So is the SEC poor or just more poor than their new rich af blue blood members?

[BakerMayfieldsMustache]

Article breaking down how much more money the SEC brought in adding Oklahoma and texas than the Big10 did bringing in Ucla and Usc.

Which are the richest and poorest SEC football programs? (And where do Texas and Oklahoma fit in?) | Jones

On Thursday, we showed you Big Ten football revenue figures from the U.S. Department of Education's annual Equity in Athletics data dump. Now it's time for the Southeastern Conference. And you will see how much more fiscally impressive the SEC's new additions are than USC and UCLA.

www.pennlive.com

I'll save you a click if you just want to see the 1-16 wealth ranking.

16. Vandy
15. Mizzou
14. Kentucky
13. Mississippi st.
12. South Carolina
11. Mississippi
10. Texas A&M
9. Arkansas
8. Florida
7. LSU
6. Tennessee
5. Auburn
4. Alabama
3. Oklahoma
2. Georgia
1. Texas

 

[OneParticularHarbour]

Texas (UTjr) doesn't seem to get much with their money. I cannot remember them accomplishing anything big the last five years. They are going to hate getting that arse handed to them in every sport in the SEC.

 

[BakerMayfieldsMustache]

Texas (UTjr) doesn't seem to get much with their money. I cannot remember them accomplishing anything big the last five years. They are going to hate getting that arse handed to them in every sport in the SEC.

The old joke with OU fans is Texas accomplishes the least with the most. Their NFL draft record is so bad it's hard to even understand given the talent they regularly bring in. It's like Austin is where NFL talent goes to die.

Baseball and basketball will be fun as hell in the SEC though. Texas is solid there. Their big winner is swimming but I don't know anything about the SEC's swimming scene. Same thing with OU and gymnastics and softball. We win a bunch of national championships in those sports, but who cares?

 

[boutime]

Texas will be just fine in the SEC, including football. OU was the school hoping for one more year to get SEC ready.

 

[BakerMayfieldsMustache]

Texas will be just fine in the SEC, including football. OU was the school hoping for one more year to get SEC ready.

OU has 12 losing season's in 114 years (and none of you reading this has a team that can even touch that) No serious person is worried about the OU program succeeding. I think the SEC will give Texas a chance to shake off their annual 8-5 mentality though. It's get better or get wrecked time. The pressure could be program changing for yall.

 

[Bigwilly64]

Article breaking down how much more money the SEC brought in adding Oklahoma and texas than the Big10 did bringing in Ucla and Usc.

Which are the richest and poorest SEC football programs? (And where do Texas and Oklahoma fit in?) | Jones

On Thursday, we showed you Big Ten football revenue figures from the U.S. Department of Education's annual Equity in Athletics data dump. Now it's time for the Southeastern Conference. And you will see how much more fiscally impressive the SEC's new additions are than USC and UCLA.

www.pennlive.com

I'll save you a click if you just want to see the 1-16 wealth ranking.

16. Vandy
15. Mizzou
14. Kentucky
13. Mississippi st.
12. South Carolina
11. Mississippi
10. Texas A&M
9. Arkansas
8. Florida
7. LSU
6. Tennessee
5. Auburn
4. Alabama
3. Oklahoma
2. Georgia
1. Texas

The ROI looks pretty sh*tty for everyone except 2 and 4.

 

[Bolden1983]

Article breaking down how much more money the SEC brought in adding Oklahoma and texas than the Big10 did bringing in Ucla and Usc.

Which are the richest and poorest SEC football programs? (And where do Texas and Oklahoma fit in?) | Jones

On Thursday, we showed you Big Ten football revenue figures from the U.S. Department of Education's annual Equity in Athletics data dump. Now it's time for the Southeastern Conference. And you will see how much more fiscally impressive the SEC's new additions are than USC and UCLA.

www.pennlive.com

I'll save you a click if you just want to see the 1-16 wealth ranking.

16. Vandy
15. Mizzou
14. Kentucky
13. Mississippi st.
12. South Carolina
11. Mississippi
10. Texas A&M
9. Arkansas
8. Florida
7. LSU
6. Tennessee
5. Auburn
4. Alabama
3. Oklahoma
2. Georgia
1. Texas

We thank you for your money, your softball team, and being a CFP playoff doormat for the SEC each each year.

 

[BakerMayfieldsMustache]

The ROI looks pretty sh*tty for everyone except 2 and 4.

Yeah we were discussing the method on the homeboard some. There's how much money you bring in and then there's how you spend that money. Lots of room for nuance and argument. This is really just the revenue each program creates/generates.

It doesn't account for wealthy donors either, which both OU and Texas have obviously, but so do a lot of SEC schools.

 

[BakerMayfieldsMustache]

We thank you for your money, your softball team, and being a CFP playoff doormat for the SEC each each year.

You're welcome. I look forward to your homeboard whining about OU joining the conference and stealing your recruits and wins in the future.

 

[dp rtr]

You're welcome. I look forward to your homeboard whining about OU joining the conference and stealing your recruits and wins in the future.

I mean, you guys are going to halve to win a playoff game well before that happens right? Until then, the stealing of recruits will continue to go the way it’s gone for a while.

 

[WM Vol]

Texas (UTjr) doesn't seem to get much with their money. I cannot remember them accomplishing anything big the last five years. They are going to hate getting that arse handed to them in every sport in the SEC.

just the last 5 years?

 

[OneParticularHarbour]

just the last 5 years?

Come on WM, I was just trying to be polite. Texas has some really bad things coming their way as they enter the SEC meat grinder and I didn't want to speak too many truths.

 

[Tuamuchspeed]

OU has 12 losing season's in 114 years (and none of you reading this has a team that can even touch that) No serious person is worried about the OU program succeeding. I think the SEC will give Texas a chance to shake off their annual 8-5 mentality though. It's get better or get wrecked time. The pressure could be program changing for yall.

Bama has 11 losing seasons in 119 years. So, yeah, pretty sure we can touch that. OU has done well beating up on nobodies in the B12 though.

 

[BakerMayfieldsMustache]

Bama has 11 losing seasons in 119 years. So, yeah, pretty sure we can touch that. OU has done well beating up on nobodies in the B12 though.

The most salt from Bama over being poor is the best development of this thread so far. But then again you guys claim "18" national championships so it's not that surprising really.

Also it's not your fault. Auburn being where it is on the list takes up a lot of resources. If Alabama was more of a one team state it would likely be higher.

 

[Bigwilly64]

The most salt from Bama over being poor is the best development of this thread so far. But then again you guys claim "18" national championships so it's not that surprising really.

Also it's not your fault. Auburn being where it is on the list takes up a lot of resources. If Alabama was more of a one team state it would likely be higher.

Alabama has about as many undisputed titles since the BCS era as OU has in 114 years. You might should stick to something that OU is better prepared to discuss, like meaningless Heismans that don’t result in championships.

 

[boutime]

Sooners coming out of the woodwork like cockroaches.

 

[Tuamuchspeed]

The most salt from Bama over being poor is the best development of this thread so far. But then again you guys claim "18" national championships so it's not that surprising really.

Also it's not your fault. Auburn being where it is on the list takes up a lot of resources. If Alabama was more of a one team state it would likely be higher.

You swung at the King. You missed. No need to get down. It's normal.

 

[KirbAppeal]

You're welcome. I look forward to your homeboard whining about OU joining the conference and stealing your recruits and wins in the future.

I can’t wait for the rude awakening. Where do you think you’ll slot in? Somewhere between Auburn and South Carolina?

 

[Bolden1983]

I can’t wait for the rude awakening. Where do you think you’ll slot in? Somewhere between Auburn and South Carolina?

We saw how the conference champ and runner up fared against Bama and UGA.

 

[KirbAppeal]

We saw how the conference champ and runner up fared against Bama and UGA.

Yep. We just wanted their oil money to make UGA and Bama more powerful. No brainer really.

 

[GCJerryUSC]

Take a look at 3rd game 1957.

1957-South Carolina (ACC)​
9/21​	vs.	*Duke (6-3-2)	L	14​	26​
9/28​	vs.	Wofford (non-IA)	W	26​	0​
10/5​	@	Texas (6-4-1)	W	27​	21​
10/12​	vs.	Furman (3-7)	W	58​	13​
10/24​	vs.	*Clemson (7-3)	L	0​	13​
11/2​	vs.	*Maryland (5-5)	L	6​	10​
11/9​	@	*North Carolina (6-4)	L	6​	28​
11/16​	@	*Virginia (3-6-1)	W	13​	0​
11/23​	vs.	*North Carolina State (7-1-2)	L	26​	29​
11/30​	@	*Wake Forest (0-10)	W	26​	7​
	5-5-0​		202	147

 

[dp rtr]

Take a look at 3rd game 1957.

1957-South Carolina (ACC)​
9/21​	vs.	*Duke (6-3-2)	L	14​	26​
9/28​	vs.	Wofford (non-IA)	W	26​	0​
10/5​	@	Texas (6-4-1)	W	27​	21​
10/12​	vs.	Furman (3-7)	W	58​	13​
10/24​	vs.	*Clemson (7-3)	L	0​	13​
11/2​	vs.	*Maryland (5-5)	L	6​	10​
11/9​	@	*North Carolina (6-4)	L	6​	28​
11/16​	@	*Virginia (3-6-1)	W	13​	0​
11/23​	vs.	*North Carolina State (7-1-2)	L	26​	29​
11/30​	@	*Wake Forest (0-10)	W	26​	7​
	5-5-0​		202	147

Nothing like bringing up games from 65 years ago, am I right?

 

[Ichabod]

Nothing like bringing up games from 65 years ago, am I right?

Just proves South Carolina has a better chance than Texas at winning the Big 12 this year.