The Athletic on the Transfer Portal and JUCO Recruiting…

Maroon Eagle

Well-known member
May 24, 2006
16,468
5,407
102
Most juco signees, P5 programs, 2018-2023
PROGRAMJC SIGNEES
Colorado23
Kansas20
Mississippi State20
Kansas State17
Nebraska17
Oregon State17
Ole Miss16
West Virginia16
Arizona State15
TCU15
Missouri14
Tennessee14
Maryland14
Also:
Power 5 signees from junior college
RECRUITING CYCLEPOWER 5 SIGNEES
202358
202259
202145
2020101
2019112
2018129
 

greenbean.sixpack

Well-known member
Oct 6, 2012
6,114
4,680
113
According to my count, we have 14 JCs that have football. Not including California, the next most in any state is eight (Minnesota), even Texas and NY only have six and five respectively. AL, TN and LA, have none, with GA, FL and Ark have one each. Why is the poorest state in the nation supporting so many of these expensive football programs? We need to cut some or all, football does nothing to further these JCs. Yes I realize we've had some recruiting successes using our JCs, but the juice is not worth the squeeze.
 

Ranchdawg

Well-known member
Dec 13, 2012
3,103
2,259
113
STATE / TERRITORY NUMBER OF COMMUNITY COLLEGES PERCENT OF COMMUNITY COLLEGES
California 185 11.0
Texas 126 7.5
Ohio 86 5.1
Florida 82 4.9
Pennsylvania 81 4.8
New York 78 4.6
North Carolina 71 4.2
Illinois 67 4.0
Georgia 54 3.2
Virginia 49 2.9
Missouri 42 2.5
Washington 42 2.5
Tennessee 38 2.3
Minnesota 37 2.2
Arizona 36 2.1
Colorado 36 2.1
Kansas 33 2.0
South Carolina 32 1.9
Alabama 31 1.8
Michigan 31 1.8
Louisiana 30 1.8
Arkansas 27 1.6
Oklahoma 24 1.4
Massachusetts 23 1.4
New Jersey 23 1.4
Kentucky 22 1.3
Wisconsin 22 1.3
Maryland 21 1.2
New Mexico 21 1.2
Oregon 21 1.2
West Virginia 20 1.2
Iowa 19 1.1
Mississippi 19 1.1
Puerto Rico 17 1.0
Indiana 15 0.9
Connecticut 13 0.8
Nevada 11 0.7
Utah 11 0.7
Maine 10 0.6
Nebraska 10 0.6
Hawaii 9 0.5
New Hampshire 8 0.5
Wyoming 8 0.5
Montana 7 0.4
Idaho 6 0.4
North Dakota 6 0.4
South Dakota 5 0.3
Vermont 3 0.2
Alaska 2 0.1
Delaware 2 0.1
Rhode Island 2 0.1
American Samoa 1 0.1
District of Columbia 1 0.1
Federated States of Micronesia 1 0.1
Guam 1 0.1
Marshall Islands 1 0.1
Northern Marianas 1 0.1
Palau 1 0.1
 

Maroon Eagle

Well-known member
May 24, 2006
16,468
5,407
102
According to my count, we have 14 JCs that have football. Not including California, the next most in any state is eight (Minnesota), even Texas and NY only have six and five respectively. AL, TN and LA, have none, with GA, FL and Ark have one each. Why is the poorest state in the nation supporting so many of these expensive football programs? We need to cut some or all, football does nothing to further these JCs. Yes I realize we've had some recruiting successes using our JCs, but the juice is not worth the squeeze.
I'd disagree with the notion that football does nothing to further the junior colleges.

The Mississippi CCs already limit the scholarships they offer to out-of-state students and the remainder of whatever grants-in-aid are made are generally given to Mississippi students & providing access to inexpensive, quality education to Mississippians in their road to successful lives has long been a mandate given to the state's community colleges.

(I'm not saying that's their mission: that's a completely different educational definition.)

And athletics is just one pathway by which Mississippians can succeed.

With all that stated, the point you raise in your last sentence (and I put that in bold) is one similar to what I've also said.

Now that the transfer portal is a part of university athletics that I wouldn't be surprised to see MSU sign fewer & fewer juco student athletes.
 

greenbean.sixpack

Well-known member
Oct 6, 2012
6,114
4,680
113
I'd disagree with the notion that football does nothing to further the junior colleges.

The Mississippi CCs already limit the scholarships they offer to out-of-state students and the remainder of whatever grants-in-aid are made are generally given to Mississippi students & providing access to inexpensive, quality education to Mississippians in their road to successful lives has long been a mandate given to the state's community colleges.

(I'm not saying that's their mission: that's a completely different educational definition.)

And athletics is just one pathway by which Mississippians can succeed.

With all that stated, the point you raise in your last sentence (and I put that in bold) is one similar to what I've also said.

Now that the transfer portal is a part of university athletics that I wouldn't be surprised to see MSU sign fewer & fewer juco student athletes.
I appreciate a rational and reasonable response, i still disagree, but i can see where there is merit in your opinion.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Maroon Eagle

Ranchdawg

Well-known member
Dec 13, 2012
3,103
2,259
113
I'd disagree with the notion that football does nothing to further the junior colleges.

The Mississippi CCs already limit the scholarships they offer to out-of-state students and the remainder of whatever grants-in-aid are made are generally given to Mississippi students & providing access to inexpensive, quality education to Mississippians in their road to successful lives has long been a mandate given to the state's community colleges.

(I'm not saying that's their mission: that's a completely different educational definition.)

And athletics is just one pathway by which Mississippians can succeed.

With all that stated, the point you raise in your last sentence (and I put that in bold) is one similar to what I've also said.

Now that the transfer portal is a part of university athletics that I wouldn't be surprised to see MSU sign fewer & fewer juco student athletes.
Your last sentence is supported by the data you posted. I think we are already seeing CC players going to the lower divisions of the NCAA.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Maroon Eagle

DoggieDaddy13

Well-known member
Dec 23, 2017
2,748
1,055
113
You wanna talk about some cut throat recruiting. You should look into how the JCs are doing it now that the athletes can be recruited outside of counties that don't directly support the JC.
It's a lot more petty because the stakes are a lot smaller.
 

OG Goat Holder

Well-known member
Sep 30, 2022
7,643
7,223
113
Nationwide, it seems that the numbers would eventually settle out, but the big question is where. It's obvious now that it's less and less in the Power 5.

That said......I do think the JUCOs are still very valuable for MSU, because we have a system right here in our state that can find the overlooked 'overlooked' guys. Guys like Vick Ballard.
 

Maroon Eagle

Well-known member
May 24, 2006
16,468
5,407
102
You wanna talk about some cut throat recruiting. You should look into how the JCs are doing it now that the athletes can be recruited outside of counties that don't directly support the JC.
It's a lot more petty because the stakes are a lot smaller.

I know a few people who didn't like that they were bound to play sports for the JC in their district if the JC wanted them.

The only workaround was if they went out-of-state.
 
Get unlimited access today.

Pick the right plan for you.

Already a member? Login