New Nickname for Brock & Arnett

bully12

Active member
Sep 2, 2012
1,291
412
83
I've seen enough. Both need to be called unemployed
No!!! If we did that after one season. we would lose total credibility and respect in the process of hiring another coach(s). We would have to pay outrageously for the next ones.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: RockyDog

MississippiTexan

New member
Jun 11, 2014
58
23
8
No!!! If we did that after one season. we would lose total credibility and respect in the process of hiring another coach(s). We would have to pay outrageously for the next ones.
I don't think that is the case with the way we hired him and the situation that happened. We didn't fire Leach, he died, and we made a quick decision to hire internally to stabilize the program. We didn't even have an AD at the time. If we had done a national search and picked him out of a pool of candidates or had hired someone else from outside then you would be correct. I'm not sure we should fire him yet, but I think we could at the end of year and no one would look poorly on us. However, if we do fire him, we better make it a good one because we will need to give that coach at least 3 years.
 

MagnoliaHunter

Active member
Jan 23, 2007
880
398
63
I dont think it’s a coaching issue. I think it’s a talent issue. Which still partially falls on them.

Not a talent issue when we continued to cover lsu's best receiver with a safety. Or to keep covering USCe's receiver m2m and 9 yards off.
 

Ranchdawg

Well-known member
Dec 13, 2012
3,099
2,252
113
Blues Brothers! I sure had the blues after watching their defense against LSU and USCe.
 

8dog

Well-known member
Feb 23, 2008
12,262
3,218
113
Yea we went 9-4 last year, 4-8/5-7 points to coaching not talent.
We had 2 NFL players last year and 1 practice squad guy. Not coincidentally they all played the positions killing is.

We scored 30 points on the road. We only scored 30 offensive points 1 time in the sec last year and that was at home against Ark. in our 3 road swing games last year we scored 16, 10 and 24. We just weren’t that good offensively last year.
 

blitz2Win

Well-known member
Sep 2, 2023
705
716
93
We averaged 31.6 ppg last year And went 9-4. Not Too shabby. 19,seniors return and .....
 

8dog

Well-known member
Feb 23, 2008
12,262
3,218
113
We averaged 31.6 ppg last year And went 9-4. Not Too shabby. 19,seniors return and .....
We averaged 20.25 ppg in regulation SEC play. In our 9th win, we scored 13 points. We just werent that great offensively in SEC play.
 

60sdog

Active member
Oct 9, 2010
634
376
63
We averaged 20.25 ppg in regulation SEC play. In our 9th win, we scored 13 points. We just werent that great offensively in SEC
We averaged 20.25 ppg in regulation SEC play. In our 9th win, we scored 13 points. We just werent that great offensively in SEC play.
LOL, the 9th win wasn’t an SEC win. Very misleading.
 

8dog

Well-known member
Feb 23, 2008
12,262
3,218
113
LOL, the 9th win wasn’t an SEC win. Very misleading.
Yeah I assumed we had enough knowledgeable fans that understood what I was saying. How about this- we weren’t very good in the sec or against any P5 teams that made a bowl….does that work? Does that more clearly represent that we just weren’t that good on offense?
 

blitz2Win

Well-known member
Sep 2, 2023
705
716
93
We weren’t a playoff team last year, but we’ were pretty good. Well coached and a tough team.

Im seeing something quite different this year. I think by the end of the year there won’t be any room for spin.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MagnoliaHunter
Get unlimited access today.

Pick the right plan for you.

Already a member? Login