And then Pt. 2 happened. LOL.As I watched Monday, it was evident they were hammering home the point that Franklin was in their view, a racist. They spent a good amount of time highlighting that view.
And then Pt. 2 happened. LOL.As I watched Monday, it was evident they were hammering home the point that Franklin was in their view, a racist. They spent a good amount of time highlighting that view.
As I watched Monday, it was evident they were hammering home the point that Franklin was in their view, a racist. They spent a good amount of time highlighting that view.
So? In those days just about every American citizen was a racist by today’s standards. To his credit he changed late in life.As I watched Monday, it was evident they were hammering home the point that Franklin was in their view, a racist. They spent a good amount of time highlighting that view.
Exactly, especially in documentaries where you can get away with a lot of editing to emphasize your point while downplaying or outright ignoring counterpoints. Michael Moore say hello. You can get away with a lot more with a documentary than you can a book, provided the book publisher has integrity. I have seen so many times where the historians will make great leaps to conclusions on the screen. I can only hope that there wasn’t enough time to include the supporting evidence on film.Presenting history will always involve subjectivity. It can be no other way.
He made a half time adjustment and was able to find a way to defeat the British. He finally used an attacking defense as opposed to a bend but don’t break defense.Franklin hates first halves.
Yeah really. Then we would all be stuck speaking English.Mark me down for a thumbs up. I thought Burns did a nice job of presenting Franklin, warts and all. I enjoyed the way that he constantly worked on improving himself as a human being.
The doc reinforced my opinion that Franklin was a truly brilliant (probably genius level IQ) and fascinating man and we may still be England without him.
Oh yeah, and now I want to work an Armonica solo into my next music recording.
How Alexander Wedderburn Cost England America | American Philosophical Society
Benjamin Franklin thought of himself as British. Yes, he was born in America, and certainly some of his identity was that of an American, but his America was part of the British Empire. Franklin was a British subject. By 1774, with dissatisfaction with British rule in America growing, Franklin...www.amphilsoc.org
No. He is a cousin who lives around the corner. Not distant at all.Is Floyd a distant relative?
I enjoyed what I was able to watch even though the historians were giving their thoughts and conclusions they created about the guy. This stuff went down over 200 years ago so not going to get upset with how today's generation interprets the past. I am thankful for Franklin and our founding fathers. I can't even imaging their mindsets to start a revolution and their own country.Yeah really. Then we would all be stuck speaking English.
How Alexander Wedderburn Cost England America | American Philosophical Society
Benjamin Franklin thought of himself as British. Yes, he was born in America, and certainly some of his identity was that of an American, but his America was part of the British Empire. Franklin was a British subject. By 1774, with dissatisfaction with British rule in America growing, Franklin...www.amphilsoc.org
Again, the reason I prefer books over documentaries are for the citations and footnotes. The bad thing is that they always lead to an unsurmountable 'to read' list.