I can understand this decision. And referring back to SC, didn't seem to hurt them much, not a bad idea to have the two universities situated like that. Of course, up there it happened backwards, USC is much older and went to the capital, and Clemson came along later (funny enough, built in the image of MSU).
Hard to be that visionary. And the people of Mississippi were so divided back then, would have been difficult to do, that's why the split was happening in the first place. MSU nearly went to Meridian, so not only did they pass on Jackson, they also passed on another decent town (at the time) that was logistically better. They wanted that black prairie soil I guess and wanted to get away from riff raff in Meridian. Baptist Culture strikes again. That's why I say Jackson may not have been the play, but why not somewhere in the middle of there and Vicksburg or slightly north? Right by the ag mecca of the Delta, east LA and SE AR.
And with Vicksburg reeling from the Civil War, could have helped Reconstruction. Crazy.