OT: I am trying to figure out the FTX thing out..

horshack.sixpack

Well-known member
Oct 30, 2012
9,068
5,072
113
I am trying to figure it out in simple terms...

So basically, people gave Bankman-Fried their money. In return he gave them fake digital money. Then he took the real money, spent it and gave it away? Now there is no real money backing the fake money. They are talking as much as one billion not accounted for. Is that what happened? Also were there no laws broken?
For posterity:
 

Walkthedawg

Well-known member
Oct 3, 2022
464
773
93
How much did he give to Republicans?

Said on business network this morning that it was a 90-10 split. 90 D. 10 R.

Interviewed a couple of politicians that were on the way to the Capitol and questions about returning the money was met with word salad mish mash responses.
 

ckDOG

Well-known member
Dec 11, 2007
8,224
2,552
113
This is bigger than a Ponzi scheme. A lot of money came to him thru Ukraine and from him to the democrats. C'mon people. It's your tax money at work. That's what the mafia....err....democrats do.
Going to regret this, but can we have a link? All I see is FTX setting up a mechanism for people to donate to Ukraine...not for Ukraine to invest in FTX.
 

Pars

Well-known member
Oct 11, 2015
888
543
93

looks like a couple guys are giving it back.
Head ceo have 40 million to dems
Co-ceo gave 24 million to Reps
Hedging bets it seems
 

dawgdoug1962

Member
Oct 14, 2013
279
8
18
Laws were broken. Why he’s allegedly fled to Argentina
According to national news reports, he is in the Bahamas and our feds are in contact with authorities there talking about having him brought back. If Madoff got time in the pen, I expect this dude will too. Some criticism going Tom Brady's and Steph Curry's way for encouraging other sports folks to get involved. They made commercials for the guy.
 
Last edited:

Fang1

Member
Oct 1, 2022
141
135
43
Going to regret this, but can we have a link? All I see is FTX setting up a mechanism for people to donate to Ukraine...not for Ukraine to invest in FTX.
 

Attachments

  • C8E7D6C5-E69A-4DF7-BE60-A305C630B804.jpeg
    C8E7D6C5-E69A-4DF7-BE60-A305C630B804.jpeg
    52.6 KB · Views: 9
  • C3F402A6-FAA7-4148-AEB2-E2B9E0B28A5D.jpeg
    C3F402A6-FAA7-4148-AEB2-E2B9E0B28A5D.jpeg
    80.2 KB · Views: 9

mstateglfr

Well-known member
Feb 24, 2008
13,469
3,382
113
You are

 

Leeshouldveflanked

Well-known member
Nov 12, 2016
11,146
4,912
113
Kinda interesting this didn’t come to light until after the midterms.
If you have a pension, you may want to do a little checking to see how much of it is invested in Crypto.
 

PooPopsBaldHead

Well-known member
Dec 15, 2017
7,956
5,009
113
Kinda interesting this didn’t come to light until after the midterms.
If you have a pension, you may want to do a little checking to see how much of it is invested in Crypto.
You mean like this?

Screenshot_20221117-055255.png
It's a big nasty headline for sure... But it's also clickbait. The Ontario Teachers pension is a $240 billion dollar fund. Losing all of their $95 million dollar investment is a loss of less than 1/25th of 1%. It's the equivalent of an individual with $240k to invest buying less than $1.00 of crypto and losing it all... They'll survive.

If they had the entire fund invested in something "safe" like the S&P 500 this year, they would have lost $44 billion or approximately 500 times more than they actually lost on FTX.

Diversity is the name of the game folks. I'd argue that they had the perfect allocation into crypto/FTX. $.25 out of every $1000 allows you to tell all of your crypto bro members you have exposure, yet you never blink an eye at something like this.

The reality is that the Ontario Teachers Pension Plan (along with most other pension plans) is probably destroying the market right now. They are going to have a lot invested with hedge funds and a down year like this is when hedges shine. They haven't reported full year 22' yet, but they were up 1.2% in that first 6 months of 22' while the market was down about 20%.

Ontario Teachers Pension Plan Returns
 

GloryDawg

Well-known member
Mar 3, 2005
14,490
5,337
113

looks like a couple guys are giving it back.
Head ceo have 40 million to dems
Co-ceo gave 24 million to Reps
Hedging bets it seems
I wonder was that 24 million to Republicans used to help put weak Republicans candidates on the ballot to make it easy for the Democrat to win that race. This guy comes from a really strong Democrat family. Now I wonder are the Democrats going to try to save him or are they going to run as far away from as possible.
 

L4Dawg

Well-known member
Oct 27, 2016
6,256
3,495
113
South Sea Bubble = Tulip Bubble = Crypto Bubble. It's basically the same thing. People become enamored with something that has no real worth and bid it up. That always attracts crooks. Something eventually happens to cast doubt on the thing being bid up and the whole house of cards comes crashing down. Hopefully it won't take down real things with it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: patdog

johnson86-1

Well-known member
Aug 22, 2012
12,234
2,463
113
I wonder was that 24 million to Republicans used to help put weak Republicans candidates on the ballot to make it easy for the Democrat to win that race. This guy comes from a really strong Democrat family. Now I wonder are the Democrats going to try to save him or are they going to run as far away from as possible.
Probably so but he was pushing specific legislation that would subject crypto to some regulation but leave it relatively light. He thought this would boost credibility of crypto while also prevent strict regulation from strangling it (or I guess in hindsight from exposing certain exchanges or tokens or currencies as scams). So he probably was supporting some republicans that were already on board with the legislation he was pushing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GloryDawg

MSUDOG24

Active member
Mar 31, 2021
578
376
63
Your generation covered up beautiful hardwood floors with shag carpet. Pipe down.
As a member of said generation, that's well played. If you are going to talk generation smack at least be creative and funny. Well done, I have no idea what "we" were thinking. You can add the cut your own rubber backed "bathroom carpet" kit (available at Sears and other fine retailers) to cover the tile as well.
 

johnson86-1

Well-known member
Aug 22, 2012
12,234
2,463
113
As a member of said generation, that's well played. If you are going to talk generation smack at least be creative and funny. Well done, I have no idea what "we" were thinking. You can add the cut your own rubber backed "bathroom carpet" kit (available at Sears and other fine retailers) to cover the tile as well.

Well, having lived in a 1930's house with wood floors, I think one of the things they were thinking was I can't wait to not get frost bite on my feet walking to the pisser in the morning.
 

OG Goat Holder

Well-known member
Sep 30, 2022
7,701
7,269
113
I'll never understand how a group of Reddit incels got so big and so powerful enough to influence the damn world over crypto. Governments around the world should be looking into this sort of thing and taking notes on how to steer sheep.
 

PooPopsBaldHead

Well-known member
Dec 15, 2017
7,956
5,009
113
As a member of said generation, that's well played. If you are going to talk generation smack at least be creative and funny. Well done, I have no idea what "we" were thinking. You can add the cut your own rubber backed "bathroom carpet" kit (available at Sears and other fine retailers) to cover the tile as well.
Touché

Ugly-Bathroom.jpg
 

Nicephorus123

New member
Nov 17, 2022
9
9
3
This story has been best covered on twitter as that is where the most knowledgable crypto people are most active. Most of mainstream coverage of this has varied from "lacking critical facts" to that blatant puff piece about SBF (Sam Bankman-Fried) NY Times put out. SBF has invested a lot of money in some mainstream media outlets as well as other left leaning causes which probably explains a lot of the coverage. Compare his coverage to the hit piece on Coinbase CEO Brain Armstrong by The NY Times about having a hostile work environment for telling employees to keep politics out of work.

This is probably the best explanation of the time line and what went down pulled from a long multicast twitter thread:

This is more an issue of fraud by an overseas central exchange that has little regulatory oversight and resultant contagion rather than crypto itself. Defi was unaffected by this as it is transparent by nature and carries different risks. Ultimately, I think this will bring down Gary Gensler. The root cause of this is lack of any regulatory clarity by the SEC for crypto exchanges to operate in the U.S. and the resultant movement of capital to these less regulated, less transparent oversea operations. Instead, Gensler is having his enforcement people waste time taking random sh*tcoins no one has heard of to court over being securities. Gensler was also meeting with FTX officials about setting up a sweetheart deal to allow them to operate in the US and completely failing to do any due diligence. Interestingly, the CEO of Alameda (the FTX hedge fund)'s dad is Gensler's old boss at MIT so who knows what kind of inside deals were taking place especially given the degree of democratic political donations by SBF
 
  • Like
Reactions: wdawg44

PooPopsBaldHead

Well-known member
Dec 15, 2017
7,956
5,009
113
This story has been best covered on twitter as that is where the most knowledgable crypto people are most active. Most of mainstream coverage of this has varied from "lacking critical facts" to that blatant puff piece about SBF (Sam Bankman-Fried) NY Times put out. SBF has invested a lot of money in some mainstream media outlets as well as other left leaning causes which probably explains a lot of the coverage. Compare his coverage to the hit piece on Coinbase CEO Brain Armstrong by The NY Times about having a hostile work environment for telling employees to keep politics out of work.

This is probably the best explanation of the time line and what went down pulled from a long multicast twitter thread:

This is more an issue of fraud by an overseas central exchange that has little regulatory oversight and resultant contagion rather than crypto itself. Defi was unaffected by this as it is transparent by nature and carries different risks. Ultimately, I think this will bring down Gary Gensler. The root cause of this is lack of any regulatory clarity by the SEC for crypto exchanges to operate in the U.S. and the resultant movement of capital to these less regulated, less transparent oversea operations. Instead, Gensler is having his enforcement people waste time taking random sh*tcoins no one has heard of to court over being securities. Gensler was also meeting with FTX officials about setting up a sweetheart deal to allow them to operate in the US and completely failing to do any due diligence. Interestingly, the CEO of Alameda (the FTX hedge fund)'s dad is Gensler's old boss at MIT so who knows what kind of inside deals were taking place especially given the degree of democratic political donations by SBF
the mueller report see GIF
 

horshack.sixpack

Well-known member
Oct 30, 2012
9,068
5,072
113
I am trying to figure it out in simple terms...

So basically, people gave Bankman-Fried their money. In return he gave them fake digital money. Then he took the real money, spent it and gave it away? Now there is no real money backing the fake money. They are talking as much as one billion not accounted for. Is that what happened? Also were there no laws broken?
If trying to figure it out = I'd spend 20 minutes listening to someone do a decent job of explaining...

 

IBleedMaroonDawg

Well-known member
Nov 12, 2007
23,154
7,169
113
Said on business network this morning that it was a 90-10 split. 90 D. 10 R.

Interviewed a couple of politicians that were on the way to the Capitol and questions about returning the money was met with word salad mish mash responses.
It was not my intention to devolve this into a democrat or republican post. I was pointing out how much money goes into elections which is absolutely 17ing ridiculous! How about just sharing some of that money with the rest of us non-politicians and let them pass, letting us make up our own damn mind. It's supposed to be a 50-50 split on the advertising according to the law, but it doesn't work out that way does it??
 

Boom Boom

Well-known member
Sep 29, 2022
1,942
1,091
113
It was not my intention to devolve this into a democrat or republican post. I was pointing out how much money goes into elections which is absolutely 17ing ridiculous! How about just sharing some of that money with the rest of us non-politicians and let them pass, letting us make up our own damn mind. It's supposed to be a 50-50 split on the advertising according to the law, but it doesn't work out that way does it??
It's also important to note that most of that "D" money was being spent in the primaries to boost capital friendly Ds against labor friendly Ds. Once it was a corporate D against an R, SBF didn't care who won.
 

IBleedMaroonDawg

Well-known member
Nov 12, 2007
23,154
7,169
113
Well, having lived in a 1930's house with wood floors, I think one of the things they were thinking was I can't wait to not get frost bite on my feet walking to the pisser in the morning.
Yeah and mine had a floor gas furnace in the tiny hallway but you learn to walk around so it didn't burn your damn feet. I don't know if they still use the same furnace, but the house is still there.

Shag carpet, rules, piss off!**
 

Nicephorus123

New member
Nov 17, 2022
9
9
3
I am trying to figure it out in simple terms...

So basically, people gave Bankman-Fried their money. In return he gave them fake digital money. Then he took the real money, spent it and gave it away? Now there is no real money backing the fake money. They are talking as much as one billion not accounted for. Is that what happened? Also were there no laws broken?
There were several dominos that fell that eventually exposed rampant fraud with FTX basically stealing customer deposits. The first domino though was taking large loans against the FTX exchange token, FTT, collateral. FTT has very little liquidity with only a small percent actually circulating/trading so any decent size sell would push price down.

Think of it like this:

If someone asked to borrow $1 from you in return for $2 worth of Chuck E Cheese tokens for you to hold as collateral, you'd be OK if they didn't pay you back as you could sell that small amount of Chuck E Cheese tokens and get at least your loan and probably a little more back in cash. Now if someone offered you $100,000 worth of Chuck E Cheese tokens for a $50,000 loan and chose not to pay you back, you'd be screwed as you would never get that much liquid cash trying to sell that amount of Chuck E Cheese tokens as the buyer pool is so small. Now imagine if you didn't loan that money to an individual but rather your local Chuck E Cheese franchise who has access to enormous amounts of those tokens and you sorta get the idea of what happened initially.
 
Get unlimited access today.

Pick the right plan for you.

Already a member? Login