Our OL and DL

YellowFeverDawg

New member
Feb 28, 2008
128
0
0
Sorry, if this has already been posted. I may have just gotten woolly, but I didn't think that our lines were supposed to be that bad. I know we lost Brown, and I never thought we had the best in the conference. But absolute worst?

Is this guy crazy, are we worse than I thought, or a little of both.

http://fantasyfootballmaniaxs.alexia.us/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=758&Itemid=52

Mississippi State: This was one of my surprise teams in '07. With a final record of 8-5, they did not disappoint. When everyone was down on Sylvester Croom, I felt strongly that he would start to produce. Last year, it was basically his first year with 'his' recruits on board. You have to hand it to Mr. Croom; he has done it the right way. </p>

Staying the course, instigating his schemes, and recruiting high school talent instead of quick fix JUCO's. He now enters his fifth season with 14 starters returning from a bowl-winning Bulldog team. Things should keep going forward, right?
Not so fast. The Bulldogs in '08 won't be able to jump up and surprise people like they did to Auburn, Alabama, and Kentucky last year. They will get people's respect this year.</p>

On offense, Wesley Carroll returns at QB. As a freshman, Carroll showed some definite signs that he could be a very good QB in the SEC. He is just plain raw. The Bulldogs will continue to ebb and flow with his growing pains this year. At RB, Anthony Dixon is one of the SEC's best. Not flashy, not awe-inspiring, he simply gets the job done. At WR, the Bulldogs will be much the same. Not flashy, not awe-inspiring, but effective. </p>

If this unit is to improve, then Co-Eric Riley needs to produce. It is that simple. <span style="font-weight: bold;">On the OL, they return one of the SEC's worst.</span> This is primarily why I have them pegged 5th after an 8-5 come-uppance season. Nary a stud amongst them, and for a team that will likely need to rely on running the football to be successful, this just doesn't seem very fruitful.</p>

On defense, they return the best DB in the entire country. Derek Pegues. The guy simply makes plays, and he will be the stalwart for the Bulldog D again in '08. Jamar Chaney and Dominic Douglas are solid LBs, <span style="font-weight: bold;">but their front four are simply atrocious. Possibly the worst in the conference</span>. Unless Jessie Bowman can step up big time, this will be a huge pain point for a defense that was very opportunistic last year. The Bulldogs 'back' seven must play brilliantly to cover up their shortcomings up front. That isn't a good recipe in the SEC. </p>

<span style="font-weight: bold;">When push comes to shove, I hate putting these guys 5th, but when you have one of the worst OL's and DL's in the league, it is simply a blessing that you aren't in the cellar. Even with a manageable schedule, I very much see the Bulldogs struggling to get to a bowl game in '08. Too many more teams that can whip them upfront. </span></p>
 

Coach34

New member
Jul 20, 2012
20,283
1
0
9 of the 12 teams in the conference have 3 or more starters returning on the OL, it would be hard to say we would be any better than 10th. And there are some very good DL's in the conference. We dont seem to have alot of depth along the defensive front. Interested to see how good we'll be there.
 

diehard4dawgs

New member
May 23, 2006
402
0
0
<p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><span style="FONT-FAMILY: Arial">On the O-Line front, we will be just as good this year.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span> Anyone who watched a game last year saw that we rotated the entire second string line in on several occasions without missing a beat.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span> In fact, some of our most impressive drives came with the second string line in the game.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span> This is one area that Croom has done an excellent job of building a solid 2 deep of SEC caliber players.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span> As for the D-Line, I am taking a wait and see approach.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span></span></p>
 

rebelrouseri

New member
Jan 24, 2007
1,460
0
0

patdog

Well-known member
May 28, 2007
50,203
14,980
113
they'll both definitely be in the lower half of the conference, and probably both in the lower third. Losing the two Browns will hurt us pretty bad on both sides of the ball. He's right that we don't have a single true stud lineman on either side of the ball. I do think we have enough decent players to have decent lines though.
 
G

Goat Holder

Guest
we don't get tired. And people don't realize that the two-deep problem at LT and on the DL will be filled by incoming recruits. We'll be fine.

And Croom's one of the better judges of talent out there. Phillip Freeman will play this year as well, probably back up Sherrod. We signed a **** ton of DL prospects last year, some of them will be ready to play now.
 

Irondawg

Active member
Dec 2, 2007
2,576
205
63
Well, the thing is that we don't have a lot of "studs" on either line right now.

I think Sherrod will be an all-SEC LT at some point, but while the rest of the guys aren't bad, we aren't brimming with NFL talent there. Or at least we haven't shown it yet.

On the DL, we don't have a proven pass rusher on or DT's are serviceable, but once again there's not a guy opposing coaches fear. I certainly don't think we're "atrocious" as the article states. More just solid, but unspectacular.

Last year was the first year I can remember when I couldn't rationalize blaming the offense on the poor play of the OL. Before that there was no chance of a passing game b/c the QB never had time to throw. Last year was different and I expect more of the same this year.

On the DL, Love and Bowman just need to hold their ground and we need to find some guys who can get the job done at DE and rush the passer.
 
Get unlimited access today.

Pick the right plan for you.

Already a member? Login