I think most college football fans have a sense that college coaching salaries are out of whack, spiraling out of control in the last 15-20 years. But here's some context for that.
Dabo Swinney's ~$11 million annual salary is 15% of Clemson football's total revenue. 15%! Ryan Day's is a more modest 8% of the team revenue. Even Shane Beamer's salary accounts for 3.8% of our total revenue. To put that in perspective, here is the percent of total revenue for the highest paid professional coaches:
NFL: Andy Reid's $25 million/year salary is 4% of the Chiefs total revenue
NBA: Steve Kerr's $17.5 million/year salary is 2.3% of the Warrior's total revenue
MLB: Craig Counsell's $8 million/year salary is 1.1% of the Cubs total revenue
More context: The CEO of Coca-Cola makes $25 million/year, or 0.05% of the company's total revenue.
The highest paid CEO in the country, Stephen Schwarzmann of Blackstone, Inc only pulls down a total compensation that is 8.6% of the company's total revenue. His actual salary (minus dividends, etc) only accounts for 2.45% of the company's total revenue.
The CEO of Walmart, which has the highest revenue of any company in America, has a salary that is .004% of company's total revenue.
I know some will say it's what the market demands, but is it really? Why would the market for college football demand coaching salaries that far outpace those of the highest paid professional coaches and CEOs in terms of total revenue? It makes no sense, business-wise. The Coca-Cola CEO would be making nearly $7 billion/year if he brought in 15% of the total revenue. Folks have lost their minds in the past about how much corporate CEOs make, but in terms of % of revenue, it's peanuts compared to many college football coaches.
It simply can't be what the market demands. It's largely an ego/pride thing. Schools take pride in saying they have the highest paid coach and coaches take pride in it as well.
Dabo Swinney's ~$11 million annual salary is 15% of Clemson football's total revenue. 15%! Ryan Day's is a more modest 8% of the team revenue. Even Shane Beamer's salary accounts for 3.8% of our total revenue. To put that in perspective, here is the percent of total revenue for the highest paid professional coaches:
NFL: Andy Reid's $25 million/year salary is 4% of the Chiefs total revenue
NBA: Steve Kerr's $17.5 million/year salary is 2.3% of the Warrior's total revenue
MLB: Craig Counsell's $8 million/year salary is 1.1% of the Cubs total revenue
More context: The CEO of Coca-Cola makes $25 million/year, or 0.05% of the company's total revenue.
The highest paid CEO in the country, Stephen Schwarzmann of Blackstone, Inc only pulls down a total compensation that is 8.6% of the company's total revenue. His actual salary (minus dividends, etc) only accounts for 2.45% of the company's total revenue.
The CEO of Walmart, which has the highest revenue of any company in America, has a salary that is .004% of company's total revenue.
I know some will say it's what the market demands, but is it really? Why would the market for college football demand coaching salaries that far outpace those of the highest paid professional coaches and CEOs in terms of total revenue? It makes no sense, business-wise. The Coca-Cola CEO would be making nearly $7 billion/year if he brought in 15% of the total revenue. Folks have lost their minds in the past about how much corporate CEOs make, but in terms of % of revenue, it's peanuts compared to many college football coaches.
It simply can't be what the market demands. It's largely an ego/pride thing. Schools take pride in saying they have the highest paid coach and coaches take pride in it as well.