Thought this was interesting. Unusual suspects doing well in an era we all mostly cry about being unfair. Without looking at their rosters, my guess is these teams have veteran rosters with little turnover.
Anyone aware of any stats or data that exists that evaluate that by program? We may be quickly entering an era where experience and team rapport are more valuable than the talent you can access by throwing money at it. Talent is great, but only if it all pulls in the same direction. Much harder to do that with a high roster turnover EVERY year.
Or maybe they all just have easy schedules.
Anyone aware of any stats or data that exists that evaluate that by program? We may be quickly entering an era where experience and team rapport are more valuable than the talent you can access by throwing money at it. Talent is great, but only if it all pulls in the same direction. Much harder to do that with a high roster turnover EVERY year.
Or maybe they all just have easy schedules.