Time to re-post a jewel from Bulldog Backer....

Coach34

New member
Jul 20, 2012
20,283
1
0
"<span style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Times New Roman','serif'">People who have actually "seen" Anthony Dixon so far this year knows he is a different back than last year. He is faster, stronger, and is using his power to run through tackles. Depending on number of carries, he may get 1500+ yards this year and actually get some votes for the Heisman. La Tech is not going to stop him...we control the clock, we control the score. It will be what Croom wants it to be. The center of our offensive line dominates the line of scrimmage. "
</span>

<span style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Times New Roman','serif'">

great great stuff</span></p>
 

Coach34

New member
Jul 20, 2012
20,283
1
0
"<span style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Times New Roman','serif'">People who have actually "seen" Anthony Dixon so far this year knows he is a different back than last year. He is faster, stronger, and is using his power to run through tackles. Depending on number of carries, he may get 1500+ yards this year and actually get some votes for the Heisman. La Tech is not going to stop him...we control the clock, we control the score. It will be what Croom wants it to be. The center of our offensive line dominates the line of scrimmage. "
</span>

<span style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Times New Roman','serif'">

great great stuff</span></p>
 

Coach34

New member
Jul 20, 2012
20,283
1
0
"<span style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Times New Roman','serif'">People who have actually "seen" Anthony Dixon so far this year knows he is a different back than last year. He is faster, stronger, and is using his power to run through tackles. Depending on number of carries, he may get 1500+ yards this year and actually get some votes for the Heisman. La Tech is not going to stop him...we control the clock, we control the score. It will be what Croom wants it to be. The center of our offensive line dominates the line of scrimmage. "
</span>

<span style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Times New Roman','serif'">

great great stuff</span></p>
 

josebrown

Well-known member
Aug 4, 2008
2,191
619
113
Coach34 said:
"<span style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: ' Times: ; 39: ; serif: ">People who have actually "seen" Anthony Dixon so far this year knows he is a different back than last year. He is faster, stronger, and is using his power to run through tackles. Depending on number of carries, he may get 1500+ yards this year and actually get some votes for the Heisman. La Tech is not going to stop him...we control the clock, we control the score. It will be what Croom wants it to be. The center of our offensive line dominates the line of scrimmage. "
</span>

<span style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: ' Times: ; 39: ; serif: ">

great great stuff</span></p>
That part is true,,,McCroomvey stopped him.
 

hatfieldms

Well-known member
Feb 20, 2008
8,338
1,613
113
Coach do you have any quotes from you last year predicting us to finish with 3-4 wins? Backer does say some stupid stuff but you definitely get your fair share in
 

Croomp

New member
Jun 25, 2008
1,484
0
0
cant say anything bad about Dixon from that game. Croom was the reason Dixon didn't do bettter than he did.
 

bulldogbaja

New member
Dec 18, 2007
2,683
0
0
Out of all the things you could have called him out on, you pick this? Dixon averaged over 5 yards/carry.
Since we DIDN'T use Dixon, we didn't control the clock, and thus didn't control the score.
 

Coach34

New member
Jul 20, 2012
20,283
1
0
1. WE didnt "name our score" against Ruston
2. Dixon had trouble running on them...we averaged less than 3 yards a carry as a team
3. Our OL is not very good, Dixon may not get 1,000, much less 1,500
4. I told basically EVERYONE our OL wasnt going to be very good
5. Dixon is an average back...and our OL will make sure of that
6. Backer is almost always wrong, just like Cowbell</p>

7. Woody didnt stop Dixon, Tech did. He had one great run and a bunch of short carries</p>

</p>

you guys want to act like he barely carried the ball...he averaged 22 carries a game last year...he had 18 Sat night...thats only 4 less than his average...get out of Fantasyland and realize they were stuffing our run game</p>
 

pikedawg

New member
Jul 1, 2008
66
0
0
2. If you're going to argue that Dixon did not run well, why not use his stats and not the team's stat. 5 yards a carry seems pretty good to me.</p>
 

bulldogbaja

New member
Dec 18, 2007
2,683
0
0
but it wasn't very good I bet. In fact I bet the whole thing was pretty low.

Coach34 said:
2. Dixon had trouble running on them...we averaged less than 3 yards a carry as a team

</p>

Worst. Argument. Ever.
 

josebrown

Well-known member
Aug 4, 2008
2,191
619
113
I believe Dixon had 7 carries in the second half. That was a coaching decision. He averaged 5 yds per carry as well inspite of our bad oline.
 

Coach34

New member
Jul 20, 2012
20,283
1
0
Dixon had a 31 yard runto get his average that high.. you idiots want to act like he was gashing them and thats not even close to the truth...the rest of his carries average out to 3.5 a carry..17 carries- 60 yards for the rest of the game...we were having trouble running the football

Every time we got in the I, the loaded the box and went to man coverage...expect every other team on our schedule to do the same thing...Its going to be a tough road for our run game in 2008
 

SLUdog

Member
May 28, 2007
2,150
9
38
turnovers beat us...plain and simple. I agree that our Oline was not good. However, we were good enough to win this game. I also agree that our Oline play does not bode well for SEC and Ga Tech.
 

josebrown

Well-known member
Aug 4, 2008
2,191
619
113
We had no more trouble running the ball than we are accostomed to being MState fans. 3.5 a carry outside of big runs is still plenty to have moved the chains Saturday night. 3.5*3plays=10.5yds for you coach. Even better, 3.5*4plays=14yds. Saturday night inspite of a bad oline and LaTech stacking the box we still could have moved the chains.

We threw the ball 40 times in the game, not normal MState fashion. If the coaches had of stuck with Dixon in the second-half I believe we would have won the game. Last years dismal success came from pounding teams on the ground for 4 quarters and taking advantage of their mistakes.

We don't have the D we had last year. Couple that with our weak oline and you are right we will not win 5 games.
 

Coach34

New member
Jul 20, 2012
20,283
1
0
"However, we were good enough to win this game"

1. we should have dominated this game, not just won it
2. We didnt win it because we got out-coached
3. We wont win many others because we will get out-coached
4. The fact that we struggled with this team shows we arent that good- period
 

Croomp

New member
Jun 25, 2008
1,484
0
0
Coach34 said:
Dixon had a 31 yard runto get his average that high.. you idiots want to act like he was gashing them and thats not even close to the truth...the rest of his carries average out to 3.5 a carry..17 carries- 60 yards for the rest of the game...we were having trouble running the football

Every time we got in the I, the loaded the box and went to man coverage...expect every other team on our schedule to do the same thing...Its going to be a tough road for our run game in 2008
your argument is flawed we completely ditched our running game in the 2nd half. We threw more passes than any game last year except for the Arkansas game. How does Croom talk so highly of Dixon in the preseason and then come game time he just airs it out? If you are going to call someone out call them out for something outside of our running game.
 

dawgstudent

Well-known member
Apr 15, 2003
37,381
12,426
113
to take out his long carry to prove your stats. You take the good with the bad. Let me do like you and say if you take out his other 17 runs - he had 1 carry for 31 yds.
 

Coach34

New member
Jul 20, 2012
20,283
1
0
is people wanting to run the ball more when we got 91 yards on 31 carries...we were getting stuffed...

I suppose you would also tale about how dominant a RB would be if he had 105 yards on 10 carries. He has a 90 run on one carry, and then 15 more yards on 9 carries...he averaged 10.5 yards a carry...but him being stuffed 9 out of 10 times doesnt make it a dominant day
 

Coach34

New member
Jul 20, 2012
20,283
1
0
is people wanting to run the ball more when we got 91 yards on 31 carries...we were getting stuffed...

I suppose you would also tale about how dominant a RB would be if he had 105 yards on 10 carries. He has a 90 run on one carry, and then 15 more yards on 9 carries...he averaged 10.5 yards a carry...but him being stuffed 9 out of 10 times doesnt make it a dominant day
 

SLUdog

Member
May 28, 2007
2,150
9
38
however, we moved the ball well. Eliminate the turnovers and we win this game fairly easily. We definitely played a team & coach that was more prepared mentally to play football. We were "outclassed" in special teams. However if we are even on turnovers or plus we win. Believe me I agree with the disappointment over the 4th quarter and we will not win more than 4 games without drastic changes.
 

dawgstudent

Well-known member
Apr 15, 2003
37,381
12,426
113
more than likely got you six. That's a good day.

I think the thing is that if we run, we win the game. Like I have said in previous posts, open up the offense but don't lose the game. And it's Croom's responsibility to figure out that combo at the tune of 1.7 million per season.
 

Coach34

New member
Jul 20, 2012
20,283
1
0
dawgstudent said:
more than likely got you six. That's a good day.

I think the thing is that if we run, we win the game. Like I have said in previous posts, open up the offense but don't lose the game. And it's Croom's responsibility to figure out that combo at the tune of 1.7 million per season.
Dixon carried the ball 7 times in the 3rd quarter for only 27 yards...and we scored no points...and then once the 4th started, we we're down 22-14 when we finally got the ball with under 7 mins left...

Not running Dixon didnt lose this game
 

Big Sheep81

Member
Feb 24, 2008
2,125
52
48
FIVE turnovers and bad special teams play. We lost momentum in the first half with the turnovers and the punt downed on the one followed by the short punt. If you EVER coached a day in your life you would understand this. But then again, a career assitant assitant would never pay attention to what happens during a game.......he is too busy shagging balls for the place kicker........
 

8dog

Well-known member
Feb 23, 2008
12,688
3,734
113
were on our 1 yard line and he got the handoff 6 yards deep in the end zone. He single handedly kept us from getting a safety...and of course the irony is that we would have been better off giving them a safety.
 

8dog

Well-known member
Feb 23, 2008
12,688
3,734
113
that big time running backs and successful running games that avg 4.5-6 yds per carry actually get 4.5-6 yds per carry every single time? Hell no, they all mix in big runs to up the average. And as noted below, we gave the ball to Dixon twice on our own 1. Dixon was running hard and running well despite having no line. I guess we should have kept going with the vertical passing game since that was working so well.

Beanie wells carried 13 times for 111 yards but he had runs of 43 and 25 so if you take out those 2 runs, he averaged about the same thing dixon did in the 2nd half. Good thing he got hurt b/c he really wasn't effective for OSU.

More: At one point tonight, Arian Foster was 8 carries for 42 yds with a long of 22. So on 7 of his carries, he averaged less than 2 yds/carry. Yet they kept giving it to him. What idiots.
 

Coach34

New member
Jul 20, 2012
20,283
1
0
7 carries- 27 yards in the 3rd quarter- no points....he was getting the ball, Tech just adjusted...2 of his carries were on 1st down and they were carries of +2 and -2...keeping us in 2nd and long is not helping the offense and doesnt point to giving it to him more
 

8dog

Well-known member
Feb 23, 2008
12,688
3,734
113
M 1-10 M12 MISSISSIPPI STATE drive start at 13:55.
M 1-10 M12 Wesley Carroll pass complete to Eric Hoskins for 14 yards to the MS26,
1ST DOWN MS (White, B;Jackson, Bra).
M 1-10 M26 Anthony Dixon rush for 4 yards to the MS30 (Jordan, K;Jackson, Bre).
M 2-6 M30 Anthony Dixon rush for 7 yards to the MS37, 1ST DOWN MS (Jackson,
Bre;Jackson, Bra).
M 1-10 M37 Wesley Carroll pass incomplete to Anthony Dixon.
M 2-10 M37 Wesley Carroll pass complete to Co-Eric Riley for 8 yards to the MS45
(Howze, S).
M 3-2 M45 Anthony Dixon rush for 4 yards to the MS49, 1ST DOWN MS (Barron, J).
M 1-10 M49 Wesley Carroll pass incomplete to Jamayel Smith, QB hurry by Brown, W.
M 2-10 M49 Wesley Carroll rush for loss of 2 yards to the MS47 (Barron, J;Darby, N).
M 3-12 M47 Wesley Carroll pass incomplete to Anthony Dixon (Smith, D).
M 4-12 M47 Blake McAdams punt 47 yards to the LATECH6, Beck, P return 13 yards to the
LATECH19 (Aaron Feld;Damein Anderson).

Why in the hell did we throw 3 straight times after Dixon was running so well?

But I agree with you...we did not score in the third quarter. That fact does, in fact, remain.
 
Oct 31, 2006
181
0
16
Don't give me the coach-speak: You can't overcome that many turnovers to a good team like La. Tech...blah, blah, blah, ********.

We punted 7 times. Among our 15 possessions, we had drives of 4, 4, 7, 2, 1 and 5 yards. There is no greater reason to believe that the drives ending in turnovers wouldn't have ultimately ended in punts (but for said t.o.s) than to believe that they would have.

This offense is not good, period.

"But if we hadn't had the turnovers...." Horseshit. The fact that we gave up the ball five times means the offense is bad. It'll find a way to #!*$ up. If not by turnovers, then by something else.
 

RobertF50

New member
Apr 27, 2008
276
0
0
three yards before the first down marker hurt as bad as anything. I don't get all the plays that went to the outside instead of up the middle with Dixon. He has always been better between the tackles and it seems like our coaches forgot about that. In the first half we mixed it up enough to have a 93 yard drive for our first score, but then we went more passing and got out of our element. These are the things that bother me the most. I am a little sad to see so many of our fans go so nuts over one game as well. I do now agree that we need a new O.C. but I wont **** all over my team for everyone of our rivals to see and bask in. The season is still on this weekend and maybe this embarrassment will wake up our team.
 

Eureka Dog

New member
Feb 25, 2008
559
0
0
he abandoned the game plan. Of course, if he'd stuck to the game plan and LaTech had still won, Croom would have been crucified for choosing that option as well.
 

dawgstudent

Well-known member
Apr 15, 2003
37,381
12,426
113
were not on the offense. Regardless, we should be able to overcome them against La Tech.
 

Bulldog Backer

New member
Jul 22, 2007
865
0
0
Coach34 said:
"<span style="font-size: 12pt;">People who have actually "seen" Anthony Dixon so far this year knows he is a different back than last year. He is faster, stronger, and is using his power to run through tackles. Depending on number of carries, he may get 1500+ yards this year and actually get some votes for the Heisman. La Tech is not going to stop him...we control the clock, we control the score. It will be what Croom wants it to be. The center of our offensive line dominates the line of scrimmage. "
</span>

<span style="font-size: 12pt;">

great great stuff</span></p>
...and watched the HD DVR replay of about 3/4 of the game, before the length cut it off: wish I had remembered to record both our game and the program afterward, because the game was so long, my HD DVR only recorded through the 3rd quarter, and the first minute of the forth. I was able to replay certain plays and look at them closer.

Your quote aside, because I have been wrong before, I'd still like to make a number of observations about the game.

1. We had the best athletes and were the superior team, we just made a lot of stupid mistakes.

2. Wes made a couple of bad throws into coverage over the middle, but otherwise played well.

3. Whatever could go wrong did. Derek Pegues would never have tried to make an over the shoulder catch of a punt. Nor would he have attempted to pick it up instead of covering it.

4. Two personal fouls called on us weren't. K.J.'s tackle wasn't a horse collar. He had the player by both the front of his jersey and back of his jersey, and just pulled him down, he didn't jerk him down from behind. Most of the leverage was from the front jersey. The announcers even said so. Zach Smith's hit on the receiver in the same series, wasn't a PF. He hit him with his arms and shoulder, not his helmet. Both those calls in Tech's offensive series led to their go ahead touchdown. Also, Tech was holding us all night, and they were never were called.

5. We are much better than the score indicated, but some "really dumb" things. The possession inside the 1 yard line, which led to the Tech team getting the nice punt return was enabled by stupid play calling. You don't run outside toward the sideline when there are 55 seconds on the clock and Lee should not have slid down...he had the first with an effort. The punt return was also enabled by a nice push in the back by a Tech defensive back on our gunner that pushed him past Livas that wasn't called. The official's calls were homer calls.

6. When Lee was in, Tech blitzed more and covered the outside preventing escape and obstructing his vision to the outside receivers.

7. We deserved to lose. We played sloppy and made too many mistakes.
 
Get unlimited access today.

Pick the right plan for you.

Already a member? Login