I know it's been discussed on here in the past but how much is each SEC team getting now?They are still only pulling $30 mill per year even now, which is on par with the terrible ACC deal that everyone is trying to get out of.
I know it's been discussed on here in the past but how much is each SEC team getting now?They are still only pulling $30 mill per year even now, which is on par with the terrible ACC deal that everyone is trying to get out of.
I could see Stanford maybe going independent while it continues to push for a Big 10 invite.I don’t think anyone who bolted to the Big 12 made a bad decision per sé, but the important thing to remember is that none of them are going to be married to them for the long haul. Big 12 appears to be in much better shape over the short term, but that can always change if the SEC or B1G decide to go bigger. They are still only pulling $30 mill per year even now, which is on par with the terrible ACC deal that everyone is trying to get out of.
So, SEC and B1G still have all those Big 12 schools available as gap fillers whenever the need arises.
Cal and Stanford, who knows? I can see them being fine if they just persuade OSU / WSU and some MWC teams to form together for a PAC-XX 2.0, under the condition that they get a larger stake in TV revenue like OU and TX had in the Big 12. That will keep them afloat for the time being. Question is, does the Big 12 want them, and would they be interested? Any more fleeting B1G interest? I think they still have at least some options.
It certainly could be but I think if there was desire to not have us in the conference that would have already happened. Those 2 teams didn’t get in this spot because of their conference didn’t want them, they just were left out when their conference blew up. If the sec blows up, I fully expect state to be in the same spot as Washington state and Oregon state.I’m looking at Oregon St and Wazzu and thinking that could be us sooner than we’d like to admit. People will say “charter member” but if conference realignment has taught us anything it’s that these presidents are very good at getting out of what seemed like airtight obligations.
I could see Stanford maybe going independent while it continues to push for a Big 10 invite.
Big 12 should be safe for the long term. There’s just nobody left that would even move the needle for the SEC or Big 10.
Even if Big 12 does lose 1 or 2 schools (most likely would be Kansas to Big 10 or Okie St or TCU to SEC), they’d still have a solid conference remaining. Long term, it’s probably safer than any conference other than SEC or Big 10.Regarding Stanford, that’s yet another option they have. Cal, too.
Regarding Big 12, it all depends on the future. They’re probably good for 5-10 years, maybe. But the next round of chaos from the inevitable ACC collapse, whenever it occurs, is going to bring a lot of those teams back into the fold. B1G having only 4 of 18 teams on the West coast and everyone else 2,000 miles away still isn’t a good setup for them. They may need more schools to bridge that gap in the future. And the SEC might need number evening additions after they get whatever they need from the ACC.
I know it's been discussed on here in the past but how much is each SEC team getting now?
Only an idiot like you thinks the Cincinnati market put a conference over the top. Isn't it time you changed your name again@catvet for the loss
That move basically ensured their survival. Not sure if you've noticed, but PAC teams are now begging for Big 12 invites
Just an incredibly stupid take
PAC is imploding in real time, only Stanford, Cal, Washington State and Oregon State are left, and I believe the ACC is on the verge of fracturing, Clemson and FSU want out bad...I think SEC, B1G and Big 12 will be the eventual winnersThat’s a pretty good conference. And pretty geographic with 3 exceptions. For now, #4 behind ACC. If grant of rights can be worked around, they move up to a solid #3. If grant of rights can’t be worked around (odds are still very high in my opinion), who knows what the landscape will look like 10 years from now. I suspect the media rights bubble will have burst by then. So all bets are off.
No doubt. We’ll see on the ACC breaking up. I know FSU is trying to bring in private equity firms. But they’re going to want a double digit return in their investment. And if they can’t get around a pretty iron clad grant of rights agreement, I just don’t see the return. And if they can get around it, why do they need private equity? Either way, ACC is toxic and it’s a question of when, not if, it falls apart. I’d rather be in the Big 12 for sure.PAC is imploding in real time, only Stanford, Cal, Washington State and Oregon State are left, and I believe the ACC is on the verge of fracturing, Clemson and FSU want out bad...I think SEC, B1G and Big 12 will be the eventual winners
Why would anyone think being a charter member counts for something? Is this like the "but look at our baseball stadium" kind of take? It's not just players but entire teams are now in the portal looking for better deals. Why keep State if it makes less money for the conference than someone else? Ya think there are principles and ethics that matter now in amateur athletics?Charter member means nothing. It never has, despite the old rumor. But there is ZERO interest from anyone in the SEC in kicking anyone out. That will never happen. Even if the top 30 schools nationwide were to break away (and there’s zero indication that is or will even be considered), we’d still be in a pretty good SEC.
Hopefully we won't just have players in the portal every year, coaches moving to the highest bidder but also teams in the portal and conferences doing a lot of reshuffling on an annual basis.***That’s a pretty good conference. And pretty geographic with 3 exceptions. For now, #4 behind ACC. If grant of rights can be worked around, they move up to a solid #3. If grant of rights can’t be worked around (odds are still very high in my opinion), who knows what the landscape will look like 10 years from now. I suspect the media rights bubble will have burst by then. So all bets are off.
And pretty geographic with 3 exceptions.
Divisions are dead. In your scenario, you’d effectively have two separate leagues. Whether 16, 18, 20, or more, it’s gonna be permanent plus rotating opponents with top two playing in the championship game.
It’s not so much that the Cincinnati market put the Big 12 over the top, but think about it like this… when Texas and OU left the Big 12, it was like removing a leg from a 3 legged table.Only an idiot like you thinks the Cincinnati market put a conference over the top. Isn't it time you changed your name again