The talk of a pay raise for Jans on T&L got me wondering...
And why is one paid less than the other? IMO Jans should be paid more. He's the most consistent "revenue sport" coach we have.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but Lebby is at 4.5M and Jans is at 4.2M. Doesn't make sense to me. Lebby's team does bring more money to the school, but that's by default. So did Arnett's team. That's a moot point.
Without Jans, our men's teams would be pretty meh. I think Lemo is a good coach, but he's not a huge fan of portal recruiting and NIL. Because of that, we tend to be inconsistent. Football is football. And Jans has shown us his ability to win and recruit. Pay the man. Don't let him slip off to a rival because we are scared to slightly overpay a coach.
I know some people will counter with "he's yet to win the big game". I get that. But I'd rather pay for consistency. Especially in this era of MSU athletics.
And why is one paid less than the other? IMO Jans should be paid more. He's the most consistent "revenue sport" coach we have.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but Lebby is at 4.5M and Jans is at 4.2M. Doesn't make sense to me. Lebby's team does bring more money to the school, but that's by default. So did Arnett's team. That's a moot point.
Without Jans, our men's teams would be pretty meh. I think Lemo is a good coach, but he's not a huge fan of portal recruiting and NIL. Because of that, we tend to be inconsistent. Football is football. And Jans has shown us his ability to win and recruit. Pay the man. Don't let him slip off to a rival because we are scared to slightly overpay a coach.
I know some people will counter with "he's yet to win the big game". I get that. But I'd rather pay for consistency. Especially in this era of MSU athletics.