who are underachieving and/or not returning after one year at Penn State.
Ok, but why not use “Minority”? Does “Minoritized” mean something different?
 

Midnighter

Well-known member
Oct 7, 2021
9,639
15,389
113
No? I was just responding to the conversation which seemed to be focused on what that word means than the general content of the article.

Personally I don’t really understand why it was used instead of Minority but maybe there’s some nuanced meaning I’m not aware of.


Ok, but why not use “Minority”? Does “Minoritized” mean something different?

I used Google:

Rather than referring to “minorities,” “members of minority groups” or “underrepresented minorities,” we should refer to such individuals as “minoritized.” Using “minoritized” makes it clear that being minoritized is about power and equity not numbers, connects racial oppression to the oppression of women, and gives us an easy way to conceive of intersectionality as being a minoritized member of a minoritized group. The term “minoritized” reveals the fact that white males and other dominant groups minoritize members of subordinated groups rather than obscuring this agency, describes microaggressions better than the term ‘microaggressions,’ and helps explain the need for solidarity within minoritized groups. It gives us a powerful way to promote racial justice by appealing to the common experience of being excluded. While using “minoritized” risks creating a false equivalence that sees all instances of being minoritized as equal and discounting unique forms of oppression by subsuming them under a single term, using this term carefully can ensure that its advantages outweigh these risks.

 

Karl_Havok

Well-known member
Oct 6, 2021
3,180
6,460
113
No? I was just responding to the conversation which seemed to be focused on what that word means than the general content of the article.

Personally I don’t really understand why it was used instead of Minority but maybe there’s some nuanced meaning I’m not aware of.


Ok, but why not use “Minority”? Does “Minoritized” mean something different?

I've never heard the word "minoritized" or seen it used before this article. It seems to mean the same as minority based on the context of the article. I looked it up and it is a real word that seems to mean the same thing though so I guess they are interchangeable. I couldn't tell you why they chose that version of it.

EDIT - It looks like Midnighter posted a more robust definition of the word.
 

GrimReaper

Well-known member
Oct 12, 2021
6,419
8,873
113
I used Google:

Rather than referring to “minorities,” “members of minority groups” or “underrepresented minorities,” we should refer to such individuals as “minoritized.” Using “minoritized” makes it clear that being minoritized is about power and equity not numbers, connects racial oppression to the oppression of women, and gives us an easy way to conceive of intersectionality as being a minoritized member of a minoritized group. The term “minoritized” reveals the fact that white males and other dominant groups minoritize members of subordinated groups rather than obscuring this agency, describes microaggressions better than the term ‘microaggressions,’ and helps explain the need for solidarity within minoritized groups. It gives us a powerful way to promote racial justice by appealing to the common experience of being excluded. While using “minoritized” risks creating a false equivalence that sees all instances of being minoritized as equal and discounting unique forms of oppression by subsuming them under a single term, using this term carefully can ensure that its advantages outweigh these risks.

 

BobPSU92

Well-known member
Oct 12, 2021
17,255
26,125
113
I used Google:

Rather than referring to “minorities,” “members of minority groups” or “underrepresented minorities,” we should refer to such individuals as “minoritized.” Using “minoritized” makes it clear that being minoritized is about power and equity not numbers, connects racial oppression to the oppression of women, and gives us an easy way to conceive of intersectionality as being a minoritized member of a minoritized group. The term “minoritized” reveals the fact that white males and other dominant groups minoritize members of subordinated groups rather than obscuring this agency, describes microaggressions better than the term ‘microaggressions,’ and helps explain the need for solidarity within minoritized groups. It gives us a powerful way to promote racial justice by appealing to the common experience of being excluded. While using “minoritized” risks creating a false equivalence that sees all instances of being minoritized as equal and discounting unique forms of oppression by subsuming them under a single term, using this term carefully can ensure that its advantages outweigh these risks.


 
Get unlimited access today.

Pick the right plan for you.

Already a member? Login