![www.statecollege.com](https://www.statecollege.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Sackett.jpeg)
Penn State Moving Forward with Major Renovations to Sackett Building, Hammond Demolition
The next project in Penn State's extensive College of Engineering master plan will involve major renovations to a historic core campus building and
![www.statecollege.com](https://www.statecollege.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/cropped-278332967_387289996736081_6201219390240552328_n-32x32.png)
They'll tell you where the statue is before they reveal that information.Where will the money printing press be located when Hammond is burned down to the ground? Asking for Neeli, the bot, and Franklin.
![]()
Penn State Moving Forward with Major Renovations to Sackett Building, Hammond Demolition
The next project in Penn State's extensive College of Engineering master plan will involve major renovations to a historic core campus building andwww.statecollege.com
In the offices of Barclays Capital.Where will the money printing press be located when Hammond is burned down to the ground? Asking for Neeli, the bot, and Franklin.
In the offices of Barclays Capital.
It's good for Barclays Capital.Is that good for PSU? Good for PA?
Wait, wut?the Earth's curvature.
The BOT was talking to that genius guy, um, Sam Bankman-Fried. They converted all the PSU endowment into crypto.Where will the money printing press be located when Hammond is burned down to the ground? Asking for Neeli, the bot, and Franklin.
I'm pretty sure that this is not correct. I think long suspension bridge have to account for curvature, but not buildings that are about 1/10 of a mile long. They would be surveying elevation of each footing as the building was constructed, so there should be no error there. I don't see any way they could construct something with a gap after it was built. Buildings are constructed incrementally, so any small offsets along the way would be compensated for during construction.I believe I heard this from one of my professors in the geography department that the Hammond Building was designed and built without taking into account the Earth's curvature. A building of its length needs to accommodate for the roundness of Earth. Because they built it inward from the two ends, when the two ends of the structure were to be joined in the middle there was a small gap left thanks to calcs which, as I stated, neglected curvature. Of course, they found a way to fill in the gap but that gap is still visible when walking along the building even until this day.
If that story is actually true, I always found it amusing (as a geography major) that an edifice primarily used for engineering classes was built without an important geographic aspect included in their building design calcs.
Itās probably not true. But Iāve always remembered the story.I'm pretty sure that this is not correct. I think long suspension bridge have to account for curvature, but not buildings that are about 1/10 of a mile long. They would be surveying elevation of each footing as the building was constructed, so there should be no error there. I don't see any way they could construct something with a gap after it was built. Buildings are constructed incrementally, so any small offsets along the way would be compensated for during construction.
Affirmative.I forget...is it Hammond we're looking at while enjoying a Friday afternoon at Cafe 210?
After I graduated 20+ years ago with an aero degree, I got a call from someone asking how to improve the program. "I told them to remove Hammond Building!" I'm glad they took my advice.I wonder if aerospace son 1 will cry or lol when I send him the Hammond news. Iāll report back
While some beautiful old buildings have been torn down before, nobody is going to miss Hammond.
I think the thing I hated most about Hammond was the fact that there were a couple of floors that you could not traverse from one end of the building to the other.Hammond wqs basically a dump when I first attended class there and visited my advisor (once) nearly 50 years ago and itās an incredibly ugly building so I am ok with thisā¦..
ABsolutely correct I remember the same thingI think the thing I hated most about Hammond was the fact that there were a couple of floors that you could not traverse from one end of the building to the other.
There were times when you might be going from one class or lab to another on the same floor, but still have to go to another floor to get there.
Am I remembering correctly?
I think the thing I hated most about Hammond was the fact that there were a couple of floors that you could not traverse from one end of the building to the other.
There were times when you might be going from one class or lab to another on the same floor, but still have to go to another floor to get there.
Am I remembering correctly?
Son1 is right. Heck it was "about time" in 1981.Son1 said āitās about timeā lol
LMAO. I had Architect roommates and friends that had labs in Hammond. I was supposed to meet them and then we were going to go to either Train Station or Post House and I couldn't figure out how to get to their lab room once I was inside.I think the thing I hated most about Hammond was the fact that there were a couple of floors that you could not traverse from one end of the building to the other.
There were times when you might be going from one class or lab to another on the same floor, but still have to go to another floor to get there.
Am I remembering correctly?
I was, Beam, North Halls. But was gone by '87.Werenāt you northside? Prob shared a studio with moms (art and advertising) 87
1971Son1 is right. Heck it was "about time" in 1981.
Think schreyer bro. Feels good manI canāt wait to see what all these improvements to the engineering department will do to our academictankingsrankings.
![]()
Was she in Beam Hall then? The first and 2nd floor were the Arts and Architecture interest house and was Co-Ed. 3rd and 4th floor were all male.Yup moms 82-87
This schtick is getting old.Where will the money printing press be located when Hammond is burned down to the ground? Asking for Neeli, the bot, and Franklin.
Professors make shiite up all the time to make themselves sound like experts so the students believe them.Itās probably not true. But Iāve always remembered the story.
It is likely an expansion joint. Larger buildings have expansion joints every 300-500 feet, to allow for expansion and contraction due to temperature changes. If I recall, the one design flaw of Hammond was the corridor fire doors appropriately meant to contain fire spread, yet the classrooms had doors leading to the corridor, in the front and rear of the room, that were on either side of the fire doors and always left open.Professors make shiite up all the time to make themselves sound like experts so the students believe them.![]()
However, I am going to go on a scavenger hunt to see if I can find this "gap" or not. I know there is an walkway underpass that goes thru about the center of the building so I will start near there. I live in these parts so will take a looksie some day to see what I can find.
![]()
Donāt think so, she was in the north art studios working on her artWas she in Beam Hall then? The first and 2nd floor were the Arts and Architecture interest house and was Co-Ed. 3rd and 4th floor were all male.
IIRC North Halls had a couple of "interest houses" in their dorms. I think Leete had one as well.
The A&A house though was gone by '85 or at least it wasn't in Beam anymore.
Then sometime in the very late 80's and early 90's they turned the first 2 floors of Beam into some type of administration building.
I think it might be back to being dorms now but they were way, way different rooms than I or probably she remembers.
I had moved about by Briarwood my final year in '85
What I had heard about Hammond (iirc from a friend in Architectural Engineering) was that it was intended to be a taller building, not as long, but they discovered issues concerning the foundation (sinkholes?) And had to reduce the height.I believe I heard this from one of my professors in the geography department that the Hammond Building was designed and built without taking into account the Earth's curvature. A building of its length needs to accommodate for the roundness of Earth. Because they built it inward from the two ends, when the two ends of the structure were to be joined in the middle there was a small gap left thanks to calcs which, as I stated, neglected curvature. Of course, they found a way to fill in the gap but that gap is still visible when walking along the building even until this day.
If that story is actually true, I always found it amusing (as a geography major) that an edifice primarily used for engineering classes was built without an important geographic aspect included in their building design calcs.