You know COBOL just turned 60 and is the backbone of our critical banking & govermental systems right?tldr- I am scared and we are 17ed. Maybe not, but probably so.
- Concerned for job security
You know COBOL just turned 60 and is the backbone of our critical banking & govermental systems right?tldr- I am scared and we are 17ed. Maybe not, but probably so.
- Concerned for job security
I get it there is a lot of fear mongering out there and I'd suggest not to just stop but to dive in head first and learn as much as you can about it now.I anxiously await my government check. Damn people, I sit in on IT meetings every week. It's not the end of the world. Damn, just stop.
Hyperion is real.tldr- I am scared and we are 17ed. Maybe not, but probably so.
- Concerned for job security even though I cant imagine it being automated as it is heavily personal. But when the answer to every concern and question is 'we cant even imagine what this will be in 5 years, much less 10', well hell- I cant imagine being made redundant but who knows?!
- Scared for my kids from an employment perspective because what career paths will be safe 5, 10, and 30 years from now? Yeah, job retraining exists and whatnot, but still- it should be a concern to anyone that is a parent.
- Super excited for how it will impact students from an educational perspective. I dont mean papers being written, but the actual legitimate opportunities that AI gives schools right now and in the future to close educational gaps in an inexpensive and hopefully effective manner is really neat to think about.
- It is difficult to get on board with something that even experts are like 'who knows!' when discussing what is coming up. The swift transition from Machine Learning to Deep Learning to Generative AI is crazy to see on a timeline. Fascinating and scary all at once.
The meeting was to help the school district establish AI policies that are realistic, protective, and beneficial to staff and students.
Not likely. In December there were over 9 million job openings in the US. If we can sustain this labor market with today's technology it's not likely AI is going to lead to a world where human labor is not required.I heard Bezos say AI (LLM’s) were a discovery, not an invention. Meaning, we know how invented items behave. We engineered them. We don’t really know how self teaching super intelligence will behave. He says something like “they surprise us everyday”.
I think we’re knocking on the door of a world where human labor is no longer required or replaced something like 100 to 1. We went from using like 30,000,000 horses in American’s industrial base to basically 0 in a decade. Accountants, bank tellers, analyst jobs, truck drivers - you name it. They could all be automated in the coming years.
We could see more progress in the next 5 to 10 years than we did in the previous 5,000. The impact on our social and political systems is terrifying.
Not sure what industry you're in, but over in mine:I sit in on IT meetings every week.
wrong.That is fake and dumb. If you actually use Google AI correctly, it doesn’t give you this result.
ENOUGH!Yep. they will have an agenda. Example A: Google's AI on the US founding fathers
View attachment 534604
But if many/most of the current openings are for low wage positions, dont pay benefits, etc etc...is that really something that supports your comment above?Not likely. In December there were over 9 million job openings in the US. If we can sustain this labor market with today's technology it's not likely AI is going to lead to a world where human labor is not required.
The lower wage jobs are supposed to be the ones that are replaced by AI and automation first. I need to look at which type of jobs comprise the bulk of those 9 million job openings but having a robot or an AI software suite do the job of a nurse, a judge, a project supervisor, a plumber or a police officer is a ways away. Certainly they can and will augment those jobs, but as a total replacement where the people themselves become expendable, that doesn't seem likely. Jobs like fast food workers, retail sales clerks/restocking, hoteliers, 1-800 customer service...those are on the chopping block.But if many/most of the current openings are for low wage positions, dont pay benefits, etc etc...is that really something that supports your comment above?
Low wage jobs without benefits litter my metros local job openings. I am confident it is similar across the country.The lower wage jobs are supposed to be the ones that are replaced by AI and automation first. I need to look at which type of jobs comprise the bulk of those 9 million job openings but having a robot or an AI software suite do the job of a nurse, a judge, a project supervisor, a plumber or a police officer is a ways away. Certainly they can and will augment those jobs, but as a total replacement where the people themselves become expendable, that doesn't seem likely. Jobs like fast food workers, retail sales clerks/restocking, hoteliers, 1-800 customer service...those are on the chopping block.
Hmmm....how has that not been set up like the self-order stations at MickeyD's already?are you saying literal robots will take over the checkin and key process at hotels
This may be one of those things where I don't see it based on how I use hotels.Hmmm....how has that not been set up like the self-order stations at MickeyD's already?
I check in with my credit card, it spits out a keycard...
Dannng, Fishwater....but I usually stay at places that are $120-$150 per night.
Low wage jobs without benefits litter my metros local job openings. I am confident it is similar across the country.
These are good service, retail, trade, etc etc that require in person manual work.
I am unsure how retail sales work is on the chopping block. Or hotel front desk workers. Like...are you saying literal robots will take over the checkin and key process at hotels, and robots will sell me AV equipment or trashy selling body soap at retails stores?
Maybe I am not envisioning this how you are.
I think white collar jobs are more on the chopping block than blue collar ones. Take Microsoft Dynamics for instance. It's not hard for me to see a world where Dynamics is integrated with AI capabilities which will look at a business' historical sales patterns and convert that into a baselevel inventory monitoring service. Honestly, it might do it already. Microsoft Dynamics AI+ would easily be able to understand seasonality and product build-up, slow moving items, gross margin performance, etc. It could be updated with sales forecasts which would make it even more accurate and reliable. It would notify you if an item is below safety stock levels, or if a product is being returned at an unusually high rate. It wouldn't be a stretch for it to be able to place purchase orders with vendors. Or, at least craft them for your approval and submission. That info could be fed into a cash forecast for the business which looks at data from AR or cash collections. It would know that your insurance premiums are due in 6 weeks, but you have the option to switch over to monthly or quarterly installations. It would cost you an extra $832.27 over the course of the year to switch to quarterly and $932.52 to switch to monthly.The lower wage jobs are supposed to be the ones that are replaced by AI and automation first. I need to look at which type of jobs comprise the bulk of those 9 million job openings but having a robot or an AI software suite do the job of a nurse, a judge, a project supervisor, a plumber or a police officer is a ways away. Certainly they can and will augment those jobs, but as a total replacement where the people themselves become expendable, that doesn't seem likely. Jobs like fast food workers, retail sales clerks/restocking, hoteliers, 1-800 customer service...those are on the chopping block.
^^^knows how to hold a grudge***IMO keep Bill Gates and his stolen company as far away from the classroom as possible.