Reflections on Penguins & Flyers

Alphalion75

Well-known member
Oct 21, 2021
2,832
2,987
113
When I attended Penn State back in the 70's, the Flyers were at the pinnacle of their back to back Stanley Cups. The Penguins were languishing in the cellar of the NHL. Back then, who would have fathomed that the Penguins would become a 5 time Stanley Cup Champion and the dominant team in Pennsylvania. While the Flyers have not won a cup since those two in the 70's. Not me.
 
Last edited:

PSU Chicago

Well-known member
Oct 9, 2021
447
756
93
Flyers have lost their way. No team identity. Always a step behind in practically everything from an organizational to player types to scouting to type of play ..... The fans have been more than loyal to that team.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mrmk5110

manatree

Well-known member
Oct 6, 2021
1,799
2,921
113
It was the obnoxious Flyers fans that I grew up with that caused me to pull for the Penguins out of spite. Never been more than a casual fan.
 

pap

Well-known member
Nov 1, 2021
6,976
4,653
113
When I attended Penn State back in the 70's, the Flyers were at the pinnacle of their back to back Stanley Cups. The Penguins were languishing in the cellar of the NHL. Back then, who would have fathomed that the Penguins would become a 5 time Stanley Cup Champion and the dominant team in Pennsylvania. While the Flyers have not won a cup since those two in the 70's. Not me.
How times have changed
 

Alphalion75

Well-known member
Oct 21, 2021
2,832
2,987
113
It was the obnoxious Flyers fans that I grew up with that caused me to pull for the Penguins out of spite. Never been more than a casual fan.
I'm not a casual fan, but same with me regarding the Flyers fans. On my dorm floor there were a bunch of Flyer fans who had no regard for anyone else. They would monopolize the study room to play street hockey. And no one could say anything to them. That was the year the Steelers won their first Super Bowl. I got a little payback on that day. 😀
 
  • Like
Reactions: ODShowtime

manatree

Well-known member
Oct 6, 2021
1,799
2,921
113
I'm not a casual fan, but same with me regarding the Flyers fans. On my dorm floor there were a bunch of Flyer fans who had no regard for anyone else. They would monopolize the study room to play street hockey. And no one could say anything to them. That was the year the Steelers won their first Super Bowl. I got a little payback on that day. 😀

While I grew up in what is considered to be Philly territory, the radio station my family listened to carried the Steelers as well as the Phillies, so I don’t ever remember NOT rooting for the Phils or Stillers. There was and still is a big Steeler following in the area, but the Eagles are by far the more popular team. Was also a big Sixers growing up, but haven’t followed the NBA in 25 years.
 

kgilbert78

Well-known member
Oct 25, 2021
620
1,007
93
I'm not a casual fan, but same with me regarding the Flyers fans. On my dorm floor there were a bunch of Flyer fans who had no regard for anyone else. They would monopolize the study room to play street hockey. And no one could say anything to them. That was the year the Steelers won their first Super Bowl. I got a little payback on that day. 😀
Steeler fans were just as bad in my day at State. We had to watch the last seconds of a 55-0 win in our TV room in our dorm while the Eagles were playing a close game vs Dallas.
 

mrmk5110

Well-known member
Oct 12, 2021
451
1,070
93
Flyers have lost their way. No team identity. Always a step behind in practically everything from an organizational to player types to scouting to type of play ..... The fans have been more than loyal to that team.
As a long time Flyers fan, it's just sad to see what has become of the franchise.

The team and identity that I grew up around faded when Snider passed. Now they are just another ho-hum, mediocre professional sports organization that is as bland as their play on the ice.

Until Comcast sells the team to a group that actually knows how to run a hockey team, it will never change and they will never win.
 

Alphalion75

Well-known member
Oct 21, 2021
2,832
2,987
113
Steeler fans were just as bad in my day at State. We had to watch the last seconds of a 55-0 win in our TV room in our dorm while the Eagles were playing a close game vs Dallas.
Well...let me ask. Were the Steeler fans a majority in the TV room? Majority rules my friend. In my case, these guys were NOT the majority.
 

Bvillebaron

Well-known member
Oct 12, 2021
1,595
1,726
113
Well...I guess fans are the same all over. Though most don't throw snowballs at Santa Claus.
You couldn’t pay me to go to an Eagles game. Too many fans think it’s a license to engage in thug activity. Name me one other professional franchise who had a district judge stationed at the stadium to process criminal charges after the game.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Liontown

TheGlovStillRules

Well-known member
Oct 14, 2021
1,137
866
113
When I attended Penn State back in the 70's, the Flyers were at the pinnacle of their back to back Stanley Cups. The Penguins were languishing in the cellar of the NHL. Back then, who would have fathomed that the Penguins would become a 5 time Stanley Cup Champion and the dominant team in Pennsylvania. While the Flyers have not won a cup since those two in the 70's. Not me.

Somewhere Tom is feeling pain!

Probably lying on the beach in pain.
 

TheGlovStillRules

Well-known member
Oct 14, 2021
1,137
866
113
Excuse Me Hockey GIF


Dumbest & stupidest mascot in sports!

Steely McBeam included.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LB99

LB99

Well-known member
Oct 27, 2021
6,214
8,164
113
Getting draft lucky helped. Pens got two overall no. 1's and two overall #2's in 4 years. And they didn't screw it up.
I don’t know if you would call that “draft lucky”. They were pretty bad leading up to those drafts to “earn” those picks. Plus, the franchise was in complete disarray from an ownership perspective and there rumors of a sale and possibly moving the franchise. That’s how Lemieux ended up owning the franchise.
 

LB99

Well-known member
Oct 27, 2021
6,214
8,164
113
As a long time Flyers fan, it's just sad to see what has become of the franchise.

The team and identity that I grew up around faded when Snider passed. Now they are just another ho-hum, mediocre professional sports organization that is as bland as their play on the ice.

Until Comcast sells the team to a group that actually knows how to run a hockey team, it will never change and they will never win.
Full disclose before I say this and I am not arguing with you or attacking you, just giving you my perspective. I’m a Pens fan who has a lot of friends who are Flyers fans.

I always felt Snider held the franchise back. Under his leadership, they always signed a “big name” player who was way past their prime. They would give that player good money and market them to put butts in the seats, but it never resulted in a Cup. It almost seemed like Snider was content with that. Also, because of that, they were a ho-hum, mediocre sports organization prior to Snider’s passing. Again, not saying it to pick a fight, just my 2 cents from an outsider’s perspective. Some of my Flyers friends agree with me, some don’t, up to you.

Lastly, as an example of how they could have sculpted their roster differently. IMO, they should have traded Giroux a few years ago after his career season. They could have gotten the max amount for him and possibly paired some talented younger players with the Flyers good, young core players like Hart. Giroux was never going to have another season like that one. As it is, they kept him too long, it didn’t work out, and Hart looks like a completely different player. Again, just perspective from the outside looking in.
 

kgilbert78

Well-known member
Oct 25, 2021
620
1,007
93
I don’t know if you would call that “draft lucky”. They were pretty bad leading up to those drafts to “earn” those picks. Plus, the franchise was in complete disarray from an ownership perspective and there rumors of a sale and possibly moving the franchise. That’s how Lemieux ended up owning the franchise.
Given that the position was determined by lottery? Lucky. Given that the they got to draft well two years running from only one bad season, due to the missed season (lockout)? Still a bit lucky. The Blue jackets have had more bad seasons, overall, than the Pens. In all their seasons they've only drafted the no. 1 pick once--and that due to a trade. Other than that? One No. 2, two No. 3's (one of which was involved in the Nash trade). That's it. That Pens team was born on third base and the fans think they hit a triple.
 

91Joe95

Well-known member
Oct 6, 2021
2,843
4,067
113
The Penguins only have two players on the roster that they drafted in the first round - Malkin and Crosby from 16+ years ago. Both have missed large portions of seasons over the years, including this year. They have made lots of good picks past the first round over the years, and have made some very shrewd trades. The Penguins without Crosby and Malkin are still a deep and talented team that would fit in well with a lot of other team's top players, and anyone in the league had or could have had everyone of their players on the roster.
 

LB99

Well-known member
Oct 27, 2021
6,214
8,164
113
Given that the position was determined by lottery? Lucky. Given that the they got to draft well two years running from only one bad season, due to the missed season (lockout)? Still a bit lucky. The Blue jackets have had more bad seasons, overall, than the Pens. In all their seasons they've only drafted the no. 1 pick once--and that due to a trade. Other than that? One No. 2, two No. 3's (one of which was involved in the Nash trade). That's it. That Pens team was born on third base and the fans think they hit a triple.
Spoken like a true bitter Flyers fan.
 

LB99

Well-known member
Oct 27, 2021
6,214
8,164
113
Given that the position was determined by lottery? Lucky. Given that the they got to draft well two years running from only one bad season, due to the missed season (lockout)? Still a bit lucky. The Blue jackets have had more bad seasons, overall, than the Pens. In all their seasons they've only drafted the no. 1 pick once--and that due to a trade. Other than that? One No. 2, two No. 3's (one of which was involved in the Nash trade). That's it. That Pens team was born on third base and the fans think they hit a triple.



The 01-02 Pens only had 28 wins, 69 points and finished 5th in the Atlantic, missing the playoffs.

02-03 27 wins, 65 points, 5th, no playoffs
03-04 23 wins, 58 points, 5th, no playoffs
05-06 22 wins, 58 points, 5th, no playoffs.

So, did they get a favorable lottery, sure. Did they get draft lucky from “only one bad season” as you assert? Not exactly. They were pretty bad for a few years there. As you said, they nailed the high draft picks also. They hit it out of the park. The GM and front office in those drafts were spot on and the Pens have reaped the benefits ever since. Subsequent GMs since then have made very good trades along the way that have kept the team on track.
 

kgilbert78

Well-known member
Oct 25, 2021
620
1,007
93


The 01-02 Pens only had 28 wins, 69 points and finished 5th in the Atlantic, missing the playoffs.

02-03 27 wins, 65 points, 5th, no playoffs
03-04 23 wins, 58 points, 5th, no playoffs
05-06 22 wins, 58 points, 5th, no playoffs.

So, did they get a favorable lottery, sure. Did they get draft lucky from “only one bad season” as you assert? Not exactly. They were pretty bad for a few years there. As you said, they nailed the high draft picks also. They hit it out of the park. The GM and front office in those drafts were spot on and the Pens have reaped the benefits ever since. Subsequent GMs since then have made very good trades along the way that have kept the team on track.
It's easy to hit it out of the park if you draft that high. As I noted, the Jackets, by lottery, have only ever had one #2 pick. In 20+ seasons. Zero #1's by the lottery. The Pens had three #1 or #2 in four years (and a fourth by trade).

Jackets in that same time span?
57 points in 01-02, followed by 62, 69, and 74. They didn't make the playoffs until 08-09. Draft picks by the lottery during that period? #3, #4, #4, #6, #8. That's a bit different.
 

LB99

Well-known member
Oct 27, 2021
6,214
8,164
113
It's easy to hit it out of the park if you draft that high. As I noted, the Jackets, by lottery, have only ever had one #2 pick. In 20+ seasons. Zero #1's by the lottery. The Pens had three #1 or #2 in four years (and a fourth by trade).

Jackets in that same time span?
57 points in 01-02, followed by 62, 69, and 74. They didn't make the playoffs until 08-09. Draft picks by the lottery during that period? #3, #4, #4, #6, #8. That's a bit different.
Then why don’t the Jackets make a trade to move up too? What’s stopping them?
 

kgilbert78

Well-known member
Oct 25, 2021
620
1,007
93
Then why don’t the Jackets make a trade to move up too? What’s stopping them?
Making a trade has nothing to do with lottery luck. And that's what we have been talking about. Give me any team, other than the Pens, who had the same lottery luck over 4 years. You'll be waiting quite some time.

And, of couse, as noted earlier, the Jackets did move up--once--via trade to get Nash.
 

Karl_Havok

Well-known member
Oct 6, 2021
3,153
6,391
113
Making a trade has nothing to do with lottery luck. And that's what we have been talking about. Give me any team, other than the Pens, who had the same lottery luck over 4 years. You'll be waiting quite some time.

And, of couse, as noted earlier, the Jackets did move up--once--via trade to get Nash.

Is your whole point that the Pens were lucky in regards to the draft? If so, so what?
 
  • Like
Reactions: LB99

LB99

Well-known member
Oct 27, 2021
6,214
8,164
113
Making a trade has nothing to do with lottery luck. And that's what we have been talking about. Give me any team, other than the Pens, who had the same lottery luck over 4 years. You'll be waiting quite some time.

And, of couse, as noted earlier, the Jackets did move up--once--via trade to get Nash.
Weren’t you the one saying the Pens benefitted from a trade to get another top end pick?
I’m confused. You keep moving the goalposts here. You insinuated that the Pens somehow got high draft picks with only one bad season, which wasn’t accurate. They had multiple bad seasons, finishing last in their division and the rumors were they were going to be sold and possibly moved. That isn’t being “lucky”. Seems to me that they did a great job with scouting and identifying players they thought would turn things around.
 

kgilbert78

Well-known member
Oct 25, 2021
620
1,007
93
Weren’t you the one saying the Pens benefitted from a trade to get another top end pick?
I’m confused. You keep moving the goalposts here. You insinuated that the Pens somehow got high draft picks with only one bad season, which wasn’t accurate. They had multiple bad seasons, finishing last in their division and the rumors were they were going to be sold and possibly moved. That isn’t being “lucky”. Seems to me that they did a great job with scouting and identifying players they thought would turn things around.
My point was, if you go back to the top of the thread, that one (not the only reason) for the Pens success was getting lucky in the draft-specifically the draft lottery. I haven't moved that bar at all. It's a heck of a lot easier to pick good players when you are picking first or second overall four years running. Sure the Pens had bad seasons. But that's not luck--good or bad, The Jackets have had equally as horrid seasons--over a much longer period of time--but no lottery pick luck.
 
Get unlimited access today.

Pick the right plan for you.

Already a member? Login