South end zone expansion question

travis.sixpack

Well-known member
Mar 3, 2008
1,035
1,030
113
Is demolishing the M-Club off the table? It seems like a major impediment to fully bowling in DWS. It’s not like it’s a major revenue generator. Also, it’s ugly as hell - new paint or no.

I think the video board is structurally separate from the M-Club bldg, so maybe you could build around it. A new M-Club facility could be incorporated into the end zone expansion.

What do y’all think happens with the south end zone?

ETA: Looking st the location of the south video board, I’m thinking it will have to go as well.
 
Last edited:

dawgstudent

Well-known member
Apr 15, 2003
36,638
9,988
113
Is demolishing the M-Club off the table? It seems like a major impediment to fully bowling in DWS. It’s not like it’s a major revenue generator. Also, it’s ugly as hell - new paint or no.

I think the video board is structurally separate from the M-Club bldg, so maybe you could build around it. A new M-Club facility could be incorporated into the end zone expansion.

What do y’all think happens with the south end zone?

ETA: Looking st the location of the south video board, I’m thinking it will have to go as well.
I think it all goes.
 

Cooterpoot

New member
Aug 29, 2012
4,239
2
0
MClub supposedly is staying but will be upgraded. And supposedly they aren't going to bowl it in either. Going to be mostly premium seating. Things change with time and that's going to be a couple years down the road following the west side reno.
 

Dawgpile

Well-known member
May 23, 2006
2,116
632
113
MClub supposedly is staying but will be upgraded. And supposedly they aren't going to bowl it in either. Going to be mostly premium seating. Things change with time and that's going to be a couple years down the road following the west side reno.

Disappointing if true. If you are of age to remember what lies beneath the MClub, is literally lipstick on a pig. It would be a shame IMO to waste more lipstick.
 

Maroonthirteen

New member
Aug 22, 2012
1,975
0
0
Yeah I can remember when the "field house" was a two story building with ac units in the windows. Then they built the current top level over the field house. However they did renovate and rebuild the interior of the field house around 2001.

use to be funny to watch State tip toe down one side of the frog legs and the opponent down the other side of the frog legs.
 
Last edited:

047Dog

New member
Jan 29, 2020
726
0
0
We will struggle to ever have a capacity crowd again. So why do we need a bowl with more seats that would be empty?
 

aTotal360

Well-known member
Nov 12, 2009
18,755
7,536
113
Because a 70% empty bowled-in stadium looks better than a 80% empty horseshoe. ***
 

Drebin

Well-known member
Aug 22, 2012
16,830
13,775
113
Cohen has gone on the record that the stadium will not be bowled in and there will be some updated/upgraded version of the M Club over there. Now, they can go a lot of different directions with that, but it's still a little disappointing to me.
 

Mobile Bay

Well-known member
Jul 26, 2020
3,843
1,539
113
Disappointing if true. If you are of age to remember what lies beneath the MClub, is literally lipstick on a pig. It would be a shame IMO to waste more lipstick.

Is that where the cursed Indian burial ground is?
 

DesotoCountyDawg

Well-known member
Nov 16, 2005
22,155
9,539
113
I think they are looking long term that crowd size is going to steadily decrease no matter what and they aren’t going to bowl it in because of that. You could go the route of bowling it in with an emphasis on premium seating but I think even that cost to benefit doesn’t pencil out either.
 

Drebin

Well-known member
Aug 22, 2012
16,830
13,775
113
I think they are looking long term that crowd size is going to steadily decrease no matter what and they aren’t going to bowl it in because of that. You could go the route of bowling it in with an emphasis on premium seating but I think even that cost to benefit doesn’t pencil out either.

I don't mind having a structure in the south endzone vs bowling it in. I just think the M Club in its current iteration is horrendous (although slightly less of one since it's been painted). If they built a new structure with a nice brick facade that covered more of the space from west to east and incorporated some premium seating/club levels, I think that would look great. And as stated elsewhere, seatbacks in the entire stadium.

I think there's a floor for attendance for SEC home games. It has been declining but overall, we're always going to have at least 45-50k in there for big SEC games.
 

Go Budaw

Member
Aug 22, 2012
7,321
0
36
I think they are looking long term that crowd size is going to steadily decrease no matter what and they aren’t going to bowl it in because of that. You could go the route of bowling it in with an emphasis on premium seating but I think even that cost to benefit doesn’t pencil out either.

The fact is that we just dumped $2.5 million into a project on the West Side upper deck that has, at best, a 10-year payback period (and more likely a 12-15 year payback period). Maybe that’s not so important for only a $2.5 million project, but its still a horrible cost / benefit.

Overall, cost / benefit is nice, but the money we rake in from SEC Network, etc. will be spent one way or another each year. That’s how you have dumb **** like $80 million for a practice facility at UGA. What’s the cost / benefit from building that?

We’re going to lose money in the short term (and sometimes the long term) on just about any major construction of renovation project that we pursue even for football, and that goes double for all the other sports. Same deal for every other SEC school that isn’t an elite. That still doesn’t mean we should just scrap any plans that will help improve atmosphere, attendance, and the product on the field. That’s LT thinking.
 

kired

Well-known member
Aug 22, 2008
6,482
1,445
113
Chairbacks for at least all lower levels, and close in the south end with something. Whether it's normal seating or premium, I don't care. But put something there to close it in. Surely we could make the capacity pretty much equal out what we lose with chairbacks vs. what we gain with the south endzone.
 

Drebin

Well-known member
Aug 22, 2012
16,830
13,775
113
The fact is that we just dumped $2.5 million into a project on the West Side upper deck that has, at best, a 10-year payback period (and more likely a 12-15 year payback period). Maybe that’s not so important for only a $2.5 million project, but its still a horrible cost / benefit.

Overall, cost / benefit is nice, but the money we rake in from SEC Network, etc. will be spent one way or another each year. That’s how you have dumb **** like $80 million for a practice facility at UGA. What’s the cost / benefit from building that?

We’re going to lose money in the short term (and sometimes the long term) on just about any major construction of renovation project that we pursue even for football, and that goes double for all the other sports. Same deal for every other SEC school that isn’t an elite. That still doesn’t mean we should just scrap any plans that will help improve atmosphere, attendance, and the product on the field. That’s LT thinking.

Lose money, yes. But they're paid for. At least we don't have to mortgage our future by taking out loans/bonds to build things. It's great to be in the SEC.
 

horshack.sixpack

Well-known member
Oct 30, 2012
9,073
5,076
113
They will incorporate the M-Club, hopefully in a way that looks good. Being able to start from scratch with everything around it should help.
 

IBleedMaroonDawg

Well-known member
Nov 12, 2007
23,164
7,195
113
I wish they would just chair back the entire stadium.

I think they should upgrade/chair back/whatever to work on upgrading or improving the lower levels. After that then focus on the upper levels before they do anything major on the South end. I know I live too far away to attend the games so I kinda don't have a dog in the fight but you can tell if the basic parts of the stadium are well built and people are enjoying being there to watch because usually those sections will be filled.

That's the biggest aspect that will improve the "look" of DWS in person or on television. They need to focus on keeping the basic and larger areas in the stadium filled every game and that will help fund whatever they want to do with the South end. Focus on the core and try to give the fans something other than aluminum benches and they will enjoy their experience and will invest in those season tickets.
 

horshack.sixpack

Well-known member
Oct 30, 2012
9,073
5,076
113
Because they are most likely moving to more premium seating in a lot more of the stadium. Seats that don't cramp you to sit in if you are over 3' tall.
 

Dawgg

Well-known member
Sep 9, 2012
7,620
6,222
113
They will incorporate the M-Club, hopefully in a way that looks good. Being able to start from scratch with everything around it should help.
It's funny. I feel like at this point, that building is just white noise behind the big screen. I don't even think about that it has some sort of functional use.
 

philduckworth

New member
Feb 20, 2015
2,228
0
0
We will struggle to ever have a capacity crowd again. So why do we need a bowl with more seats that would be empty?

I don't think anyone wants more seats. Most just don't want our stadium to look like a high school field b/c of the South End zone. And any sort of project that doesn't include demolishing the M-Club is not a good plan. If we chairback the lower half with cup holders and more room and add premium seating to the south end zone, it will enhance the fan experience, make our stadium look legit, and wouldn't add any seats.
 

AROB44

Active member
Mar 20, 2008
1,302
118
63
I don't think anyone wants more seats. Most just don't want our stadium to look like a high school field b/c of the South End zone. And any sort of project that doesn't include demolishing the M-Club is not a good plan. If we chairback the lower half with cup holders and more room and add premium seating to the south end zone, it will enhance the fan experience, make our stadium look legit, and wouldn't add any seats.

If anyone thinks our stadium looks like a high school stadium, please tell me where these high schools are? I've never seen them, and I have seen some impressive high school stadiums in Texas.
 

johnson86-1

Well-known member
Aug 22, 2012
12,235
2,465
113
Lose money, yes. But they're paid for. At least we don't have to mortgage our future by taking out loans/bonds to build things. It's great to be in the SEC.

How much does it cost to chairback? Do we have any lower level season tickets available? To me, you definitely want to chairback until you have a completely sold out lower level with season tickets. I would think you'd easily get enough of a premium to pay fo rthe chairback, and you don't lose anything but the game to game sale of some tickets. I'd love to chairback beyond that point, but if you start pushing people out of the lower level and offer them upper deck tickets, they may just drop their season tickets and be pretty pissed off.
 

615 Guy

Member
Jun 6, 2018
291
11
18
Expansion isn't needed, I'd use the term upgrade. Boone Pickens looks great and is not "bowled-in". As many posters have already mentioned, we should chair-back the entire stadium and focus on premium options which should include a new and larger facility in the south EZ similar to Boone Pickens. I'd prefer to have the nicest stadium in the country over being bowled-in.
 

Bullldawg78

Well-known member
Aug 30, 2018
1,165
728
113
I've seen the renderings as of 3 months ago it was going to be closed in no higher than MClub and mostly loge seating and a bunker area similar to the opposite side. But plans change.
 

Go Budaw

Member
Aug 22, 2012
7,321
0
36
Lose money, yes. But they're paid for. At least we don't have to mortgage our future by taking out loans/bonds to build things. It's great to be in the SEC.

I highly doubt that things like UGA’s practice facility are 100% paid for. I know for sure that our $80 million baseball stadium still isn’t paid for.

Everybody in this league puts **** on the credit card. The skyrocketing TV revenues make all of us very credit-worthy….which to your point makes it great to be in the SEC. But just about every possible venture we could make to improve atmosphere, fan experience, or attendance are going to be money losers from a crude balance sheet perspective….outside of the very long term. That still doesn’t mean we shouldn’t do them….because there are so many positive benefits (financial and otherwise) that don’t show up on a spreadsheet. And we have to spend the money somewhere, regardless.
 

Drebin

Well-known member
Aug 22, 2012
16,830
13,775
113
I highly doubt that things like UGA’s practice facility are 100% paid for. I know for sure that our $80 million baseball stadium still isn’t paid for.

Everybody in this league puts **** on the credit card. The skyrocketing TV revenues make all of us very credit-worthy….which to your point makes it great to be in the SEC. But just about every possible venture we could make to improve atmosphere, fan experience, or attendance are going to be money losers from a crude balance sheet perspective….outside of the very long term. That still doesn’t mean we shouldn’t do them….because there are so many positive benefits (financial and otherwise) that don’t show up on a spreadsheet. And we have to spend the money somewhere, regardless.

My point was this....if someone like Memphis wanted a new football stadium, it would become a political football (no pun intended) with debates on allocating state and local tax dollars to finance it with escalation clauses and minimum attendance requirements. We aren't in a situation like that.
 

philduckworth

New member
Feb 20, 2015
2,228
0
0
If anyone thinks our stadium looks like a high school stadium, please tell me where these high schools are? I've never seen them, and I have seen some impressive high school stadiums in Texas.

not having seats in the endzone is high schoolish. the view of the south endzone is high schoolish. did i really need to clarify this? I guess so.
 

philduckworth

New member
Feb 20, 2015
2,228
0
0
I've seen the renderings as of 3 months ago it was going to be closed in no higher than MClub and mostly loge seating and a bunker area similar to the opposite side. But plans change.

i've read that Cohen wants to keep the M-Club so that's already disappointing.
 

Go Budaw

Member
Aug 22, 2012
7,321
0
36
My point was this....if someone like Memphis wanted a new football stadium, it would become a political football (no pun intended) with debates on allocating state and local tax dollars to finance it with escalation clauses and minimum attendance requirements. We aren't in a situation like that.

That’s all certainly true.
 

horshack.sixpack

Well-known member
Oct 30, 2012
9,073
5,076
113
Honestly of things to want different, the looks of the M Club don’t bother me. I’m also an engineer with very little culture or taste…
 

Dawgg

Well-known member
Sep 9, 2012
7,620
6,222
113
Turn the M Club into a casino.

Have a Native American tribe claim the burial ground beneath the M Club is sacred Native land and bring about a lawsuit against the school to annex the M Club (and only that), then build a casino right into the stadium. Brilliant.

Not only would it make the stadium a destination again, it might also improve our chances of not blowing it we return the burial ground to the Natives.
 

Maroonthirteen

New member
Aug 22, 2012
1,975
0
0
My point was this....if someone like Memphis wanted a new football stadium, it would become a political football (no pun intended) with debates on allocating state and local tax dollars to finance it with escalation clauses and minimum attendance requirements. We aren't in a situation like that.

some of you guys closer to the AD will have to explain what is the deal with money.

State has a bigger athletic budget than Oregon St, Texas Tech, Vandy, and Memphis. Every one of the schools have plans to do $150-300 million dollar renovations or additions to their football stadium in the next few years. Yet Mississippi state is over here doing $30 million renovations. It's frustrating.
 

Drebin

Well-known member
Aug 22, 2012
16,830
13,775
113
some of you guys closer to the AD will have to explain what is the deal with money.

State has a bigger athletic budget than Oregon St, Texas Tech, Vandy, and Memphis. Every one of the schools have plans to do $150-300 million dollar renovations or additions to their football stadium in the next few years. Yet Mississippi state is over here doing $30 million renovations. It's frustrating.

Well, we have more than one project going at the same time, and most of them are fairly significant in scope. I don't have any complaints about how much we're spending today, given that we just finished the baseball stadium, we're elbow deep in the hump renovation, and we're working on football things. We've also made fairly significant investments in soccer, tennis, and softball.
 
Last edited:

patdog

Well-known member
May 28, 2007
48,404
12,121
113
It kind of does. But looking at that photo the first thing that glares out to me is had badly we need to update the lower-level seating on both the east and west sides.
 
Get unlimited access today.

Pick the right plan for you.

Already a member? Login