He was very prophetic. If you believe the referees are unbiased when we play Alabama in football and UK in basketball then you are the most naive fan in the SEC. Do you really believe that the SEC would do anything to impede UK from making the NCAA tournament? You were right that we didn't help the situation but this was a close game and it doesn't take much to change the outcome.
Its a message board- when you have 30 people giving 30 slightly different views, it isnt a surprise when you can tie one to being 'correct'.
Human error seems to equate to 'refs were told to throw the game'.
Poor job quality seems to equate to 'refs were told to throw the game'.
Look up who ref'd the game. None are 'SEC refs'. Its patently absurd that the claimed collusion could continue for so long and involve so many people without whistleblowing. The SEC picking who wins or loses would completely destroy the conference. It would be sued into oblivion by all sorts of groups(gambling being a powerful obvious one) and criminal charges would be filed.
But sure- for decades now, the SEC has successfully bought the compliance and silence of hundreds upon hundreds of refs.