I've thought for a few years, and expressed here before the idea that you might field 2 different offenses...one an air-raid or some modified version of one, and the other a triple option. Perhaps your triple-option players aren't highly-enough rated to make an SEC roster elsewhere, but are good enough to run triple option effectively enough to force opposing DC's to split valuable game-week prep time accounting for both.
That way, at any point in the game we could run the triple option out there for as many plays as we like, yet against a defense that couldn't realistically prepare for both our #1 offense and our TO offense.
Given the current state of football with NIL, transfer rules, portals, etc., there seems to be not as much a need or even value to gradually bring along the younger non-starting players to take over when their time comes. Good ones, or those who show potential might be gone before they ever start for us.
But the kind of athletes that would come to State willing to play triple option for a chance to play in the SEC might be less likely to get poached, thus get better at it each year. I'm thinking you might be able to get by with 1 coach doing most of the work with that unit.
Think about it. If the opposing defense doesn't adequately prepare in one week of game prep for either or both offenses, then one or both have a better chance at success, even if we don't match up on talent across the board.
Maybe you take the players who can't break into the 2-deep to learn and practice the triple option. Sure, if they took the field it would then be against much more highly-rated players, but also players who had very little time to prep, perhaps closing the talent gap enough.