Just a few thoughts on NIL, FWIW:
1) It's too bad what has happened to college football. Part of the charm of the sport was seeing kids develop over time, after they had made a commitment to the university of their choice. Even in pro sports, at least players are theoretically committed to an organization through the term of their contract. Now, in college, there is no real commitment by the player or by the university.
2) On the positive side, Bama or TAMU cannot keep every good player. On an 85-man roster, half of those kids are going to be disappointed with their role on the team and transfer elsewhere within a year or two. So perhaps talent will end up spreading out to a wider variety of programs.
3) Penn State's main advantage in the NIL game is not that it has a small group of high rollers, or even a main high roller like Phil Knight at Oregon. Penn State's advantage is our huge alumni base, and this NIL effort is an attempt to capitalize on this advantage. Well played.
4) What happens in a situation where a kid gets a huge NIL deal and then bails out of the program after a year because there is a better deal somewhere else? Do the NIL donors get a refund?
5) The worst part of this will be when lesser programs with fewer dollars are used as a farm system for the richer programs. I can easily envision that a kid has success at a Mountain West program, the fanbase gets excited about the kid, but the kid jumps for a better deal at USC. This is very similar to MLB, where small-market teams struggle mightily to complete. That's not good for the sport in the long run.
I expect Penn State will come out just fine in the brave new world of NIL. But I'm not sure I care that much anymore.