Wher and why are using 6.5??? We have a lot more than that fir the 24/25 recruiting cycle portal includedOk. Let's throw out some numbers. Feel free to tell me where my numbers are wrong and/or offer your own theory.
In 2024:
Under revenue sharing:
- Texas reportedly spent ~$22.3M on NIL.
- Mississippi State spent ~$6.5M.
- That's a $15.8M gap in NIL investment—massive disparity in roster resources.
So, yes—the relative spending gap shrinks.
- All SEC schools will likely spend around $15M on football players through formal revenue sharing.
- Mississippi State jumps from $6.5M to ~$15M.
- Texas also adds $15M in revenue sharing and supplements with NIL.
Even if Texas still has a bigger total player compensation pot (say, $15M + $10M in NIL = $25M), the difference between them and Mississippi State is more like $10M, not the $15M+ we saw when NIL was the only vehicle for player payments.
Why This Might “Level the Field” (To a Degree):
Caveats:
- Baseline parity: Revenue sharing creates a floor that everyone reaches.
- NIL becomes additive, not the only driver of talent acquisition.
- Middle/lower-tier programs become more competitive in recruiting because they can offer a guaranteed, structured revenue-sharing payout.
Big picture, revenue sharing could:
- Texas, Georgia, Alabama, etc., will still outspend the bottom half via NIL, facilities, coaching salaries, etc.
- NIL won’t go away—boosters and collectives will still matter.
- Some schools might be more restricted by Title IX compliance, legal risks, or institutional willingness to spend.
- Compress the extreme gaps between the top and bottom of the SEC.
- Give mid-tier programs a fighting chance in recruiting.
- Introduce more structure and predictability to player compensation.
Collectives are going away any NIL deal will have to through a clearing house. Players will have a market value in the clearing houseNIL isn't going away just because of the settlement money. Nothing is going to change with the settlement as far as things go. Just makes it harder on us because of our smaller budget.
That's the number I've seen for 2024 football only.Wher and why are using 6.5??? We have a lot more than that fir the 24/25 recruiting cycle portal included
You know some people like more than one sport and I apologize if you played right field in little league but get over it. We should strive for every team to perform well. You know for all the money om spent on football they didn’t play for all the marbles. They only managed to beat poor ole us by 10 and 12 pts last two years. If not for some bs roughing the qb call 2 years ago they probably wouldn’t have won that game. If we put all the money from all the sports together we probably wouldn’t win many recruiting battles in today’s world. Be less douchey downing a sport that does bring positive vibes to msu.Gotta agree with Paul Finebaum here, even though he’s a giant douche.
Our fans care way more about the niche sports at Mississippi State, than the one sport that actually would make an economic impact on the city of Starkville and University as a whole. Football is the only reason we are currently in the SEC and the only reason we have anything that would qualify as “nice”.
You can point to the decisions made in late 2019 early 2020 by State & OM AD’s for the ever growing gap between the two schools and programs now. Unfortunately, instead of digging deep and supporting football to get us out of this hole, we will continue to ***** and complain until we are sunk forever.
We are not a serious program.
Happens all the time especially on the EllipticalIf you are in the gym working out and you fart but you can't hear it because of headphones, did you still fart?
And again, those with NIL money will still get those players paid while we can't afford them. It's not going to change. We threw our NIL under the BC and no longer even control the sports we contribute to. It's not a draft and free agency will still be nonstop. There's no salary cap to stop the spending by a limited number of teams either.Collectives are going away any NIL deal will have to through a clearing house. Players will have a market value in the clearing house
Gotta agree with Paul Finebaum here, even though he’s a giant douche.
Our fans care way more about the niche sports at Mississippi State, than the one sport that actually would make an economic impact on the city of Starkville and University as a whole. Football is the only reason we are currently in the SEC and the only reason we have anything that would qualify as “nice”.
You can point to the decisions made in late 2019 early 2020 by State & OM AD’s for the ever growing gap between the two schools and programs now. Unfortunately, instead of digging deep and supporting football to get us out of this hole, we will continue to ***** and complain until we are sunk forever.
We are not a serious program.
Hard to believe that as recently as 8 years ago, MSU and UM football programs were virtual equals and had been for 30 years. Since then, they've literally done everything right while we've done everything wrong. We are at least a decade behind, if not more.
Keenum owns itAnd the difference from those years until now are all due to leadership. Poor and ineffective leadership. From who, I do t know but that’s the difference.
That’s a number someone made up from the 23/24 cycle. I know Charlie is not gonna give a number but I can say with confidence that we were miles ahead of 6.5.That's the number I've seen for 2024 football only.
What number have you seen?
Every school is bringing the collective in house…. SEF/BC will be working on Rev share BI will be recruiting business to help with actual NIL deals. And the clearing house will go through each deal and have stiff penalties from my understanding including fines if they pay above market value . Each deal will have to go through this. No more collectives pay for playAnd again, those with NIL money will still get those players paid while we can't afford them. It's not going to change. We threw our NIL under the BC and no longer even control the sports we contribute to. It's not a draft and free agency will still be nonstop. There's no salary cap to stop the spending by a limited number of teams either.
We lost both Mullen and Leach the seasons before the best teams they’d ever assembled here took the field. Then we made two disastrous hires to replace both and literally got nothing out of either team. Every bit of the blame for both is on the plastic man that lives by the pond.It sucks that Leach passed away and I don’t think anyone would debate now with the benefit of hindsight that we would’ve been better off in 2023 and 2024 with Leach in charge than the results that actually happened. How much better? I don’t know exactly, but Mike Leach isn’t going 1-15 in SEC play with 14 of those losses by double digits.
Our problem, to me, is we had two different coaching changes (Mullen and Leach) that happened when the program was not a disaster, and we turned it into a disaster by chasing upside before we made sure our foundation was still steady.
The Programs each respective coach took over was the knife or the gun not the coach. Like it or not we are the poorest school in the sec in the nil era. Leach would be hell on wheels at Auburn. Freeze would struggle to go 6-6 here.We lost both Mullen and Leach the seasons before the best teams they’d ever assembled here took the field. Then we made two disastrous hires to replace both and literally got nothing out of either team. Every bit of the blame for both is on the plastic man that lives by the pond.
Leach’s system was always gonna leave a crater in the program unless we kept running it. We hired the wrong guy and he abandoned it completely. And that’s why we have had 2 shìtty seasons.
As for falling behind the rest of the SEC…. We are terrified of hiring known character risks that we know will win. Look at the pigs and Petrino, Rebs and Kiffin, Auburn and Freeze, etc. There’s no such thing as cheating these days, and absolutely no penalty for hiring an abject piece of shìt to coach. Leach was a knife in a gunfight compared to each of these guys, whether you loved him or not. We need a win-at-all-costs scumbag like the other guys have.
A) Big money schools would never hire Leach. They can just buy their players and not have to scheme around the gaps like his system did.Th
The Programs each respective coach took over was the knife or the gun not the coach. Like it or not we are the poorest school in the sec in the nil era. Leach would be hell on wheels at Auburn. Freeze would struggle to go 6-6 here.
whether big money schools would hire Leach or not is not the question, it’s whether an nil poor program limits the coach, in this case it certainly does. Leach at Auburn getting unlimited nil to assemble his O line, quarterback of choice and receiving corps would be hell on wheels. There isn’t a bigger money school right now than Texas Tech.A) Big money schools would never hire Leach. They can just buy their players and not have to scheme around the gaps like his system did.
B) Freeze is barely going 6-6 at Auburn.
He obviously reads our![]()
Did he not hear about our led lights.Gotta agree with Paul Finebaum here, even though he’s a giant douche.
Our fans care way more about the niche sports at Mississippi State, than the one sport that actually would make an economic impact on the city of Starkville and University as a whole. Football is the only reason we are currently in the SEC and the only reason we have anything that would qualify as “nice”.
You can point to the decisions made in late 2019 early 2020 by State & OM AD’s for the ever growing gap between the two schools and programs now. Unfortunately, instead of digging deep and supporting football to get us out of this hole, we will continue to ***** and complain until we are sunk forever.
We are not a serious program.
Keenum owns it
I’m done arguing about a subject I couldn’t care lesss about. But, even Mullen wouldn’t be vacuuming in recruits at Florida because he hates recruiting, much like Leach did. All the money in the world wouldn’t change that.whether big money schools would hire Leach or not is not the question, it’s whether an nil poor program limits the coach, in this case it certainly does. Leach at Auburn getting unlimited nil to assemble his O line, quarterback of choice and receiving corps would be hell on wheels. There isn’t a bigger money school right now than Texas Tech.
right now none of the top in state players can be kept in this program, it’s not like the old days where they would stay in state for a car. A guaranteed 500 k contract is what it takes and we will never have that money like Auburn and other schools do.
its this program and The lack of money that would determine whether the coach is a knife or gun. leach went 11-2 at tech playing in the best division in football at the time, the big 12 south. Took a 9-40 program to 11-2 at wsu. He sure as hell could assemble a winner with unlimited nil money in this era.
I think the gap either stays the same or gets bigger after revenue sharing. Texas will just add the $15M to the $22M they're paying now to get to $37M. State will likely only add $8.5M to the $6.5 we're spending now to get to the $15M minimum, and the gap grows. But best case State adds $15M to get to $21.5M and the gap stays the same.The problem is that even if the gap shrinks (which it won’t), there still will be a gap. Any gap at all is bad news for MSU. We had enough struggles to begin with on the recruiting front without the portal and NIL, just due to Starkville / MS in general / lack of history / stadium and facilities, etc. We have to pay significantly above market as it is.
If what you say comes to fruition, I can see it helping the Auburns and Arkansas types, but it’s not going to do much for us at all.
it starts at the top.And the difference from those years until now are all due to leadership. Poor and ineffective leadership. From who, I do t know but that’s the difference.
We could have hired Kiffin when we hired Moorhead. He had just gone 11-3 in his 1st season at Florida freaking Atlantic & stayed there 2 mir years.We lost both Mullen and Leach the seasons before the best teams they’d ever assembled here took the field. Then we made two disastrous hires to replace both and literally got nothing out of either team. Every bit of the blame for both is on the plastic man that lives by the pond.
Leach’s system was always gonna leave a crater in the program unless we kept running it. We hired the wrong guy and he abandoned it completely. And that’s why we have had 2 shìtty seasons.
As for falling behind the rest of the SEC…. We are terrified of hiring known character risks that we know will win. Look at the pigs and Petrino, Rebs and Kiffin, Auburn and Freeze, etc. There’s no such thing as cheating these days, and absolutely no penalty for hiring an abject piece of shìt to coach. Leach was a knife in a gunfight compared to each of these guys, whether you loved him or not. We need a win-at-all-costs scumbag like the other guys have.
Mullen wouldn’t be getting many recruits at State right now. $$$ = recruitingI’m done arguing about a subject I couldn’t care lesss about. But, even Mullen wouldn’t be vacuuming in recruits at Florida because he hates recruiting, much like Leach did. All the money in the world wouldn’t change that.
Stop with this BS 6.5. We are miles ahead of 6.5. No thanks to you, who has admitted they stopped giving.I think the gap either stays the same or gets bigger after revenue sharing. Texas will just add the $15M to the $22M they're paying now to get to $37M. State will likely only add $8.5M to the $6.5 we're spending now to get to the $15M minimum, and the gap grows. But best case State adds $15M to get to $21.5M and the gap stays the same.
it starts at the top.
You put some respect on that man's name. He's an assistant high school coach.These are the same people that wanted Leach fired during the 9-4 season. They cheered arnett firing Leachs staff. Funny how nfl films has a feature film on Mike leach where he is called a brilliant innovator who changed the game by nfl GMs and head coaches. But you know the Louisville high school coach , obese34 and the rest of the low iq crowd know better.
There's always been a money gap my guy.The problem is that even if the gap shrinks (which it won’t), there still will be a gap. Any gap at all is bad news for MSU. We had enough struggles to begin with on the recruiting front without the portal and NIL, just due to Starkville / MS in general / lack of history / stadium and facilities, etc. We have to pay significantly above market as it is.
If what you say comes to fruition, I can see it helping the Auburns and Arkansas types, but it’s not going to do much for us at all.
I'll give you the 2018 team, but the 2023 team had about 2 more wins tops with Leach.We lost both Mullen and Leach the seasons before the best teams they’d ever assembled here took the field. Then we made two disastrous hires to replace both and literally got nothing out of either team. Every bit of the blame for both is on the plastic man that lives by the pond.
Leach’s system was always gonna leave a crater in the program unless we kept running it. We hired the wrong guy and he abandoned it completely. And that’s why we have had 2 shìtty seasons.
As for falling behind the rest of the SEC…. We are terrified of hiring known character risks that we know will win. Look at the pigs and Petrino, Rebs and Kiffin, Auburn and Freeze, etc. There’s no such thing as cheating these days, and absolutely no penalty for hiring an abject piece of shìt to coach. Leach was a knife in a gunfight compared to each of these guys, whether you loved him or not. We need a win-at-all-costs scumbag like the other guys have.
Freeze is struggling to go 6-6 at AuburnTh
The Programs each respective coach took over was the knife or the gun not the coach. Like it or not we are the poorest school in the sec in the nil era. Leach would be hell on wheels at Auburn. Freeze would struggle to go 6-6 here.
He did not. He will not.I choose football over all other sports at State. Up until this season all my money went to that sport. I just made a decision not to contribute. I will probably buy tickets to a road game and maybe one home game. When you go 2-10 and have one of the worst defenses in the country and make no changes to the defensive coaching staff. That bugs me. Even Mullen had enough sense to get rid of a crappy DC after one season. This defense was worse than Peter Sirmon defense. I hope Hutzler learned from last season and comes out and make me eat crow.
So far he’s 0 for 2 on that. Funny how things change when his recruiting tactics get legalized & levels the playing field.Freeze is struggling to go 6-6 at Auburn
This is what I keep coming back to. We’ve never had the same resources as the big schools. We’ve never recruited in the top 10, 15 or even 20 consistently. This is not new.There's always been a gap. In our best years, there was a gap between us and the top of the SEC. And we managed to win 7-10 games.
Just get Brave Browser, it handles all the ads and I never have to worry about ad blocker problems. Plus it’s probably the best browser anyhow.The adblocker that works on this sight keeps Athlons articles away too.....
![]()
I believe that very same thing drove Saban out of the game. He still got his guys, but a lot of schools were able to get into the game. He lost his on-field advantage. I hope Bama fans understands that. I really hope they don't and go through about 10 different coaches.So far he’s 0 for 2 on that. Funny how things change when his recruiting tactics get legalized & levels the playing field.
I've got OperaJust get Brave Browser, it handles all the ads and I never have to worry about ad blocker problems. Plus it’s probably the best browser anyhow.
For some reason, I doubt PAUWWWWWWLLLLLL has any special knowledge about the commitment level of our football team. If he is asserting that our athletic department does not appear to be exhibiting traits that lead to creating winning programs, I think that may very well be true, and so obvious as to not be newsworthy.
Paul Finebaum talked about our football team not being fully committed and about the apparatus around him not being strong enough.
I hope they go through one coach a year for the next 75 years.I believe that very same thing drove Saban out of the game. He still got his guys, but a lot of schools were able to get into the game. He lost his on-field advantage. I hope Bama fans understands that. I really hope they don't and go through about 10 different coaches.
I don't think it takes any special knowledge to know our commitment level in football is at an all time low.For some reason, I doubt PAUWWWWWWLLLLLL has any special knowledge about the commitment level of our football team. If he is asserting that our athletic department does not appear to be exhibiting traits that lead to creating winning programs, I think that may very well be true, and so obvious as to not be newsworthy.
That's not what's going happen. It's basically base pay plus NIL. KY just privatized their stuff. And the pay ranking stuff won't happen but even if it does, we can't pay the big price tags still, so same thing we see now. Until MSU starts giving a crap about football and marketing etc. revenue won't improve. Those facility improvements are going to be hard to do anytime soon too. We don't even do naming rights yet like a lot of schools.Every school is bringing the collective in house…. SEF/BC will be working on Rev share BI will be recruiting business to help with actual NIL deals. And the clearing house will go through each deal and have stiff penalties from my understanding including fines if they pay above market value . Each deal will have to go through this. No more collectives pay for play