SEC transfer rule

pseudonym

Well-known member
Oct 6, 2022
3,500
4,978
113

I think this is a really good rule for the SEC. I've always said eliminating immediate eligibility is the single best thing that could be done to fix college sports.

I've been told that can never be walked back because of lawsuits, court decisions, etc.

How can the SEC get away with it? I'm sure there is an answer, but if the SEC can do it, why can't the NCAA do it?
 

Called3rdstrikedawg

Well-known member
May 7, 2016
1,150
1,065
113

I think this is a really good rule for the SEC. I've always said eliminating immediate eligibility is the single best thing that could be done to fix college sports.

I've been told that can never be walked back because of lawsuits, court decisions, etc.

How can the SEC get away with it? I'm sure there is an answer, but if the SEC can do it, why can't the NCAA do it?
The NCAA can do it! They just don't want to fight the battles any more because they are battered and Bruised from all their losses!
 

pseudonym

Well-known member
Oct 6, 2022
3,500
4,978
113
The NCAA can do it! They just don't want to fight the battles any more because they are battered and Bruised from all their losses!
This is my feeling. That is why I think we should loudly demand this of the leaders of college sports (ADs, university presidents, etc.).
 

pseudonym

Well-known member
Oct 6, 2022
3,500
4,978
113
The SEC rule only applies to spring transfer window. The conference should expand it to both windows. It would bring sanity to the portal within the conference and show the whole country that it can be done.
 

patdog

Well-known member
May 28, 2007
51,168
16,889
113
The SEC rule only applies to spring transfer window. The conference should expand it to both windows. It would bring sanity to the portal within the conference and show the whole country that it can be done.
That would be a bad move for the conference. You're limiting your pool of potential incoming transfers while doing nothing to stop the flow of outgoing transfers. Big 10 would love that SEC rule.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dawgg

pseudonym

Well-known member
Oct 6, 2022
3,500
4,978
113
That would be a bad move for the conference. You're limiting your pool of potential incoming transfers while doing nothing to stop the flow of outgoing transfers. Big 10 would love that SEC rule.
The rule only applies to SEC-to-SEC transfers. For example, Nico can't transfer from Tennessee to another SEC school (without sitting out), but Tennessee can replace him with a transfer from a Big Ten school who plays immediately.
 

Perd Hapley

Well-known member
Sep 30, 2022
4,208
4,676
113
The rule only applies to SEC-to-SEC transfers. For example, Nico can't transfer from Tennessee to another SEC school (without sitting out), but Tennessee can replace him with a transfer from a Big Ten school who plays immediately.
Which means that some other non-SEC school is upgrading, while Tennessee is downgrading.

The SEC still has the best talent, bar none. Nico was a Top 2-3 QB in the best league in the country. Him exiting the SEC in exchange for some bloke from the ACC, Big 12, or B1G (if Tennessee can even pull someone of that caliber) is not what is best for the SEC.
 

pseudonym

Well-known member
Oct 6, 2022
3,500
4,978
113
Which means that some other non-SEC school is upgrading, while Tennessee is downgrading.

The SEC still has the best talent, bar none. Nico was a Top 2-3 QB in the best league in the country. Him exiting the SEC in exchange for some bloke from the ACC, Big 12, or B1G (if Tennessee can even pull someone of that caliber) is not what is best for the SEC.
You're not seeing what it is preventing.

This Nico situation would be a lot more common if the SEC allowed it within the conference.
 

patdog

Well-known member
May 28, 2007
51,168
16,889
113
The rule only applies to SEC-to-SEC transfers. For example, Nico can't transfer from Tennessee to another SEC school (without sitting out), but Tennessee can replace him with a transfer from a Big Ten school who plays immediately.
I understand that. But you're limiting every SEC school on the pool of players they can bring in. A Big 10 school can pull from ALL transfers, SEC, Big 10 or other. But SEC schools can only pull from Big 10 or other. That's a disadvantage for the SEC.
 

patdog

Well-known member
May 28, 2007
51,168
16,889
113
You're not seeing what it is preventing.

This Nico situation would be a lot more common if the SEC allowed it within the conference.
It's obviously not preventing anything. All it's doing it taking a quality player out of the SEC, likely to the Big 10. Assuming this guy is really as good as he's hyped up to be, which I think is questionable.
 

patdog

Well-known member
May 28, 2007
51,168
16,889
113
Which means that some other non-SEC school is upgrading, while Tennessee is downgrading.

The SEC still has the best talent, bar none. Nico was a Top 2-3 QB in the best league in the country. Him exiting the SEC in exchange for some bloke from the ACC, Big 12, or B1G (if Tennessee can even pull someone of that caliber) is not what is best for the SEC.
Exactly.
 

ETK99

Well-known member
Jul 30, 2019
6,631
8,892
112
Meh, he's always chasing money and making demands, sometimes it's addition by subtraction. These guys usually go off the rails.
Which means that some other non-SEC school is upgrading, while Tennessee is downgrading.

The SEC still has the best talent, bar none. Nico was a Top 2-3 QB in the best league in the country. Him exiting the SEC in exchange for some bloke from the ACC, Big 12, or B1G (if Tennessee can even pull someone of that caliber) is not what is best for the SEC.
 

TheBannerM

Active member
Nov 30, 2024
345
386
63
I understand that. But you're limiting every SEC school on the pool of players they can bring in. A Big 10 school can pull from ALL transfers, SEC, Big 10 or other. But SEC schools can only pull from Big 10 or other. That's a disadvantage for the SEC.
I only care about what's best for Mississippi State. Not having SEC teams poaching our best players after the Spring is a good thing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: patdog

PBRME

Well-known member
Feb 12, 2004
10,174
3,140
113
I only care about what's best for Mississippi State. Not having SEC teams poaching our best players after the Spring is a good thing.
Exactly. That rule is in place to protect schools like us from having what little talent we have from being picked clean by the haves due to injuries or glaring holes in their lineup.
 

patdog

Well-known member
May 28, 2007
51,168
16,889
113
I only care about what's best for Mississippi State. Not having SEC teams poaching our best players after the Spring is a good thing.
I can kind of agree with that. And not sure the current rule which allows winter transfers within the conference is really putting the SEC at a huge disadvantage, since most schools want to get their team lined up in time for spring practice. But a rule completely eliminating in-conference transfers would definitely put the SEC at a big disadvantage, although it might be good for Mississippi State. I do know one thing. If I'm a Big 10 school, I'm probably staying away from this I'm-a-Leava guy anyway unless I'm just desperate for a QB. What are you going to do if he gets you to the playoffs and decides to hold out for $10M this time?