Bear in mind that, not only did FSU get down to their third quarterback, but they had multiple OL injuries going on as well.UGA and FSU had similar schedules and feats IMO. UGA probably had the easiest schedule in the SEC with non-conference cupcakes. That had to be on purpose.
FSU even worse because it’s the ACC. FSU is good, really good. But to me they don’t look as polished and as fast paced as AL or even GA.
Im not an Alabama fan, as a matter of fact i am kind of tired of seeing then at the top. But that aside- I agree with Alabama getting in and FSU not.
Six highest ranked conference champs. It's a fine line for sure.With the PAC12 going away and if they keep it at 6 automatic qualifiers for conference champs, you could get two GO5 teams in. I just wish they would put a minimum ranking requirement in place. Or else it will be like in the old BCS days where you had crappy Big East teams in the BCS games because the conference had a contract that put one of them in a BCS game and they dropped to being one of the worst conferences in FBS football.
Actually, the committee got it right. Does "the four BEST teams" not the "most deserving teams" ring a bell?I disagree and they do as well. Many reason why. Richard Sherman and rg3 make a lot of those points. The committee failed college football plain and simple.
Hmm, your first valid point.You can say that but it doesn’t make it true. There is a lot of discontent right now not linked to emotions. Either way the committee got it wrong because if you were picking the 4 best with the eye test Georgia should have been in.
I didn't quite get that last sentence.Idk about all that with the metric they use to define best. But I’m not going to argue with you. I’m just glad this bill crap is over.
I disagree and they do as well. Many reason why. Richard Sherman and rg3 make a lot of those points. The committee failed college football plain and simple.