Doesn't sound like the recipe for luring a good coach to come here as a replacement.

Doesn't sound like the recipe for luring a good coach to come here as a replacement.
Best solution is to give the football team 0 revshare. Basically, make it bad for Stoops and he’ll leave. But, Mitch is too nice to do that. He’ll keep writing checks with a smile on his face.
Stoops listening to A&M was considered a huge job upgrade for him. He might not be so eager to take a lesser job. A SEC coaching job is a major job compared to any conference coaching job except a couple of schools in BIG Ten. (MI, OSU)In my opinion, I dont think we will have to worry about a buyout. I think either he will find a different program which probably be a smaller school with decent tradition or take early exit after next season if nothing improves. I believe nothing changes after this season, he may find another offensive coordinator. As much we need a new face, I still dont think Stoops will put the program in cuffs by continue to overstay. Stoops flirting with Texas am tells me he is willing to hear different opportunities. Also something to think about, there hasn't been a kentucky coach in my lifetime(40) that stayed entirely of their contract.
With Stoops looking like a dead man walking as UK's coach, how could he ever hire a good OC knowing it would be most likely a one year job and also be handcuffed to be an aggressive play caller. It won't and can't possibly happen. Stoops is a neutered coach when it comes to finding a really good proven OC.After Saturdays debacle, your guess is as good as mine. My guess is, it makes Stoops look bad to consistently hire awful OCs. And that would, in all honesty, be accurate.
You say that like it is an accomplishment. Being the winningest all time coach at UK is like being the smartest kid in special ED, not really that impressive.Fire your winningest all time coach while paying a massive buyout in favor of a HS coach and you call Barnhardt dumb?
OuchYou say that like it is an accomplishment. Being the winningest all time coach at UK is like being the smartest kid in special ED, not really that impressive.
Agreed. Give anyone enough time at a singleYou say that like it is an accomplishment. Being the winningest all time coach at UK is like being the smartest kid in special ED, not really that impressive.
So many on her know zilch about football, especially offense football. No OC will make the UK offense without better players. Eddie Gran was a good OC but became the scapegoat for the entire team. UK loses their top PRs to the transfer so you have to ask why? They left because of low expecations the fan base has for Stoops, that talk is cheap and that if you dont have a great QB in the SEC you are doomed to never make the playoffs. Is Cutter a great QB? would he start for any other SEC team other than UK?With Stoops looking like a dead man walking as UK's coach, how could he ever hire a good OC knowing it would be most likely a one year job and also be handcuffed to be an aggressive play caller. It won't and can't possibly happen. Stoops is a neutered coach when it comes to finding a really good proven OC.
His current buyout is over $50mm. ($9mm x remaining years of contract 5.75 or $51.75mm). In 2026 when the contract rolls over in July?, that drops to 80% of the same formula, so ($9mm x remaining years 5 or $45mm x .8= $36mm and the entire amount is due within 60 days of his firing, which makes it impossible to have an offset clause where the amount would be lowered when he takes a new job.MARK STOOPS BUYOUT
We see the 37.5M buyout and think it’s an impossible number. Truth is, it’s big but not as crushing as it looks. A school like Kentucky could handle it the same way others do major projects, through a bond or loan.
Spread over 10–20 years, the annual payments would be in the $3–5M range. That’s less than 10% of the SEC’s yearly revenue check (around $55–60M). The conference money alone could basically cover it.
So while it’s definitely not ideal, it’s not like the university would have to gut academics or hit fans with massive price hikes. It’s more of a long-term financial management question than an impossible wall.
Someone in finance tell me if I’m wrong and it’s not that simple.
TBF, 15 of those losses were to UGA and Bama and he is well over .500 against teams at .500 and below. He needs to be better than the last few years, but he was looking great pre 2023.3-35 against sec teams with a winning record
I believe after this year the buyout is around $40 million, not that it matters, they aren’t going to be buying him out anytime soon.His current buyout is over $50mm. ($9mm x remaining years of contract 5.75 or $51.75mm). In 2026 when the contract rolls over in July?, that drops to 80% of the same formula, so ($9mm x remaining years 5 or $45mm x .8= $36mm and the entire amount is due within 60 days of his firing, which makes it impossible to have an offset clause where the amount would be lowered when he takes a new job.
Uhm I'm afraid he's a couple years too late for that.I could see somebody coming for Stoops and he gets out before things go totally sour between him and the fan base.
His taxes would be lower if he accepted the buyout over several years.His current buyout is over $50mm. ($9mm x remaining years of contract 5.75 or $51.75mm). In 2026 when the contract rolls over in July?, that drops to 80% of the same formula, so ($9mm x remaining years 5 or $45mm x .8= $36mm and the entire amount is due within 60 days of his firing, which makes it impossible to have an offset clause where the amount would be lowered when he takes a new job.
Hmm, this is the second time I've seen this calculation. However, multiple times I seen a different calculation. The later calculation make no mention of a 80% number. Instead those post insist it 75% instead of 80%. In addition they make no mention of it not dropping until next July.His current buyout is over $50mm. ($9mm x remaining years of contract 5.75 or $51.75mm). In 2026 when the contract rolls over in July?, that drops to 80% of the same formula, so ($9mm x remaining years 5 or $45mm x .8= $36mm and the entire amount is due within 60 days of his firing, which makes it impossible to have an offset clause where the amount would be lowered when he takes a new job.
100% agree. Mitch made a boneheaded deal and we’re gonna be stuck with it. Hoping the new schedule will scare him off.I believe after this year the buyout is around $40 million, not that it matters, they aren’t going to be buying him out anytime soon.
There's no need to believe when I literally wrote what is in his contract. The only variable I am not sure about is the actual date when it drops from 100% of his remaining contract to 80%. I believe it is in July when his contract year rolls over. That means from after the final game this season, until that date, his buyout is $45mm. The day it rolls over and his buyout drops to 80% of remining salary, then it will drop to $36mm.I believe after this year the buyout is around $40 million, not that it matters, they aren’t going to be buying him out anytime soon.
lol, really? Which tax bracket do you think he falls in if he takes, say, $1mm per year for 36 years?His taxes would be lower if he accepted the buyout over several years.
You have to read the contract and it's a bit confusing because each contract extension is filed as an addendum to the original, so only the language that differs from the original is presented. The 100%/80%/60% buyout clause is clearly explained, though the dates those milestones hit are less clear.Hmm, this is the second time I've seen this calculation. However, multiple times I seen a different calculation. The later calculation make no mention of a 80% number. Instead those post insist it 75% instead of 80%. In addition they make no mention of it not dropping until next July.
I don't know which to believe.
Do you have a link to back up your numbers or have you read the contract?
I agree, it's not, and it's due to our AD's sh!tty contract negotiations. Unless there's a pile of money somewhere, though, it's the only semi-viable way out that's apparent to me.Borrowing money to pay an ex coach is not a winning financial strategy. In all reality a new coach will not make the football any more money than the old coach.
Debt payoff schedule for $36mm at 4.9% interest and paying a fixed $250k a month until it is gone. You can pay off your debts in 218 months (18 years and 2 months) by making fixed payments of $250,000.00 every month. You will need to pay a total of $54,400,598.23, of which the total interest is $18,400,598.23. This is what you were thinking? lolBecause of Glitch Brainfart's horrible negotiating skills, if we do want to get rid of Stoops after this year, UK Athletics' only viable option would seem to be to get a loan for whatever the buyout amount is. That way, the buyout amount becomes an accounting line-item (albeit, a substantial one), rather than an insurmountable hurdle that's due all at once. Hopefully they can arrange a sweetheart deal at a favorable interest rate with Central Bank or something.
Don't kid yourself, Stoops is still decently well regarded in the fan base as a whole. He hasn't gotten to "joker's last year" levels of hatred...... yet.Uhm I'm afraid he's a couple years too late for that.
Thanks, I tried to read the contract several years ago. I'd say it's more than a bit confusing. I'm not an attorney and gave up.You have to read the contract and it's a bit confusing because each contract extension is filed as an addendum to the original, so only the language that differs from the original is presented. The 100%/80%/60% buyout clause is clearly explained, though the dates those milestones hit are less clear.
Your math is just one half of the picture. The other half of the picture is that UK Athletics' budget for 2024-25 shows revenues of $188.4 million (an increase of over 5% for each from the prior year). Let's assume for the sake of discussion that revenue increases at 3% annually, which is conservative. Total projected revenues using the same 18-year, 2-month period would be about $4.42 billion (I think my math is right, LOL). Your total payment figure above would amount to 1.23% of total revenues over that time period. With 5% revenue growth, total revenues would be $5.375 billion, and the % even smaller, a hair over 1%.Debt payoff schedule for $36mm at 4.9% interest and paying a fixed $250k a month until it is gone. You can pay off your debts in 218 months (18 years and 2 months) by making fixed payments of $250,000.00 every month. You will need to pay a total of $54,400,598.23, of which the total interest is $18,400,598.23. This is what you were thinking? lol