The question of preference as a store of value is not, "Would I rather be paid in fiat or bitcoin?" The question is, "Which would I rather hold for 5+ years?"For me, the question is - if my employer offered to pay me in BTC instead of USD for the rest of my career, starting today, would I take it? That's an emphatic "No.".
you gotta do your own research - no one can convince you. when you get it you get itSo I guess that’s the standard reply when you have no constructive defense for your position. As many wise men have said, if you can’t explain it or teach it, then do you truly understand it yourself?
You are approaching me like I’m being a smart áss. I’m legitimately looking for answers here.
If bitcoin has tremendous value (in USD or otherwise), great. If I want a piece, I have to buy in. If I buy in, I have to pay something. If I pay something, I have to know that the amount I am paying is less than the value I am getting.
The biggest enthusiasts simply fall back on “wait 3.5 years, guaranteed payback!”, or “it’s always gone up vs. fiat”. Nobody can explain what it’s actually worth (in any terms) or what the utility is, or why the price trend on an asset with a grand total of 15 years in existence should be given the same latitude as the 80 year track record of the S&P 500.
Is there a future where some entities will accept ONLY bitcoin, and the price spread will be drastic on goods sold there vs. USD equivalent at other locations? Is there a future where capital gains taxes will not be made on crypto cash-out?
And if I’m just blindly speculating and want something as a low allocation moon-shot attempt in the back end of my investment portfolio, is Bitcoin a bigger payoff than penny stocks, hedge funds, AI start-ups, or what have you?
Again, these are legit curiosities. If you can provide constructive info, it’d go a long way in getting me on the wagon. But your initial take doesn’t make you appear capable of that.
Yes, that is the question you have to ask if you want the answer to be Bitcoin. But ask me the same question about Apple stock, or Amazon stock, or any of the big 3 stock markets in general. So, yes, I'd rather store my money in the stock market than the bank. The difference is, the stock market doesn't have designs on replacing fiat currency. It's a store of value FOR fiat currency. The same as BTC for the vast majority of people. People aren't exactly fleeing from the markets to BTC, which is what I guess you were insinuating.The question of preference as a store of value is not, "Would I rather be paid in fiat or bitcoin?" The question is, "Which would I rather hold for 5+ years?"
You’re assuming I haven’t already done plenty of research. Trust me, I have. And I’ve come away with far more questions than answers.you gotta do your own research - no one can convince you. when you get it you get it
look into the strike app, el salvador monetary policy, general cross border transaction fees, peer to peer fees, demand vs supply, btc governance vs govt issue
probably not for you - some get it some don’t. maybe look into centennial coin collections insteadYou’re assuming I haven’t already done plenty of research. Trust me, I have. And I’ve come away with far more questions than answers.
Ultimately, I’m not a Bitcoin doubter or skeptic. I’m a complete agnostic. But I struggle very much to find the data to support the notion that taking a position in BTC is worth anything more than just diversification of assets.
As a “store of value”, BTC has underperformed gold for 3 years running. As an “inflation hedge”, BTC’s value has not performed in that capacity at all in the highest 3 consecutive years of inflation in quite awhile. A BTC valued around $50k in Feb 2021 would need to be worth $58,000 USD today just to have the same purchasing power. It’s nowhere near that. In fact, it has even less unadjusted purchasing power than it did in 2021.
I could say the exact same thing to you. We are two sides of the same coin (pun intended). Only difference is I don’t shout from the rooftops about the virtues of something when I don’t actually don’t know a damn thing about said virtues.probably not for you - some get it some don’t. maybe look into centennial coin collections instead
As a long-term investor, I only look at comparisons of 5+ years. If you look at comparisons of 1-14 years, 3 years is the only time period that bitcoin didn't outperform gold and the S&P 500.As a “store of value”, BTC has underperformed gold for 3 years running. As an “inflation hedge”, BTC’s value has not performed in that capacity at all in the highest 3 consecutive years of inflation in quite awhile. A BTC valued around $50k in Feb 2021 would need to be worth $58,000 USD today just to have the same purchasing power. Its nowhere near that. In fact, it has even less unadjusted purchasing power than it did in 2021.
Not really concerned if bitcoin is fungible or not. Buy it on the dips and sell on the way up or buy a fury beeny thing does it matter if you’re making money? Me personally I don’t fool with bitcoin…more so watch bitcoin and everything follows. I’m not sure why everyone is so negative on crypto when everyone would like to make money. Is the gold you bought under your pillow? My crypto isn’t either, but I can sell or buy it on coinbase in an instant…..how many on here gamble? Same as trading stocks, gambling or crypto. Just have to be smartBitcoin bros have at it
I will also add I’m a conspiracy guy….don’t trust the gubment, so why not figured crypto. I’m not a rich guy, put $500 in and make $20 a week….spending money. What if? Crypto is not for the weak at heart, you never know what the high or low is. Find a couple of good projects with lots of zeroes…it’s a gamble. Might as well put $500 into small caps and wait 3 years or …….Bitcoin bros have at it
Outcomes at a casino would probably be a better option,probably not for you - some get it some don’t. maybe look into centennial coin collections instead
Dawgstudent - We need an eyeroll emoji for when someone makes a stupid, condescending, pointless comment like this one.probably not for you - some get it some don’t. maybe look into centennial coin collections instead
No, no. This is what we do in America today. Someone doesn't agree with me? Well, I'm smart, so that must make them stupid. And I HAVE to tell them they're stupid.I could say the exact same thing to you. We are two sides of the same coin (pun intended). Only difference is I don’t shout from the rooftops about the virtues of something when I don’t actually don’t know a damn thing about said virtues.
You make a great argument for my position. It is an investment. You said so yourself. And, I agree with you, it's a great investment!As a long-term investor, I only look at comparisons of 5+ years. If you look at comparisons of 1-14 years, 3 years is the only time period that bitcoin didn't outperform gold and the S&P 500.
View attachment 529116
The monetary expansion started Q1 2020 (COVID).
Bitcoin is up over 400% since this monetary expansion started. This includes the 2022 bear market.M2
View data of a measure of the U.S. money supply that includes all components of M1 plus several less-liquid assets.fred.stlouisfed.org
No argument here. Unfortunately, I don’t have much choice on whether or not I want to have at least some exposure to US dollars.Yea, I got you. My point was that you can ask the same question about the US dollar and get roughly the same answer.
Totally agree…..I only bring it up because of what has been shared by the Bitcoin supporters how its up 8 million percent since inception or whatever. That’s not a sustainable path. Everyone that is ever going to get pure wealth from holding BTC has almost assuredly already done so.You are trying to value bitcoin as a productive asset and by that metric, it's a loser, just like the USD is. In reality, Bitcoin is a medium of exchange/currency. It's perfectly reasonable to say I am not going to make any currency plays; I'd rather store my assets in productive assets. That's more or less my position. But you don't need to ask your questions about bitcoin to get to that answer.
Also agree. I don’t think BTC goes to zero. I think it more or less will follow the broader “store of value” market….mainly precious metals. But there’s a non-0% chance it could go belly up, which is enough to keep most folks from treating their stake as anything more than novelty.If I were going to make a currency play, I would bet on bitcoin. The reason I'm not making a currency play is that bitcoin has a risk of going to zero and I'm not willing to put enough of my assets at risk at this point to make a difference. I don't think bitcoin is going to zero, but it's also unclear to me what happens if/when bitcoin actually becomes used as a currency instead of a speculative investment.
Same.I'd rather just take my risks with productive assets.
You seem pretty reasonable about all this. Can you at least see the manipulative way that the data above is being presented?As a long-term investor, I only look at comparisons of 5+ years. If you look at comparisons of 1-14 years, 3 years is the only time period that bitcoin didn't outperform gold and the S&P 500.
View attachment 529116
The monetary expansion started Q1 2020 (COVID).
Bitcoin is up over 400% since this monetary expansion started. This includes the 2022 bear market.M2
View data of a measure of the U.S. money supply that includes all components of M1 plus several less-liquid assets.fred.stlouisfed.org
I agree that CAGR is more relevant than ROI. Again, looking at 1-14 year periods, 3 years is the only period that bitcoin didn't outperform gold and the S&P 500.You seem pretty reasonable about all this. Can you at least see the manipulative way that the data above is being presented?
For starters, its showing total return instead of annualized rate of return. This greatly favors whatever item of comparison started at the lowest point, and ignores volitility the most. For something that in its infancy was practically worthless, this is going to greatly skew its outlook.
If I did a chart showing the price of Apple stock starting in 2004 (pre-iPhone) and ending in 2014, the annualized rate of return if that period was 35%….which is ungodly. But its still nothing close to the 5875% TOTAL return it experienced over the same period.
Now, lets look at the next 10 years. The annualized rate of return from 2024 until today dropped to 22.5% from the previous 10 year period. Still outstanding. Not quite as good as 35%, but nobody’s crying over 20% plus gains. But the overall return? Dropped from 5875% from the previous decade down to 980%. Again, still outstanding, but it just shows how much data presentation can change the facts to show what the presenter wants you to see. One metric says Apple’s 2014-2024 was about 70% as good as its 2004-2014. The other says it wasn’t even 20% as good. The starting value being super low makes everything look better than it is.
And as you can tell, if you pick any big tech stock from the past 20 years, you can make the data say its > Bitcoin if you choose the right comparison frame.
A simple question for you. Do you think, truly, that 1 BTC is going to be worth $884 TRILLION dollars, just 15 years from now? Because, that is what will have to happen for the total return of Years 16-30 matching that of Years 1-15.
Great. When I get that time machine and the chance to go back and buy bitcoin 1-14 years ago, then that chart will start to mean something.I agree that CAGR is more relevant than ROI. Again, looking at 1-14 year periods, 3 years is the only period that bitcoin didn't outperform gold and the S&P 500.
View attachment 529348
Bitcoin also outperforms the S&P 500, gold, and long-term US bonds over the long-term when you compare their Shape ratios, which adjusts for risk (volatility):
The Case for Bitcoin
Keep track of the macro environment and where Bitcoin sits within it. CaseBitcoin provides key stats, a growing library of the best Bitcoin investment content that makes the case for Bitcoin, and day-to-day coverage of why more and more people are seeking refuge in Bitcoin.casebitcoin.com
I put a little play money in the ETF. I've single handedly assured that the founder will turn up for the first time since 2011, scold us on what a bunch of gullible idiots we are for thinking that a computer program algorithm magically creates value and then hit the hidden kill switch on the machine.***Great. When I get that time machine and the chance to go back and buy bitcoin 1-14 years ago, then that chart will start to mean something.
You are far from the first person to think market irrationality is something other than it is. Rationality always comes around though.
Thank you. Very good chart here. And yes, the Bitcoin CAGR has exceeded the S&P and gold over that horizon.I agree that CAGR is more relevant than ROI. Again, looking at 1-14 year periods, 3 years is the only period that bitcoin didn't outperform gold and the S&P 500.
View attachment 529348
Bitcoin also outperforms the S&P 500, gold, and long-term US bonds over the long-term when you compare their Shape ratios, which adjusts for risk (volatility):
The Case for Bitcoin
Keep track of the macro environment and where Bitcoin sits within it. CaseBitcoin provides key stats, a growing library of the best Bitcoin investment content that makes the case for Bitcoin, and day-to-day coverage of why more and more people are seeking refuge in Bitcoin.casebitcoin.com
Also yesterday:Bump because it felt new enough not to start a new thread. This reflects how I see it:
https://www.marketwatch.com/story/bitcoin-isnt-suitable-as-payment-or-investment-ecb-says-0e6ffb76
Also yesterday:
I believe the inevitable choice is CBDC vs. bitcoin. China will choose CBDC. I believe bitcoin is the American choice.
There is a good book that makes this case:
Bitcoin and the American Dream: The New Monetary Technology Transcending Our Political Divide
say you don’t understand the business world without saying itVery unlikely I'd hold the position of a multi-business failure and multi-bankruptcy guy up as a positive sign. Of course if Trump changes his position on anything it's because Putin wiggled his index finger...
Trump's position is that he likes the dollar.Very unlikely I'd hold the position of a multi-business failure and multi-bankruptcy guy up as a positive sign. Of course if Trump changes his position on anything it's because Putin wiggled his index finger...
W.T.F.Excuse me, sir. Seeing as how the V.P. is such a V.I.P., shouldn't we keep the P.C. on the Q.T.? 'Cause if it leaks to the V.C. he could end up M.I.A., and then we'd all be put on K.P.
You are being kind calling that a position. Was more of his typical word salad response to a question that's too complex for him to answer.Very unlikely I'd hold the position of a multi-business failure and multi-bankruptcy guy up as a positive sign. Of course if Trump changes his position on anything it's because Putin wiggled his index finger...
Where’s Trump on the bell curve? Probably at the top of it. Because according to him, that bell curve looks like a side boob, and the top is the nipple. He’s grabbing that curve right by the nipple, and it will love him for it because he’s a star. All the smartest and best bell curve people agree that this is the case.Trump's position is that he likes the dollar.
Where do you think Trump is on this bell curve? Where are you?
View attachment 532430
if i wanted only 20% i would buy techsI still don’t understand bitcoin, but I’ve been telling y’all about ET for a while. It pays dividends in American dollars, so that may not work for some of y’all, but you can use those to buy bitcoins
Plus 10% dividends. Tell me your return when you cash out or get a return of any kind.if i wanted only 20% i would buy techs
191% - i’ll likely sell at the end of this bull cycle which usually coincides when QE peaksPlus 10% dividends. Tell me your return when you cash out or get a return of any kind.