Taco's post / thread on "Hail State" responses had me reflecting about the marketing of athletics and branding at MSU as a university as a whole.
In short, it is weak, and it has been for decades. Cartoon logos, empty taglines, and marketing the core strengths of the university are an extension of shortcomings to place intentional effort behind it.
Perhaps the problem lies in the leadership of the university over time, the IHL, the geography and ecosystem of Mississippi, or a combination of all of those -- I can't quite place my finger on it.
Maybe as a land-grant, agricultural engineering research university, this is too difficult for MSU to overcome. However, when I looks at others in that category, I see brands that are easily identifiable and recognizable to those outside the region: Arkansas, Auburn, California, Clemson, Florida, Georgia, LSU, Michigan State, Nebraska, Ohio State, Penn State, Purdue, Tennesee, Texas A&M...to name a few.
As we enter the NIL in the hopes of recruiting students and athletes, I wonder if MSU will follow a path of universities this board enjoys poking fun at (USM, for one). Maybe MSU, its constiuents, and its fans are simply content to be mediocre -- I'm not entirely sure. After many years of watching the university evolve, I had hoped a higher level of transformation than it has realized. I attend events of multiple sports and multiple universities, and the ones that stand out to me are the ones where the events have targeted the students and their participation at the event -- even for the programs that are not "elite" in that sport. I think this is the key for the university as a whole and particulalry in athletics.
Perhaps the previous poster(s) is(are) correct, being in the SEC will not solve our problems, and perhaps, just perhaps, we better start helping ourselves. Rather than being "great," maybe being "good enough" is all that is in the DNA.
Happy we have a Natty in baseball...but, in reality, if we want to be serious (and taken seriously), that is only the first step
In short, it is weak, and it has been for decades. Cartoon logos, empty taglines, and marketing the core strengths of the university are an extension of shortcomings to place intentional effort behind it.
Perhaps the problem lies in the leadership of the university over time, the IHL, the geography and ecosystem of Mississippi, or a combination of all of those -- I can't quite place my finger on it.
Maybe as a land-grant, agricultural engineering research university, this is too difficult for MSU to overcome. However, when I looks at others in that category, I see brands that are easily identifiable and recognizable to those outside the region: Arkansas, Auburn, California, Clemson, Florida, Georgia, LSU, Michigan State, Nebraska, Ohio State, Penn State, Purdue, Tennesee, Texas A&M...to name a few.
As we enter the NIL in the hopes of recruiting students and athletes, I wonder if MSU will follow a path of universities this board enjoys poking fun at (USM, for one). Maybe MSU, its constiuents, and its fans are simply content to be mediocre -- I'm not entirely sure. After many years of watching the university evolve, I had hoped a higher level of transformation than it has realized. I attend events of multiple sports and multiple universities, and the ones that stand out to me are the ones where the events have targeted the students and their participation at the event -- even for the programs that are not "elite" in that sport. I think this is the key for the university as a whole and particulalry in athletics.
Perhaps the previous poster(s) is(are) correct, being in the SEC will not solve our problems, and perhaps, just perhaps, we better start helping ourselves. Rather than being "great," maybe being "good enough" is all that is in the DNA.
Happy we have a Natty in baseball...but, in reality, if we want to be serious (and taken seriously), that is only the first step