Probably a mcgriddle. People that like those are definitely unstable.I wonder what meal he was eating when it happened?
Probably a mcgriddle. People that like those are definitely unstable.I wonder what meal he was eating when it happened?
You know it was the McRibI wonder what meal he was eating when it happened?
Sometimes you just want a sausage patty between two pre syruped pancakes!Probably a mcgriddle. People that like those are definitely unstable.
If he mysteriously dies, yep.Yeah. If.
Let’s see if this guy stays alive long enough to make it to trial. If not, you’ll have the answer as to how “close to true” it is (not very).
Probably some brainwashing and mental illness in there too.Occam's Razor wins again? No greater conspiracy, just pain and anger driving someone to do something tragic, it appears.
Surprising coming from you but I agree.I think that a large percentage of angst in this country among young people has to do with having no "real" problems in life. By "real", I mean they largely aren't worried about if they will have food, or a place to live, etc. We seem pre-disposed to need something to worry about. This may explain a lot of our outrage culture too.
Like a good bit of nonsense in our culture, I think its the kind of thing that has always existed, but its made worse by Facebook, Reddit, message boards, and the like.Surprising coming from you but I agree.
people have it so good in this country compared to 95% of the rest of the world.
victim mentality is beyond me
No doubt about this. Extend it further to beyond just young people. We love to manufacture drama despite our relative wealth and security. Goes across all ages, cultures, politics...I think that a large percentage of angst in this country among young people has to do with having no "real" problems in life. By "real", I mean they largely aren't worried about if they will have food, or a place to live, etc. We seem pre-disposed to need something to worry about. This may explain a lot of our outrage culture too.
There's only 1 answer...the McRib.I wonder what meal he was eating when it happened?
I don't know. The question of how it got there doesn't change whether he put it there or somebody else.
Those two statements don’t really line up with one another. If he brought the bike to a pickup point beforehand, he’s not leaving it for 30 minutes unattended before he needs it, for the same reason you just mentioned.And as for where it went, I would suspect if you leave a bike unchained in most places of NYC, you aren't likely going to have to worry about disposing of it.
The hostel was almost 50 blocks north and 4-5 blocks east of the crime scene. He only was on foot for a block or 2 before getting on the e-bike. Again, he was never seen with the bike that morning (between leaving at 5:30 AM and the murder at 6:30ish) or at any point in the preceding 10 days. On all the footage they had of him.I certainly don't doubt that he could have had an accomplice or multiple ones. They could have had a little club. I just don't think the bike requires it. He was apparently staying at the hostel for several days. Plenty of time to stash it nearby. That assumes there was a place for it to be safely locked nearby that he could count on it being there for a day or two.
i saw on TYT earlier that he was a fan of Tucker Carlson and Elon and quoted Ted Kazunabomber,not trying to spell that, alot on XHis twitter is still out there if anyone wants insight to his thoughts and influences.
@PepMangione
I think that a large percentage of angst in this country among young people has to do with having no "real" problems in life. By "real", I mean they largely aren't worried about if they will have food, or a place to live, etc. We seem pre-disposed to need something to worry about. This may explain a lot of our outrage culture too.
Those two statements don’t really line up with one another. If he brought the bike to a pickup point beforehand, he’s not leaving it for 30 minutes unattended before he needs it, for the same reason you just mentioned.
And NYPD was publicly and adamantly looking for the bike….along with the murder weapon, but couldn’t find it. They followed his every move on camera for 10 days, but never saw him with the bike. He didn’t show up to the city on the bus with it. Never purchased it. Didn’t have it the morning of the murder. Then suddenly he has it after going through a camera dead spot? Its weird. Doesn’t add up.
There were also 2-3 other individuals sharing the room with him at the hostel, per the clerk.
The hostel was almost 50 blocks north and 4-5 blocks east of the crime scene. He only was on foot for a block or 2 before getting on the e-bike. Again, he was never seen with the bike that morning (between leaving at 5:30 AM and the murder at 6:30ish) or at any point in the preceding 10 days. On all the footage they had of him.
My city has that program (there may be more than 1). For homeowners, my understanding is you let the police know there's cameras at your house and they'll contact you if they want to have a look, assuming there was a crime nearby. Businesses can actually give police the right to go directly in their system and look at footage; the cops *PROMISE* they'll only do so for legitimate reasons.The level of surveillance is not really surprising, but it's still a little spooky. I wonder how many people are voluntarily providing video footage to Law enforcement without being asked. I think Ring used to have an opt in program where you just agreed to give law enforcement access to your footage at any time they wanted to access it without them having to go through the warrant process. Combine enough feeds with facial recognition and AI, and I guess they can pretty much track anybody they want. And that assumes that they actually get permission and the intelligence agencies don't just have backdoors to grab stuff and feed it into a database.
Yea, I'm perfectly happy to share my camera footage if there is a crime. But just signing up for them to access it at will seems incredibly short sighted.My city has that program (there may be more than 1). For homeowners, my understanding is you let the police know there's cameras at your house and they'll contact you if they want to have a look, assuming there was a crime nearby. Businesses can actually give police the right to go directly in their system and look at footage; the cops *PROMISE* they'll only do so for legitimate reasons.
it is BAFFLING to me how many people trip over themselves to go sign up for stuff like this.