the LA Tech game might be moved to Shreveport. Does that make any difference on your decision to attend the game?
Stansfield said:Bring back the cheerleader pics to the ticker!!!
perhaps a bonus of moving to shreveport is that it's closer to dallas and houston, where we have lots of alumni. that's one reason jackie wanted to play texas and later, u of h. this surely wouldn't be the main reason for moving though. i wonder if la tech has a larger alumni base in shreveport.being in Louisiana where we don't have a huge alumni
dawgstudent said:Shreveport - Coach34 might actually go to his first MSU football game in 5 years.
lawdawg02 said:i gotta think more people would actually make the trip if it's in shreveport. it's not that much further (an hour on the interstate), and there are actually places to stay (casinos) and things to do (casinos). granted, it's no attractive vacation hotspot, but i'm sure few state fans were planning on spending a couple of days in ruston.
if i were la tech, i would only consider moving if i'm making more money. otherwise, i want the national coverage to come to my campus, and show the "biggest game in ruston" in a long time (or whatever they'll call it).
techdawg86 wrote:
Don't people do this all the time in your state (i.e., stay in Tunica, drive to Oxford for the game on Saturday)?
</p>
Fletch Fletcher said:techdawg86 wrote:
Don't people do this all the time in your state (i.e., stay in Tunica, drive to Oxford for the game on Saturday)?
</p>
Considering that Mississippi State isn't located in Oxford, that wouldn't make much sense.
</p>