Also:Most juco signees, P5 programs, 2018-2023
PROGRAM JC SIGNEES Colorado 23 Kansas 20 Mississippi State 20 Kansas State 17 Nebraska 17 Oregon State 17 Ole Miss 16 West Virginia 16 Arizona State 15 TCU 15 Missouri 14 Tennessee 14 Maryland 14
Power 5 signees from junior college
RECRUITING CYCLE POWER 5 SIGNEES 2023 58 2022 59 2021 45 2020 101 2019 112 2018 129
STATE / TERRITORY | NUMBER OF COMMUNITY COLLEGES | PERCENT OF COMMUNITY COLLEGES | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
California | 185 | 11.0 | ||
Texas | 126 | 7.5 | ||
Ohio | 86 | 5.1 | ||
Florida | 82 | 4.9 | ||
Pennsylvania | 81 | 4.8 | ||
New York | 78 | 4.6 | ||
North Carolina | 71 | 4.2 | ||
Illinois | 67 | 4.0 | ||
Georgia | 54 | 3.2 | ||
Virginia | 49 | 2.9 | ||
Missouri | 42 | 2.5 | ||
Washington | 42 | 2.5 | ||
Tennessee | 38 | 2.3 | ||
Minnesota | 37 | 2.2 | ||
Arizona | 36 | 2.1 | ||
Colorado | 36 | 2.1 | ||
Kansas | 33 | 2.0 | ||
South Carolina | 32 | 1.9 | ||
Alabama | 31 | 1.8 | ||
Michigan | 31 | 1.8 | ||
Louisiana | 30 | 1.8 | ||
Arkansas | 27 | 1.6 | ||
Oklahoma | 24 | 1.4 | ||
Massachusetts | 23 | 1.4 | ||
New Jersey | 23 | 1.4 | ||
Kentucky | 22 | 1.3 | ||
Wisconsin | 22 | 1.3 | ||
Maryland | 21 | 1.2 | ||
New Mexico | 21 | 1.2 | ||
Oregon | 21 | 1.2 | ||
West Virginia | 20 | 1.2 | ||
Iowa | 19 | 1.1 | ||
Mississippi | 19 | 1.1 | ||
Puerto Rico | 17 | 1.0 | ||
Indiana | 15 | 0.9 | ||
Connecticut | 13 | 0.8 | ||
Nevada | 11 | 0.7 | ||
Utah | 11 | 0.7 | ||
Maine | 10 | 0.6 | ||
Nebraska | 10 | 0.6 | ||
Hawaii | 9 | 0.5 | ||
New Hampshire | 8 | 0.5 | ||
Wyoming | 8 | 0.5 | ||
Montana | 7 | 0.4 | ||
Idaho | 6 | 0.4 | ||
North Dakota | 6 | 0.4 | ||
South Dakota | 5 | 0.3 | ||
Vermont | 3 | 0.2 | ||
Alaska | 2 | 0.1 | ||
Delaware | 2 | 0.1 | ||
Rhode Island | 2 | 0.1 | ||
American Samoa | 1 | 0.1 | ||
District of Columbia | 1 | 0.1 | ||
Federated States of Micronesia | 1 | 0.1 | ||
Guam | 1 | 0.1 | ||
Marshall Islands | 1 | 0.1 | ||
Northern Marianas | 1 | 0.1 | ||
Palau | 1 | 0.1 |
I'd disagree with the notion that football does nothing to further the junior colleges.According to my count, we have 14 JCs that have football. Not including California, the next most in any state is eight (Minnesota), even Texas and NY only have six and five respectively. AL, TN and LA, have none, with GA, FL and Ark have one each. Why is the poorest state in the nation supporting so many of these expensive football programs? We need to cut some or all, football does nothing to further these JCs. Yes I realize we've had some recruiting successes using our JCs, but the juice is not worth the squeeze.
I appreciate a rational and reasonable response, i still disagree, but i can see where there is merit in your opinion.I'd disagree with the notion that football does nothing to further the junior colleges.
The Mississippi CCs already limit the scholarships they offer to out-of-state students and the remainder of whatever grants-in-aid are made are generally given to Mississippi students & providing access to inexpensive, quality education to Mississippians in their road to successful lives has long been a mandate given to the state's community colleges.
(I'm not saying that's their mission: that's a completely different educational definition.)
And athletics is just one pathway by which Mississippians can succeed.
With all that stated, the point you raise in your last sentence (and I put that in bold) is one similar to what I've also said.
Now that the transfer portal is a part of university athletics that I wouldn't be surprised to see MSU sign fewer & fewer juco student athletes.
Your last sentence is supported by the data you posted. I think we are already seeing CC players going to the lower divisions of the NCAA.I'd disagree with the notion that football does nothing to further the junior colleges.
The Mississippi CCs already limit the scholarships they offer to out-of-state students and the remainder of whatever grants-in-aid are made are generally given to Mississippi students & providing access to inexpensive, quality education to Mississippians in their road to successful lives has long been a mandate given to the state's community colleges.
(I'm not saying that's their mission: that's a completely different educational definition.)
And athletics is just one pathway by which Mississippians can succeed.
With all that stated, the point you raise in your last sentence (and I put that in bold) is one similar to what I've also said.
Now that the transfer portal is a part of university athletics that I wouldn't be surprised to see MSU sign fewer & fewer juco student athletes.
You wanna talk about some cut throat recruiting. You should look into how the JCs are doing it now that the athletes can be recruited outside of counties that don't directly support the JC.
It's a lot more petty because the stakes are a lot smaller.