What yardage are you typically playing at golf courses from senior tees?
Groups I play in have various opinions.
Again, need input from 65+ crowd.
Groups I play in have various opinions.
Again, need input from 65+ crowd.
You'd have a pretty good arguement if you make the qualification for senior tees whatever age it is to get a senior discount at course you're at... assuming they have one at least one day in the week. Makes it a little less subjective.What yardage are you typically playing at golf courses from senior tees?
Groups I play in have various opinions.
Again, need input from 65+ crowd.
I see that some courses aren't doing women, mens, senior tees. You use tee's based on your average score regardless of age / gender. Makes sense to me.You'd have a pretty good arguement if you make the qualification for senior tees whatever age it is to get a senior discount at course you're at... assuming they have one at least one day in the week. Makes it a little less subjective.
That's a new one on me. Yeah, makes sense.I see that some courses aren't doing women, mens, senior tees. You use tee's based on your average score regardless of age / gender. Makes sense to me.
It really does depend on the course imo.Born in '56, I play most comfortably 5400 - 5750 yardages. At some courses, it may be the reds, but usually this is the gold tees. Second shot yardages (par4) under or around 160 is best. And I play a four course rotation.
and this is a group.
Yes, our course has a tee for over 65 and over 70 plays red tees.I see that some courses aren't doing women, mens, senior tees. You use tee's based on your average score regardless of age / gender. Makes sense to me.
yes this. When watching golf on tv, yardages given for second shots are much of the time short irons and this is why I play. Second shots are the glory of the game. No need to have a second shot that has no hope of hitting a green, it's just not FUN.It’s really no fun when second shots are consistently 175-200 (or more) all day long. I’m old enough that I can’t hit it very long off the tee, but too young to look like I should be on the senior tees. But I’m definitely old enough that I don’t care what people think
If I pay to play I want to feel like my approach shots are fun. So I pick between White or Gold tees depending on the course.
Yes, this is a growing trend and I think it makes sense. A USGA handicap is an apples-to-apples comparison between golfers and takes into the account the tees played from in a given round. I see more and more courses applying suggested handicap ranges to each sets of tees. This makes it less likely that mid-handicappers try to play from the tips or that scratch golfers who happen to be AARP members insist on teeing off from the "senior" tees. Both are equally annoying, depending one whether you are in front of them or behind them.I see that some courses aren't doing women, mens, senior tees. You use tee's based on your average score regardless of age / gender. Makes sense to me.
I don't really agree with this though. I have a buddy whose best score is an 83, but typically shoots 95-105. He can drive it 300 and we live on flat, soft land on the coast, so say columbia courses, he's gonna hit some balls 350+. Now it doesn't always go straight, but if he were to move up to the 95-105 tees, which from what I have seen is 5500 yards or so, he could hit a 4 iron off every tee and then 3 putt from the fringe for par. His screw ups, are largely in part of the distance needed from the tee, and then what proceeds thereafter.I see that some courses aren't doing women, mens, senior tees. You use tee's based on your average score regardless of age / gender. Makes sense to me.
I've also read to figure your 5 iron or equivalent club average distance and multiply by 36 to get your yardage to play.I don't really agree with this though. I have a buddy whose best score is an 83, but typically shoots 95-105. He can drive it 300 and we live on flat, soft land on the coast, so say columbia courses, he's gonna hit some balls 350+. Now it doesn't always go straight, but if he were to move up to the 95-105 tees, which from what I have seen is 5500 yards or so, he could hit a 4 iron off every tee and then 3 putt from the fringe for par. His screw ups, are largely in part of the distance needed from the tee, and then what proceeds thereafter.
Generally, for anyone playing on a consistent 2-3x/month basis that shoots 100 or below, they aren't not scoring well because of distance. It's because of an errant drive or 2 that lead to bad mistakes and big scores and then bladed chips, really bad putts, 3 swings from the sand, etc.
This reminds me of a slightly different topic, but related to how far you can hit it. Had a friend at MUSC that was a natural athlete that never played golf. But all us dental school guys loved to play so he started going out with us. This guy was so frustrated, always shooting 120+. And I’m a tiny guy who at the time was a pretty good golfer (upper 70s, low 80s). Next time we went out, I asked him what his best long to medium club was, and he answered 5 iron. I said, trust me….and when we got to the course, I took his 3 iron, 4 iron and woods and put them in the trunk. And he was right. He could crack 5 iron down the middle every time. Guy shot an 88 and got hooked on golf that day.I've also read to figure your 5 iron or equivalent club average distance and multiply by 36 to get your yardage to play.
All replies to this thread have been good for considering.
Dang. My dad is your age as well and he's still slamming it 200+ yards on a drive.Born in '56, I play most comfortably 5400 - 5750 yardages. At some courses, it may be the reds, but usually this is the gold tees. Second shot yardages (par4) under or around 160 is best. And I play a four course rotation.
and this is a group.
The guys I usually play with, around here (St. Simons area) we usually play 5,900-6,300 or so. When we play 6,000 or below, I use my driver maybe 5 holes (par 5s and maybe an open or long par 4). Those rounds I tend to shoot high 70s pretty consistently. My PR is 74, but that was a day and others close are days the driver is clicking and I’m hitting greens.This reminds me of a slightly different topic, but related to how far you can hit it. Had a friend at MUSC that was a natural athlete that never played golf. But all us dental school guys loved to play so he started going out with us. This guy was so frustrated, always shooting 120+. And I’m a tiny guy who at the time was a pretty good golfer (upper 70s, low 80s). Next time we went out, I asked him what his best long to medium club was, and he answered 5 iron. I said, trust me….and when we got to the course, I took his 3 iron, 4 iron and woods and put them in the trunk. And he was right. He could crack 5 iron down the middle every time. Guy shot an 88 and got hooked on golf that day.
Of course….Next trip he teed up the driver and shot 105. Took him a while, but as a natural athlete, he was ready to beat me occasionally by the time we graduated.
If you go by my last 2 rounds, I would have to play the closest tees possible.lol.a good 8-10 strokes higher than normal.I shot a 91,90..I haven’t shot 90+ in over 3 years and that was just once.I mainly shot around 80.I’ve seen a course go by your average drive to determine what tees you should be playing.Which I think is a better idea.I see that some courses aren't doing women, mens, senior tees. You use tee's based on your average score regardless of age / gender. Makes sense to me.
I 100% agree with that last paragraph. I’m forced to play from the senior tees with the guys i play with on Tuesday/Thursday. I can drive every par 5 in 2 and every par 4 I can get within 100 yards pretty easily.I the partial shots and chipping usually does me in.If I do those 2 things we’ll,I can shoot mid 70s..I don't really agree with this though. I have a buddy whose best score is an 83, but typically shoots 95-105. He can drive it 300 and we live on flat, soft land on the coast, so say columbia courses, he's gonna hit some balls 350+. Now it doesn't always go straight, but if he were to move up to the 95-105 tees, which from what I have seen is 5500 yards or so, he could hit a 4 iron off every tee and then 3 putt from the fringe for par. His screw ups, are largely in part of the distance needed from the tee, and then what proceeds thereafter.
Generally, for anyone playing on a consistent 2-3x/month basis that shoots 100 or below, they aren't not scoring well because of distance. It's because of an errant drive or 2 that lead to bad mistakes and big scores and then bladed chips, really bad putts, 3 swings from the sand, etc.
The guys I usually play with, around here (St. Simons area) we usually play 5,900-6,300 or so. When we play 6,000 or below, I use my driver maybe 5 holes (par 5s and maybe an open or long par 4). Those rounds I tend to shoot high 70s pretty consistently. My PR is 74, but that was a day and others close are days the driver is clicking and I’m hitting greens.
never heard the 5 iron multiply rule but man I would suckkkk lol. I hit my 5 iron roughly 200 yards. Prob average more like 190 due some shots floating right and losing average, but a good clean 5 is 200. At 7200 I would shoot 90+ every round lol. I think longest I’ve played is 6800, and I played pretty well and shot an 85.
Pretty strong for a 5 iron IMO. I couldn't break 90 at 6800 yards. I currently play from 5700+, going to 5300+ senior tees. I'll be 66 next month, time for this move.The guys I usually play with, around here (St. Simons area) we usually play 5,900-6,300 or so. When we play 6,000 or below, I use my driver maybe 5 holes (par 5s and maybe an open or long par 4). Those rounds I tend to shoot high 70s pretty consistently. My PR is 74, but that was a day and others close are days the driver is clicking and I’m hitting greens.
never heard the 5 iron multiply rule but man I would suckkkk lol. I hit my 5 iron roughly 200 yards. Prob average more like 190 due some shots floating right and losing average, but a good clean 5 is 200. At 7200 I would shoot 90+ every round lol. I think longest I’ve played is 6800, and I played pretty well and shot an 85.
I've played courses where tee markers mix on certain holes on the scorecard. Basically a combination senior tee/regular tee. This fixes the distance assignment you mention. I wish my home course did this.I play our gold tees, which are the recognized senior tees in Lancaster. The are something over 5400 yards. The problem is the assignment of distance to specific holes. We have a couple of holes that are just too short. On the other hand, we have a par four that plays as long as our longest par five. Something ain't right with that.
We need to put most seniors on the competition senior tees on certain holes, an intermediate set we have that are slightly longer. We need to move the tees forward on that back-breaking par four I mentioned.I've played courses where tee markers mix on certain holes on the scorecard. Basically a combination senior tee/regular tee. This fixes the distance assignment you mention. I wish my home course did this.
I’m definitely long, longer than most people I play with, even players who a are better than me.Pretty strong for a 5 iron IMO. I couldn't break 90 at 6800 yards. I currently play from 5700+, going to 5300+ senior tees. I'll be 66 next month, time for this move.
Oak Hills basic layout is fairly tough for seniors from the member tees, but I play for the challange so I keep playing them! The slope and rating confirm that! None of the par fives are easily reachable in 2 and the green complexes warrant you to bring your short game if you don’t it’s easily a 10 stroke swing in your score, but it is a bombers course for the most part and wide open and thats what i love about it! I should shoot low 80’s out there but my short game on and around those greens usually make it low to mid 90’s!Most of my shots lost are less than a hundred yards & typically on or around the green. At oak hills it’s pretty valuable 5,6 strokes over the white tees. At Linrick it seems to matter less.
I’m on the senior tees about 10% of the time with my uncle and some of our buddies. Once money or a bet comes up, I seem to get sent to the standard tees with out discussion
I'm not suggesting it's right or wrong. I believe pace of play is the motivation. You have these young bloods that can hit the ball 300+ but shoot 100+ because they spend a good bit of their day in the woods. They shouldn't be playing from the back tees as many do. Slows everyone down.I don't really agree with this though. I have a buddy whose best score is an 83, but typically shoots 95-105. He can drive it 300 and we live on flat, soft land on the coast, so say columbia courses, he's gonna hit some balls 350+. Now it doesn't always go straight, but if he were to move up to the 95-105 tees, which from what I have seen is 5500 yards or so, he could hit a 4 iron off every tee and then 3 putt from the fringe for par. His screw ups, are largely in part of the distance needed from the tee, and then what proceeds thereafter.
Generally, for anyone playing on a consistent 2-3x/month basis that shoots 100 or below, they aren't not scoring well because of distance. It's because of an errant drive or 2 that lead to bad mistakes and big scores and then bladed chips, really bad putts, 3 swings from the sand, etc.
100%. And funny thing is its 3 or 4 holes thst pushes me over 90 ( even from the senior tees on the occasion). Front the standard Tees, I’m usually between 80. & 120 on my third.Oak Hills basic layout is fairly tough for seniors from the member tees, but I play for the challange so I keep playing them! The slope and rating confirm that! None of the par fives are easily reachable in 2 and the green complexes warrant you to bring your short game if you don’t it’s easily a 10 stroke swing in your score, but it is a bombers course for the most part and wide open and thats what i love about it! I should shoot low 80’s out there but my short game on and around those greens usually make it low to mid 90’s!
12 might be the toughest green on the course, only place to miss it is short, then 13 looks so easy right there in front of you, but don’t miss the green or you’re looking at 5 and if you hit the green you better be on the right tier or your staring at 4! Just a lot of little tests around the green out there, but it’s my go to!100%. And funny thing is its 3 or 4 holes thst pushes me over 90 ( even from the senior tees on the occasion). Front the standard Tees, I’m usually between 80. & 120 on my third.
you can wreck a score on 8,9,10 very easily, but play it 2 over, or steal the occasional birdie on 9& you can sail through that patch with sub 90/85 in play.
12&18 are totally scoring holes and have to be par or close on the card
I would be shooting in the 70's if you remove 3-4 holes.100%. And funny thing is its 3 or 4 holes thst pushes me over 90 ( even from the senior tees on the occasion). Front the standard Tees, I’m usually between 80. & 120 on my third.
you can wreck a score on 8,9,10 very easily, but play it 2 over, or steal the occasional birdie on 9& you can sail through that patch with sub 90/85 in play.
12&18 are totally scoring holes and have to be par or close on the card
Just stop at 14I would be shooting in the 70's if you remove 3-4 holes.
Yep! Exactly what it would take to get me in the 70's.Just stop at 14
I used to enjoy OaK Hills in years gone by, the Lung Book years where we took day trips all over the Midlands. Good times. Oak Hills in the 1990s was a fun layout in good shape. I also remember how rocky the property was.Oak Hills basic layout is fairly tough for seniors from the member tees, but I play for the challange so I keep playing them! The slope and rating confirm that! None of the par fives are easily reachable in 2 and the green complexes warrant you to bring your short game if you don’t it’s easily a 10 stroke swing in your score, but it is a bombers course for the most part and wide open and thats what i love about it! I should shoot low 80’s out there but my short game on and around those greens usually make it low to mid 90’s!
Right. It's not simply a matter of distance. On many courses, the back tees often require different and more difficult angles, longer carries over water, narrow tree-line "chutes" to drive through and other factors that increase the difficulty and decrease the margin for error. You don't simply need to be longer, you need to better. In my experience, it's less about how far you hit your good shots but how often you hit bad shots. On most courses, the further back the tee box, the more punishment you can expect for bad shots. When in doubt, compare the rating and slope for two given sets of tees and play within your abilities, regardless the color of the tee.I'm not suggesting it's right or wrong. I believe pase of play is the motivation. You have these young bloods that can hit the ball 300+ but shoot 100+ because they spend a good bit of their day in the woods. They shouldn't be playing from the back tees as many do. Slows everyone down.
It’s still rocky in spots King, you just have to careful in places, but for columbia it’s the best golf value in town, seniors on weekdays is around 30 with range balls!I used to enjoy OaK Hills in years gone by, the Lung Book years where we took day trips all over the Midlands. Good times. Oak Hills in the 1990s was a fun layout in good shape. I also remember how rocky the property was.
There are also clubs that will limit playing from the tips to those that can produce evidence of a current single digit handicap. However I am not aware of any clubs or courses in this area that have the requirement.Right. It's not simply a matter of distance. On many courses, the back tees often require different and more difficult angles, longer carries over water, narrow tree-line "chutes" to drive through and other factors that increase the difficulty and decrease the margin for error. You don't simply need to be longer, you need to better. In my experience, it's less about how far you hit your good shots but how often you hit bad shots. On most courses, the further back the tee box, the more punishment you can expect for bad shots. When in doubt, compare the rating and slope for two given sets of tees and play within your abilities, regardless the color of the tee.
I like what a senior golfer told me on playing senior tees, you still have to chip and putt good to score. Length of tees ain't everythingRight. It's not simply a matter of distance. On many courses, the back tees often require different and more difficult angles, longer carries over water, narrow tree-line "chutes" to drive through and other factors that increase the difficulty and decrease the margin for error. You don't simply need to be longer, you need to better. In my experience, it's lessabout how far you hit your good shots but how often you hit bad shots. On most courses, the further back the tee box, the more punishment you can expect for bad shots. When in doubt, compare the rating and slope for two given sets of tees and play within your abilities, regardless the color of the tee.
I like what a senior golfer told me on playing senior tees, you still have to chip and putt good to score. Length of tees ain't everything![]()