OT: CEO killer caught?

Podgy

Well-known member
Oct 1, 2022
2,466
2,728
113
We have some weak *** murderers in this country. I've been a State fan for decades something that should inspire a manifesto out of me. All I do is post here a bit. I stare-down adversity and disappointment and move on to next season.
 

paindonthurt17

Active member
Jul 11, 2024
635
443
63
Yeah. If.

Let’s see if this guy stays alive long enough to make it to trial. If not, you’ll have the answer as to how “close to true” it is (not very).
If he mysteriously dies, yep.

speaking of, what ever happened to that Las Vegas investigation
 

paindonthurt17

Active member
Jul 11, 2024
635
443
63
I think that a large percentage of angst in this country among young people has to do with having no "real" problems in life. By "real", I mean they largely aren't worried about if they will have food, or a place to live, etc. We seem pre-disposed to need something to worry about. This may explain a lot of our outrage culture too.
Surprising coming from you but I agree.

people have it so good in this country compared to 95% of the rest of the world.

victim mentality is beyond me
 

Anon1717806835

Well-known member
Jun 7, 2024
245
715
93
Surprising coming from you but I agree.

people have it so good in this country compared to 95% of the rest of the world.

victim mentality is beyond me
Like a good bit of nonsense in our culture, I think its the kind of thing that has always existed, but its made worse by Facebook, Reddit, message boards, and the like.
 
  • Like
Reactions: paindonthurt17

ckDOG

Well-known member
Dec 11, 2007
8,532
3,088
113
I think that a large percentage of angst in this country among young people has to do with having no "real" problems in life. By "real", I mean they largely aren't worried about if they will have food, or a place to live, etc. We seem pre-disposed to need something to worry about. This may explain a lot of our outrage culture too.
No doubt about this. Extend it further to beyond just young people. We love to manufacture drama despite our relative wealth and security. Goes across all ages, cultures, politics...
 

UpTheMiddlex3Punt

Well-known member
May 28, 2007
17,247
2,525
113
Could you imagine your last meal as a free man being McDonalds?
Donald Trump GIF by Storyful
 

Perd Hapley

Well-known member
Sep 30, 2022
3,946
4,223
113
I don't know. The question of how it got there doesn't change whether he put it there or somebody else.

And as for where it went, I would suspect if you leave a bike unchained in most places of NYC, you aren't likely going to have to worry about disposing of it.
Those two statements don’t really line up with one another. If he brought the bike to a pickup point beforehand, he’s not leaving it for 30 minutes unattended before he needs it, for the same reason you just mentioned.

And NYPD was publicly and adamantly looking for the bike….along with the murder weapon, but couldn’t find it. They followed his every move on camera for 10 days, but never saw him with the bike. He didn’t show up to the city on the bus with it. Never purchased it. Didn’t have it the morning of the murder. Then suddenly he has it after going through a camera dead spot? Its weird. Doesn’t add up.

There were also 2-3 other individuals sharing the room with him at the hostel, per the clerk.

I certainly don't doubt that he could have had an accomplice or multiple ones. They could have had a little club. I just don't think the bike requires it. He was apparently staying at the hostel for several days. Plenty of time to stash it nearby. That assumes there was a place for it to be safely locked nearby that he could count on it being there for a day or two.
The hostel was almost 50 blocks north and 4-5 blocks east of the crime scene. He only was on foot for a block or 2 before getting on the e-bike. Again, he was never seen with the bike that morning (between leaving at 5:30 AM and the murder at 6:30ish) or at any point in the preceding 10 days. On all the footage they had of him.
 

drexeldog23

Well-known member
Dec 2, 2022
556
578
93
His twitter is still out there if anyone wants insight to his thoughts and influences.

@PepMangione
i saw on TYT earlier that he was a fan of Tucker Carlson and Elon and quoted Ted Kazunabomber,not trying to spell that, alot on X
 

Lucifer Morningstar

Well-known member
Aug 30, 2022
1,395
2,162
113
I think that a large percentage of angst in this country among young people has to do with having no "real" problems in life. By "real", I mean they largely aren't worried about if they will have food, or a place to live, etc. We seem pre-disposed to need something to worry about. This may explain a lot of our outrage culture too.
IMG_7497.gif
 

johnson86-1

Well-known member
Aug 22, 2012
12,505
2,755
113
Those two statements don’t really line up with one another. If he brought the bike to a pickup point beforehand, he’s not leaving it for 30 minutes unattended before he needs it, for the same reason you just mentioned.

I haven't watched the escape footage, but I was assuming it was locked. Doesn't take that long to undo a key lock and stuff the chain and lock into a bag. I just meant afterwards if he just left the bike unlocked and unattended, disposal would probably care of itself.

And NYPD was publicly and adamantly looking for the bike….along with the murder weapon, but couldn’t find it. They followed his every move on camera for 10 days, but never saw him with the bike. He didn’t show up to the city on the bus with it. Never purchased it. Didn’t have it the morning of the murder. Then suddenly he has it after going through a camera dead spot? Its weird. Doesn’t add up.

There were also 2-3 other individuals sharing the room with him at the hostel, per the clerk.


The hostel was almost 50 blocks north and 4-5 blocks east of the crime scene. He only was on foot for a block or 2 before getting on the e-bike. Again, he was never seen with the bike that morning (between leaving at 5:30 AM and the murder at 6:30ish) or at any point in the preceding 10 days. On all the footage they had of him.

I was just assuming they tried to find video of the bike being dropped there and couldn't pick it up on camera, then there are obviously blind spots and he could have taken advantage just like an accomplice could have. Now if they picked him up on camera coming into the city and can consistently get pics/footage of him often enough that he never had a window where he could drop the bike, then yes, that would indicate he had an accomplice. But if they have that much video coverage, it makes it odd that they can't find the bike getting dropped off.

The level of surveillance is not really surprising, but it's still a little spooky. I wonder how many people are voluntarily providing video footage to Law enforcement without being asked. I think Ring used to have an opt in program where you just agreed to give law enforcement access to your footage at any time they wanted to access it without them having to go through the warrant process. Combine enough feeds with facial recognition and AI, and I guess they can pretty much track anybody they want. And that assumes that they actually get permission and the intelligence agencies don't just have backdoors to grab stuff and feed it into a database.
 

dorndawg

Well-known member
Sep 10, 2012
7,210
5,553
113
The level of surveillance is not really surprising, but it's still a little spooky. I wonder how many people are voluntarily providing video footage to Law enforcement without being asked. I think Ring used to have an opt in program where you just agreed to give law enforcement access to your footage at any time they wanted to access it without them having to go through the warrant process. Combine enough feeds with facial recognition and AI, and I guess they can pretty much track anybody they want. And that assumes that they actually get permission and the intelligence agencies don't just have backdoors to grab stuff and feed it into a database.
My city has that program (there may be more than 1). For homeowners, my understanding is you let the police know there's cameras at your house and they'll contact you if they want to have a look, assuming there was a crime nearby. Businesses can actually give police the right to go directly in their system and look at footage; the cops *PROMISE* they'll only do so for legitimate reasons.

it is BAFFLING to me how many people trip over themselves to go sign up for stuff like this.
 

The Cooterpoot

Well-known member
Sep 29, 2022
4,538
7,513
113
A guy who grew up in a wealthy family, went to an Ivy League school, and lived in Hawaii. Boy he should really hate capitalism and corporate greed!**
 
  • Like
Reactions: L4Dawg

johnson86-1

Well-known member
Aug 22, 2012
12,505
2,755
113
My city has that program (there may be more than 1). For homeowners, my understanding is you let the police know there's cameras at your house and they'll contact you if they want to have a look, assuming there was a crime nearby. Businesses can actually give police the right to go directly in their system and look at footage; the cops *PROMISE* they'll only do so for legitimate reasons.

it is BAFFLING to me how many people trip over themselves to go sign up for stuff like this.
Yea, I'm perfectly happy to share my camera footage if there is a crime. But just signing up for them to access it at will seems incredibly short sighted.

That said, we occasionally has shitheads roaming our neighborhood and adjacent neighborhoods breaking into cars, and it's nice that they have to hike a good bit to do so without getting their car on camera.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dorndawg and patdog
Get unlimited access today.

Pick the right plan for you.

Already a member? Login