Paul Finebaum about football

ETK99

Well-known member
Jul 30, 2019
6,692
8,993
112
NIL isn't going away just because of the settlement money. Nothing is going to change with the settlement as far as things go. Just makes it harder on us because of our smaller budget.
 

Bulldawg77

Well-known member
Dec 1, 2019
2,018
3,085
108
Ok. Let's throw out some numbers. Feel free to tell me where my numbers are wrong and/or offer your own theory.

In 2024:
  • Texas reportedly spent ~$22.3M on NIL.
  • Mississippi State spent ~$6.5M.
  • That's a $15.8M gap in NIL investment—massive disparity in roster resources.
Under revenue sharing:
  • All SEC schools will likely spend around $15M on football players through formal revenue sharing.
  • Mississippi State jumps from $6.5M to ~$15M.
  • Texas also adds $15M in revenue sharing and supplements with NIL.
So, yes—the relative spending gap shrinks.

Even if Texas still has a bigger total player compensation pot (say, $15M + $10M in NIL = $25M), the difference between them and Mississippi State is more like $10M, not the $15M+ we saw when NIL was the only vehicle for player payments.

Why This Might “Level the Field” (To a Degree):
  • Baseline parity: Revenue sharing creates a floor that everyone reaches.
  • NIL becomes additive, not the only driver of talent acquisition.
  • Middle/lower-tier programs become more competitive in recruiting because they can offer a guaranteed, structured revenue-sharing payout.
Caveats:
  • Texas, Georgia, Alabama, etc., will still outspend the bottom half via NIL, facilities, coaching salaries, etc.
  • NIL won’t go away—boosters and collectives will still matter.
  • Some schools might be more restricted by Title IX compliance, legal risks, or institutional willingness to spend.
Big picture, revenue sharing could:
  • Compress the extreme gaps between the top and bottom of the SEC.
  • Give mid-tier programs a fighting chance in recruiting.
  • Introduce more structure and predictability to player compensation.
Wher and why are using 6.5??? We have a lot more than that fir the 24/25 recruiting cycle portal included
 

Bulldawg77

Well-known member
Dec 1, 2019
2,018
3,085
108
NIL isn't going away just because of the settlement money. Nothing is going to change with the settlement as far as things go. Just makes it harder on us because of our smaller budget.
Collectives are going away any NIL deal will have to through a clearing house. Players will have a market value in the clearing house
 

H8arebel

New member
Feb 12, 2023
9
10
3
Gotta agree with Paul Finebaum here, even though he’s a giant douche.

Our fans care way more about the niche sports at Mississippi State, than the one sport that actually would make an economic impact on the city of Starkville and University as a whole. Football is the only reason we are currently in the SEC and the only reason we have anything that would qualify as “nice”.

You can point to the decisions made in late 2019 early 2020 by State & OM AD’s for the ever growing gap between the two schools and programs now. Unfortunately, instead of digging deep and supporting football to get us out of this hole, we will continue to ***** and complain until we are sunk forever.

We are not a serious program.
You know some people like more than one sport and I apologize if you played right field in little league but get over it. We should strive for every team to perform well. You know for all the money om spent on football they didn’t play for all the marbles. They only managed to beat poor ole us by 10 and 12 pts last two years. If not for some bs roughing the qb call 2 years ago they probably wouldn’t have won that game. If we put all the money from all the sports together we probably wouldn’t win many recruiting battles in today’s world. Be less douchey downing a sport that does bring positive vibes to msu.
 

ETK99

Well-known member
Jul 30, 2019
6,692
8,993
112
Collectives are going away any NIL deal will have to through a clearing house. Players will have a market value in the clearing house
And again, those with NIL money will still get those players paid while we can't afford them. It's not going to change. We threw our NIL under the BC and no longer even control the sports we contribute to. It's not a draft and free agency will still be nonstop. There's no salary cap to stop the spending by a limited number of teams either.
 

Bagman.sixpack

New member
Jan 13, 2021
82
7
8
Gotta agree with Paul Finebaum here, even though he’s a giant douche.

Our fans care way more about the niche sports at Mississippi State, than the one sport that actually would make an economic impact on the city of Starkville and University as a whole. Football is the only reason we are currently in the SEC and the only reason we have anything that would qualify as “nice”.

You can point to the decisions made in late 2019 early 2020 by State & OM AD’s for the ever growing gap between the two schools and programs now. Unfortunately, instead of digging deep and supporting football to get us out of this hole, we will continue to ***** and complain until we are sunk forever.

We are not a serious program.

I don’t think fans care more about the niche sports. They care about a serviceable product. Which we have not had recently in football.

The niche sports have been more competitive, so naturally people gravitate towards those.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MagnoliaHunter

Bagman.sixpack

New member
Jan 13, 2021
82
7
8
Hard to believe that as recently as 8 years ago, MSU and UM football programs were virtual equals and had been for 30 years. Since then, they've literally done everything right while we've done everything wrong. We are at least a decade behind, if not more.

And the difference from those years until now are all due to leadership. Poor and ineffective leadership. From who, I do t know but that’s the difference.
 
  • Like
Reactions: patdog

Bulldawg77

Well-known member
Dec 1, 2019
2,018
3,085
108
And again, those with NIL money will still get those players paid while we can't afford them. It's not going to change. We threw our NIL under the BC and no longer even control the sports we contribute to. It's not a draft and free agency will still be nonstop. There's no salary cap to stop the spending by a limited number of teams either.
Every school is bringing the collective in house…. SEF/BC will be working on Rev share BI will be recruiting business to help with actual NIL deals. And the clearing house will go through each deal and have stiff penalties from my understanding including fines if they pay above market value . Each deal will have to go through this. No more collectives pay for play
 

eckie1

Well-known member
Jun 23, 2007
3,487
2,896
113
It sucks that Leach passed away and I don’t think anyone would debate now with the benefit of hindsight that we would’ve been better off in 2023 and 2024 with Leach in charge than the results that actually happened. How much better? I don’t know exactly, but Mike Leach isn’t going 1-15 in SEC play with 14 of those losses by double digits.

Our problem, to me, is we had two different coaching changes (Mullen and Leach) that happened when the program was not a disaster, and we turned it into a disaster by chasing upside before we made sure our foundation was still steady.
We lost both Mullen and Leach the seasons before the best teams they’d ever assembled here took the field. Then we made two disastrous hires to replace both and literally got nothing out of either team. Every bit of the blame for both is on the plastic man that lives by the pond.

Leach’s system was always gonna leave a crater in the program unless we kept running it. We hired the wrong guy and he abandoned it completely. And that’s why we have had 2 shìtty seasons.

As for falling behind the rest of the SEC…. We are terrified of hiring known character risks that we know will win. Look at the pigs and Petrino, Rebs and Kiffin, Auburn and Freeze, etc. There’s no such thing as cheating these days, and absolutely no penalty for hiring an abject piece of shìt to coach. Leach was a knife in a gunfight compared to each of these guys, whether you loved him or not. We need a win-at-all-costs scumbag like the other guys have.
 

85Bears

Well-known member
Jan 12, 2020
2,592
2,530
108
Th
We lost both Mullen and Leach the seasons before the best teams they’d ever assembled here took the field. Then we made two disastrous hires to replace both and literally got nothing out of either team. Every bit of the blame for both is on the plastic man that lives by the pond.

Leach’s system was always gonna leave a crater in the program unless we kept running it. We hired the wrong guy and he abandoned it completely. And that’s why we have had 2 shìtty seasons.

As for falling behind the rest of the SEC…. We are terrified of hiring known character risks that we know will win. Look at the pigs and Petrino, Rebs and Kiffin, Auburn and Freeze, etc. There’s no such thing as cheating these days, and absolutely no penalty for hiring an abject piece of shìt to coach. Leach was a knife in a gunfight compared to each of these guys, whether you loved him or not. We need a win-at-all-costs scumbag like the other guys have.
The Programs each respective coach took over was the knife or the gun not the coach. Like it or not we are the poorest school in the sec in the nil era. Leach would be hell on wheels at Auburn. Freeze would struggle to go 6-6 here.
 

eckie1

Well-known member
Jun 23, 2007
3,487
2,896
113
Th

The Programs each respective coach took over was the knife or the gun not the coach. Like it or not we are the poorest school in the sec in the nil era. Leach would be hell on wheels at Auburn. Freeze would struggle to go 6-6 here.
A) Big money schools would never hire Leach. They can just buy their players and not have to scheme around the gaps like his system did.

B) Freeze is barely going 6-6 at Auburn.
 

85Bears

Well-known member
Jan 12, 2020
2,592
2,530
108
A) Big money schools would never hire Leach. They can just buy their players and not have to scheme around the gaps like his system did.

B) Freeze is barely going 6-6 at Auburn.
whether big money schools would hire Leach or not is not the question, it’s whether an nil poor program limits the coach, in this case it certainly does. Leach at Auburn getting unlimited nil to assemble his O line, quarterback of choice and receiving corps would be hell on wheels. There isn’t a bigger money school right now than Texas Tech.

right now none of the top in state players can be kept in this program, it’s not like the old days where they would stay in state for a car. A guaranteed 500 k contract is what it takes and we will never have that money like Auburn and other schools do.

its this program and The lack of money that would determine whether the coach is a knife or gun. leach went 11-2 at tech playing in the best division in football at the time, the big 12 south. Took a 9-40 program to 11-2 at wsu. He sure as hell could assemble a winner with unlimited nil money in this era.
 

Rezdog

Member
Oct 25, 2015
419
234
43
He obviously reads our 🐗

Gotta agree with Paul Finebaum here, even though he’s a giant douche.

Our fans care way more about the niche sports at Mississippi State, than the one sport that actually would make an economic impact on the city of Starkville and University as a whole. Football is the only reason we are currently in the SEC and the only reason we have anything that would qualify as “nice”.

You can point to the decisions made in late 2019 early 2020 by State & OM AD’s for the ever growing gap between the two schools and programs now. Unfortunately, instead of digging deep and supporting football to get us out of this hole, we will continue to ***** and complain until we are sunk forever.

We are not a serious program.
Did he not hear about our led lights.
 

eckie1

Well-known member
Jun 23, 2007
3,487
2,896
113
whether big money schools would hire Leach or not is not the question, it’s whether an nil poor program limits the coach, in this case it certainly does. Leach at Auburn getting unlimited nil to assemble his O line, quarterback of choice and receiving corps would be hell on wheels. There isn’t a bigger money school right now than Texas Tech.

right now none of the top in state players can be kept in this program, it’s not like the old days where they would stay in state for a car. A guaranteed 500 k contract is what it takes and we will never have that money like Auburn and other schools do.

its this program and The lack of money that would determine whether the coach is a knife or gun. leach went 11-2 at tech playing in the best division in football at the time, the big 12 south. Took a 9-40 program to 11-2 at wsu. He sure as hell could assemble a winner with unlimited nil money in this era.
I’m done arguing about a subject I couldn’t care lesss about. But, even Mullen wouldn’t be vacuuming in recruits at Florida because he hates recruiting, much like Leach did. All the money in the world wouldn’t change that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Cooterpoot

patdog

Well-known member
May 28, 2007
51,368
17,258
113
The problem is that even if the gap shrinks (which it won’t), there still will be a gap. Any gap at all is bad news for MSU. We had enough struggles to begin with on the recruiting front without the portal and NIL, just due to Starkville / MS in general / lack of history / stadium and facilities, etc. We have to pay significantly above market as it is.

If what you say comes to fruition, I can see it helping the Auburns and Arkansas types, but it’s not going to do much for us at all.
I think the gap either stays the same or gets bigger after revenue sharing. Texas will just add the $15M to the $22M they're paying now to get to $37M. State will likely only add $8.5M to the $6.5 we're spending now to get to the $15M minimum, and the gap grows. But best case State adds $15M to get to $21.5M and the gap stays the same.
And the difference from those years until now are all due to leadership. Poor and ineffective leadership. From who, I do t know but that’s the difference.
it starts at the top.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HRMSU

patdog

Well-known member
May 28, 2007
51,368
17,258
113
We lost both Mullen and Leach the seasons before the best teams they’d ever assembled here took the field. Then we made two disastrous hires to replace both and literally got nothing out of either team. Every bit of the blame for both is on the plastic man that lives by the pond.

Leach’s system was always gonna leave a crater in the program unless we kept running it. We hired the wrong guy and he abandoned it completely. And that’s why we have had 2 shìtty seasons.

As for falling behind the rest of the SEC…. We are terrified of hiring known character risks that we know will win. Look at the pigs and Petrino, Rebs and Kiffin, Auburn and Freeze, etc. There’s no such thing as cheating these days, and absolutely no penalty for hiring an abject piece of shìt to coach. Leach was a knife in a gunfight compared to each of these guys, whether you loved him or not. We need a win-at-all-costs scumbag like the other guys have.
We could have hired Kiffin when we hired Moorhead. He had just gone 11-3 in his 1st season at Florida freaking Atlantic & stayed there 2 mir years.
 
  • Like
Reactions: eckie1

85Bears

Well-known member
Jan 12, 2020
2,592
2,530
108
I’m done arguing about a subject I couldn’t care lesss about. But, even Mullen wouldn’t be vacuuming in recruits at Florida because he hates recruiting, much like Leach did. All the money in the world wouldn’t change that.
Mullen wouldn’t be getting many recruits at State right now. $$$ = recruiting
 

Bulldawg77

Well-known member
Dec 1, 2019
2,018
3,085
108
I think the gap either stays the same or gets bigger after revenue sharing. Texas will just add the $15M to the $22M they're paying now to get to $37M. State will likely only add $8.5M to the $6.5 we're spending now to get to the $15M minimum, and the gap grows. But best case State adds $15M to get to $21.5M and the gap stays the same.

it starts at the top.
Stop with this BS 6.5. We are miles ahead of 6.5. No thanks to you, who has admitted they stopped giving.
We are in a very competitive position.. With the 21 Rev share and what we have and will be an even bigger player. Stop with we are some sister of the poor
 

Rezdog

Member
Oct 25, 2015
419
234
43
These are the same people that wanted Leach fired during the 9-4 season. They cheered arnett firing Leachs staff. Funny how nfl films has a feature film on Mike leach where he is called a brilliant innovator who changed the game by nfl GMs and head coaches. But you know the Louisville high school coach , obese34 and the rest of the low iq crowd know better.
You put some respect on that man's name. He's an assistant high school coach.
 

Rezdog

Member
Oct 25, 2015
419
234
43
The problem is that even if the gap shrinks (which it won’t), there still will be a gap. Any gap at all is bad news for MSU. We had enough struggles to begin with on the recruiting front without the portal and NIL, just due to Starkville / MS in general / lack of history / stadium and facilities, etc. We have to pay significantly above market as it is.

If what you say comes to fruition, I can see it helping the Auburns and Arkansas types, but it’s not going to do much for us at all.
There's always been a money gap my guy.
 

Rezdog

Member
Oct 25, 2015
419
234
43
We lost both Mullen and Leach the seasons before the best teams they’d ever assembled here took the field. Then we made two disastrous hires to replace both and literally got nothing out of either team. Every bit of the blame for both is on the plastic man that lives by the pond.

Leach’s system was always gonna leave a crater in the program unless we kept running it. We hired the wrong guy and he abandoned it completely. And that’s why we have had 2 shìtty seasons.

As for falling behind the rest of the SEC…. We are terrified of hiring known character risks that we know will win. Look at the pigs and Petrino, Rebs and Kiffin, Auburn and Freeze, etc. There’s no such thing as cheating these days, and absolutely no penalty for hiring an abject piece of shìt to coach. Leach was a knife in a gunfight compared to each of these guys, whether you loved him or not. We need a win-at-all-costs scumbag like the other guys have.
I'll give you the 2018 team, but the 2023 team had about 2 more wins tops with Leach.
 

Rezdog

Member
Oct 25, 2015
419
234
43
Th

The Programs each respective coach took over was the knife or the gun not the coach. Like it or not we are the poorest school in the sec in the nil era. Leach would be hell on wheels at Auburn. Freeze would struggle to go 6-6 here.
Freeze is struggling to go 6-6 at Auburn
 

Called3rdstrikedawg

Well-known member
May 7, 2016
1,157
1,066
113
I choose football over all other sports at State. Up until this season all my money went to that sport. I just made a decision not to contribute. I will probably buy tickets to a road game and maybe one home game. When you go 2-10 and have one of the worst defenses in the country and make no changes to the defensive coaching staff. That bugs me. Even Mullen had enough sense to get rid of a crappy DC after one season. This defense was worse than Peter Sirmon defense. I hope Hutzler learned from last season and comes out and make me eat crow.
He did not. He will not.
 

TheBannerM

Active member
Nov 30, 2024
401
457
63
Well, we have the smallest budget in the SEC, but we act like we can out-spend blue bloods in a non-revenue sport like baseball. It makes State fans feel good to think we can throw money around, but with our limited budget it’s a huge mistake. When the reaping comes, NO ONE will care how good our baseball program is. We will end up with the best baseball facilities in the Sun Belt.
 

dickiedawg

Well-known member
Feb 22, 2008
3,828
587
113
There's always been a gap. In our best years, there was a gap between us and the top of the SEC. And we managed to win 7-10 games.
This is what I keep coming back to. We’ve never had the same resources as the big schools. We’ve never recruited in the top 10, 15 or even 20 consistently. This is not new.
But for close to 15 years we were pretty good. Consistently made bowl games, sometimes even decent bowl games. And it wasn’t just because we had the greatest coach in history. Mullen was great, but we made 5 straight bowls *after* he left.
And I know none of that was after NIL became the raging poo show it is now. But the point is that we were poor then (relative to the SEC) and we’re poor now. Our place in the pecking order hasn’t changed. But our mentality has.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pseudonym
Nov 20, 2023
254
92
28
The adblocker that works on this sight keeps Athlons articles away too.....

I Cant See Beavis And Butthead GIF by Paramount+
Just get Brave Browser, it handles all the ads and I never have to worry about ad blocker problems. Plus it’s probably the best browser anyhow.
 

GloryDawg

Well-known member
Mar 3, 2005
16,178
8,024
113
So far he’s 0 for 2 on that. Funny how things change when his recruiting tactics get legalized & levels the playing field.
I believe that very same thing drove Saban out of the game. He still got his guys, but a lot of schools were able to get into the game. He lost his on-field advantage. I hope Bama fans understands that. I really hope they don't and go through about 10 different coaches.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MagnoliaHunter

Choctaw Dawg

Member
May 21, 2017
434
91
28
2016:

Stricklin leaves for Florida. Instead of having a serious search for an AD, we promote our baseball coach, even after the Clarion Ledger gets ran through the mud by State's media department saying that Cohen wasn't a candidate.

This is problematic, Mullen and Cohen already had a, lets say, a difficult relationship before he became Mullens boss. Mullen then finally bolts a year later after a successful year.

2017-2019

Cohen hires Moorhead (the current head coach of the worst team in the FBS and recently thrown under academic probation) after Mullen bolts. Hot boards at the time include names such as Napier, Sarkesian, Clawson, Pruitt, and Satterfield. His tenure includes Tutorgate (noticing a pattern with Moorhead?) and poorly coached players. He shows his *** at a press conference after the Egg Bowl, Cohen panics, we fire him a month later and are behind the 8 ball hiring a coach that cycle.

2020-2022

Leach era starts rough but shows promise toward the end. During this tenure NIL is given the free for all from the NCAA, our AD thinks we will get by signing baseball while other schools are going scorched earth jumping on board with established collectives. We essentially brought a pillow to a gun fight early on and are still behind the eight ball with it. Leach passes away and we do not have a AD in place. Football boosters push for the hiring of Arnett and it gets Keenums golden seal of approval. He is fired less than a year later.

2023-Now

Lebby, a first time head coach, is brought to do a multi year cleanup. With this comes also a first time Defensive coodinator who folks at Bama had never hardly heard of. The results of a multi year **** show come due the next year in 2024.

Yeah, we aren't a serious program.
 

horshack.sixpack

Well-known member
Oct 30, 2012
9,941
6,182
113

Paul Finebaum talked about our football team not being fully committed and about the apparatus around him not being strong enough.
For some reason, I doubt PAUWWWWWWLLLLLL has any special knowledge about the commitment level of our football team. If he is asserting that our athletic department does not appear to be exhibiting traits that lead to creating winning programs, I think that may very well be true, and so obvious as to not be newsworthy.
 
Dec 9, 2018
472
177
43
I believe that very same thing drove Saban out of the game. He still got his guys, but a lot of schools were able to get into the game. He lost his on-field advantage. I hope Bama fans understands that. I really hope they don't and go through about 10 different coaches.
I hope they go through one coach a year for the next 75 years.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GloryDawg

patdog

Well-known member
May 28, 2007
51,368
17,258
113
For some reason, I doubt PAUWWWWWWLLLLLL has any special knowledge about the commitment level of our football team. If he is asserting that our athletic department does not appear to be exhibiting traits that lead to creating winning programs, I think that may very well be true, and so obvious as to not be newsworthy.
I don't think it takes any special knowledge to know our commitment level in football is at an all time low.
 

ETK99

Well-known member
Jul 30, 2019
6,692
8,993
112
Every school is bringing the collective in house…. SEF/BC will be working on Rev share BI will be recruiting business to help with actual NIL deals. And the clearing house will go through each deal and have stiff penalties from my understanding including fines if they pay above market value . Each deal will have to go through this. No more collectives pay for play
That's not what's going happen. It's basically base pay plus NIL. KY just privatized their stuff. And the pay ranking stuff won't happen but even if it does, we can't pay the big price tags still, so same thing we see now. Until MSU starts giving a crap about football and marketing etc. revenue won't improve. Those facility improvements are going to be hard to do anytime soon too. We don't even do naming rights yet like a lot of schools.