The Buyout

Mad Max

All-American
Nov 28, 2015
3,314
6,459
93
Doesn't sound like the recipe for luring a good coach to come here as a replacement.
Oh No Comedy GIF by The Tonight Show Starring Jimmy Fallon
 
Apr 26, 2024
366
584
93
Best solution is to give the football team 0 revshare. Basically, make it bad for Stoops and he’ll leave. But, Mitch is too nice to do that. He’ll keep writing checks with a smile on his face.

That’s not the way that works. Using retaliatory tactics to get someone to quit is basically the same as firing them. It would open UK up not only to the buyout but a potential libelous lawsuit for damaging Stoops career.
 

Broker

All-Conference
Aug 29, 2012
1,327
1,277
113
In my opinion, I dont think we will have to worry about a buyout. I think either he will find a different program which probably be a smaller school with decent tradition or take early exit after next season if nothing improves. I believe nothing changes after this season, he may find another offensive coordinator. As much we need a new face, I still dont think Stoops will put the program in cuffs by continue to overstay. Stoops flirting with Texas am tells me he is willing to hear different opportunities. Also something to think about, there hasn't been a kentucky coach in my lifetime(40) that stayed entirely of their contract.
Stoops listening to A&M was considered a huge job upgrade for him. He might not be so eager to take a lesser job. A SEC coaching job is a major job compared to any conference coaching job except a couple of schools in BIG Ten. (MI, OSU)
 

Broker

All-Conference
Aug 29, 2012
1,327
1,277
113
After Saturdays debacle, your guess is as good as mine. My guess is, it makes Stoops look bad to consistently hire awful OCs. And that would, in all honesty, be accurate.
With Stoops looking like a dead man walking as UK's coach, how could he ever hire a good OC knowing it would be most likely a one year job and also be handcuffed to be an aggressive play caller. It won't and can't possibly happen. Stoops is a neutered coach when it comes to finding a really good proven OC.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TeamAmerica
Sep 2, 2002
5,725
5,458
113
There are going to be a lot of HC openings at the end of this year, I could see somebody coming for Stoops and he gets out before things go totally sour between him and the fan base. Hey after today Arkansas might be looking, he could reunite with Calipari!
 

Anon1757190905

Freshman
Sep 6, 2025
52
95
17
Nobody wants Stoops. Unlike our delusional fan base, everybody else thinks he’s a joke. There is no Div I program that wants a team with zero offense. Talk about a program killer and buzzkill hire he would be. Seriously, the only fanbase that has an ounce of respect for Stoops, is a small minority of UK’s, and those same fans think a season where we look horrible beating 3 MAC schools, Vandy and Miss St, is the equivalent of winning the Super Bowl. The fact is, we will no longer be able to even do that moving forward with our schedule and lack of talent and coaching. Get ready for multiple losing seasons in a row.
 
Last edited:
May 30, 2008
74
102
33
With Stoops looking like a dead man walking as UK's coach, how could he ever hire a good OC knowing it would be most likely a one year job and also be handcuffed to be an aggressive play caller. It won't and can't possibly happen. Stoops is a neutered coach when it comes to finding a really good proven OC.
So many on her know zilch about football, especially offense football. No OC will make the UK offense without better players. Eddie Gran was a good OC but became the scapegoat for the entire team. UK loses their top PRs to the transfer so you have to ask why? They left because of low expecations the fan base has for Stoops, that talk is cheap and that if you dont have a great QB in the SEC you are doomed to never make the playoffs. Is Cutter a great QB? would he start for any other SEC team other than UK?
 

satcheluk

All-Conference
Oct 4, 2009
3,089
4,311
113
MARK STOOPS BUYOUT
We see the 37.5M buyout and think it’s an impossible number. Truth is, it’s big but not as crushing as it looks. A school like Kentucky could handle it the same way others do major projects, through a bond or loan.

Spread over 10–20 years, the annual payments would be in the $3–5M range. That’s less than 10% of the SEC’s yearly revenue check (around $55–60M). The conference money alone could basically cover it.

So while it’s definitely not ideal, it’s not like the university would have to gut academics or hit fans with massive price hikes. It’s more of a long-term financial management question than an impossible wall.

Someone in finance tell me if I’m wrong and it’s not that simple.
His current buyout is over $50mm. ($9mm x remaining years of contract 5.75 or $51.75mm). In 2026 when the contract rolls over in July?, that drops to 80% of the same formula, so ($9mm x remaining years 5 or $45mm x .8= $36mm and the entire amount is due within 60 days of his firing, which makes it impossible to have an offset clause where the amount would be lowered when he takes a new job.
 

BlueBallzz

Freshman
Jul 3, 2025
58
64
18
His current buyout is over $50mm. ($9mm x remaining years of contract 5.75 or $51.75mm). In 2026 when the contract rolls over in July?, that drops to 80% of the same formula, so ($9mm x remaining years 5 or $45mm x .8= $36mm and the entire amount is due within 60 days of his firing, which makes it impossible to have an offset clause where the amount would be lowered when he takes a new job.
I believe after this year the buyout is around $40 million, not that it matters, they aren’t going to be buying him out anytime soon.
 

vhcat1970

All-Conference
Jul 2, 2025
1,467
1,123
113
His current buyout is over $50mm. ($9mm x remaining years of contract 5.75 or $51.75mm). In 2026 when the contract rolls over in July?, that drops to 80% of the same formula, so ($9mm x remaining years 5 or $45mm x .8= $36mm and the entire amount is due within 60 days of his firing, which makes it impossible to have an offset clause where the amount would be lowered when he takes a new job.
His taxes would be lower if he accepted the buyout over several years.
 

Los Gatos

Senior
Aug 12, 2003
1,501
799
63
Yes, but if he insist on a full payment within 60 days he has that money to invest. Would that be better after taxes than taking a payment spread over multiple years? Heck if I know.
 

Los Gatos

Senior
Aug 12, 2003
1,501
799
63
His current buyout is over $50mm. ($9mm x remaining years of contract 5.75 or $51.75mm). In 2026 when the contract rolls over in July?, that drops to 80% of the same formula, so ($9mm x remaining years 5 or $45mm x .8= $36mm and the entire amount is due within 60 days of his firing, which makes it impossible to have an offset clause where the amount would be lowered when he takes a new job.
Hmm, this is the second time I've seen this calculation. However, multiple times I seen a different calculation. The later calculation make no mention of a 80% number. Instead those post insist it 75% instead of 80%. In addition they make no mention of it not dropping until next July.

I don't know which to believe.

Do you have a link to back up your numbers or have you read the contract?
 
  • Like
Reactions: satcheluk

Snarks

All-American
Jan 31, 2005
7,810
5,202
93
I believe after this year the buyout is around $40 million, not that it matters, they aren’t going to be buying him out anytime soon.
100% agree. Mitch made a boneheaded deal and we’re gonna be stuck with it. Hoping the new schedule will scare him off.
 

satcheluk

All-Conference
Oct 4, 2009
3,089
4,311
113
I believe after this year the buyout is around $40 million, not that it matters, they aren’t going to be buying him out anytime soon.
There's no need to believe when I literally wrote what is in his contract. The only variable I am not sure about is the actual date when it drops from 100% of his remaining contract to 80%. I believe it is in July when his contract year rolls over. That means from after the final game this season, until that date, his buyout is $45mm. The day it rolls over and his buyout drops to 80% of remining salary, then it will drop to $36mm.
 

satcheluk

All-Conference
Oct 4, 2009
3,089
4,311
113
His taxes would be lower if he accepted the buyout over several years.
lol, really? Which tax bracket do you think he falls in if he takes, say, $1mm per year for 36 years?

Single filers
  • 10% on income up to $12,400
  • 12% on income from $12,401 to $50,400
  • 22% on income from $50,401 to $105,700
  • 24% on income from $105,701 to $201,775
  • 32% on income from $201,776 to $256,225
  • 35% on income from $256,226 to $640,600
  • 37% on income over $640,600
 
  • Like
Reactions: mhs1964

satcheluk

All-Conference
Oct 4, 2009
3,089
4,311
113
Hmm, this is the second time I've seen this calculation. However, multiple times I seen a different calculation. The later calculation make no mention of a 80% number. Instead those post insist it 75% instead of 80%. In addition they make no mention of it not dropping until next July.

I don't know which to believe.

Do you have a link to back up your numbers or have you read the contract?
You have to read the contract and it's a bit confusing because each contract extension is filed as an addendum to the original, so only the language that differs from the original is presented. The 100%/80%/60% buyout clause is clearly explained, though the dates those milestones hit are less clear.
 

entropy13

All-American
Apr 27, 2010
3,294
6,213
113
Because of Glitch Brainfart's horrible negotiating skills, if we do want to get rid of Stoops after this year, UK Athletics' only viable option would seem to be to get a loan for whatever the buyout amount is. That way, the buyout amount becomes an accounting line-item (albeit, a substantial one), rather than an insurmountable hurdle that's due all at once. Hopefully they can arrange a sweetheart deal at a favorable interest rate with Central Bank or something.
 

entropy13

All-American
Apr 27, 2010
3,294
6,213
113
Borrowing money to pay an ex coach is not a winning financial strategy. In all reality a new coach will not make the football any more money than the old coach.
I agree, it's not, and it's due to our AD's sh!tty contract negotiations. Unless there's a pile of money somewhere, though, it's the only semi-viable way out that's apparent to me.

Of course, this discussion is contingent on the football team having another miserable season. As a fan, I hope that doesn't happen. IF it does, though, and fan support craters, Barnhart will be stuck between a rock and a hard place.
 

satcheluk

All-Conference
Oct 4, 2009
3,089
4,311
113
Because of Glitch Brainfart's horrible negotiating skills, if we do want to get rid of Stoops after this year, UK Athletics' only viable option would seem to be to get a loan for whatever the buyout amount is. That way, the buyout amount becomes an accounting line-item (albeit, a substantial one), rather than an insurmountable hurdle that's due all at once. Hopefully they can arrange a sweetheart deal at a favorable interest rate with Central Bank or something.
Debt payoff schedule for $36mm at 4.9% interest and paying a fixed $250k a month until it is gone. You can pay off your debts in 218 months (18 years and 2 months) by making fixed payments of $250,000.00 every month. You will need to pay a total of $54,400,598.23, of which the total interest is $18,400,598.23. This is what you were thinking? lol
 

Los Gatos

Senior
Aug 12, 2003
1,501
799
63
You have to read the contract and it's a bit confusing because each contract extension is filed as an addendum to the original, so only the language that differs from the original is presented. The 100%/80%/60% buyout clause is clearly explained, though the dates those milestones hit are less clear.
Thanks, I tried to read the contract several years ago. I'd say it's more than a bit confusing. I'm not an attorney and gave up.

Thanks for the reply.
 

entropy13

All-American
Apr 27, 2010
3,294
6,213
113
Debt payoff schedule for $36mm at 4.9% interest and paying a fixed $250k a month until it is gone. You can pay off your debts in 218 months (18 years and 2 months) by making fixed payments of $250,000.00 every month. You will need to pay a total of $54,400,598.23, of which the total interest is $18,400,598.23. This is what you were thinking? lol
Your math is just one half of the picture. The other half of the picture is that UK Athletics' budget for 2024-25 shows revenues of $188.4 million (an increase of over 5% for each from the prior year). Let's assume for the sake of discussion that revenue increases at 3% annually, which is conservative. Total projected revenues using the same 18-year, 2-month period would be about $4.42 billion (I think my math is right, LOL). Your total payment figure above would amount to 1.23% of total revenues over that time period. With 5% revenue growth, total revenues would be $5.375 billion, and the % even smaller, a hair over 1%.

While not great, it's manageable, and the above assumes no help from boosters, which would lighten the load. Anyway, we're only having this discussion because our AD is a dolt when it comes to contract negotiations.