Yesterday, Southern Miss eliminated LSU from the NCAA baseball tournament.
Today, Chesa Boudin, San Francisco’s DA, loses the recall election.
Today, Chesa Boudin, San Francisco’s DA, loses the recall election.
Yesterday, Southern Miss eliminated LSU from the NCAA baseball tournament.
Today, Chesa Boudin, San Francisco’s DA, loses the recall election.
“do: make sure people and businesses would live in and invest in it.”
I hope everyone would like this for their city. Progressives, conservatives, establishment or not.
But here we are.
It is wild to see people like Boudin. I get pretty much every political bent. I think a lot of them are stupid and detached from reality, but I at least understand the goal. I don't get the let it burn types that come from privilege.
I mean, does this look like the kind of guy that is going to do well if he is successful at making compliance with laws basically optional?
ETA: Well, the picture doesn't show up for whatever reason. But just google the guy. He's not the kind of guy that muggers are going to shy away from.
It's not that hard to figure. They were fed up with the last guy/regime, and he promised them they could have their cake (humane treatment of criminals) and eat it too (safety). He didn't deliver, and they kicked him out.
The story of San Fran is moral hazard and a little of the fallacy of composition. SF has had drug addicts and petty criminals flood in because of the "humane" way they treat them. They forgot you have to discourage undesired behavior, even of you understand why it happened and don't want to punish those people, else you encourage that behavior and it will increase.
That's the million-dollar question for anyone who is soft on crime. It's either ignorance of the risks (i.e. they have an idealized view of the world that simply is not reality), or they are being paid. Or both.No, I get why people voted for him. He said nice things and didn't explain that he was essentially going to decriminalize shoplifting and also go extremely easy on even violent crime. Lots of voters vote for stupid unrealistic stuff. That's why we have communists and socialist politicians.
I mean I don't get him individually (or several other of the prosecutors Soros invested in). Unless he was paid to help turn more parts of SF into a ********, what does he get out of it? If he's successful, he's not going to do well. I guess maybe they understand they won't ever be successful enough that they'll be subjected to the consequences?
That's the million-dollar question for anyone who is soft on crime. It's either ignorance of the risks (i.e. they have an idealized view of the world that simply is not reality), or they are being paid. Or both.
Of course that begs the question of who would pay someone to encourage softness on crime. I personally think some people would rather be lord of the slums rather than live in a safer area without their power. Of course, they'll change their stance the first time they get pistol-whipped on the subway.
No, I get why people voted for him. He said nice things and didn't explain that he was essentially going to decriminalize shoplifting and also go extremely easy on even violent crime. Lots of voters vote for stupid unrealistic stuff. That's why we have communists and socialist politicians.
I mean I don't get him individually (or several other of the prosecutors Soros invested in). Unless he was paid to help turn more parts of SF into a ********, what does he get out of it? If he's successful, he's not going to do well. I guess maybe they understand they won't ever be successful enough that they'll be subjected to the consequences?
A powerful bloc of voters led by Asians and affluent white residents drove support for Tuesday’s recall of District Attorney Chesa Boudin, according to election day results by voting precinct. The anti-recall campaign, by contrast, failed to make inroads beyond the city’s progressive strongholds.
The latest data available shows Proposition H, the ballot measure, passing by about 60-40 citywide. That’s a clear majority, but support was hardly uniform across SF. Neighborhoods where support for the recall exceeded 80% included precincts in the Marina, Visitacion Valley and around Lake Merced. Put together, it tells a story of a recall support coalition between affluent, whiter neighborhoods and Asians from across the economic spectrum.
Yeah, the left is the only side with idiots. [Eyeroll] how's that Wall coming on significantly changing illegal immigration?
I would guess he thinks those that commit petty crime are desperate, and just letting them go rather than making things worse for them via charges and jail will allow them to climb out of their desperation and not commit more crime. It's a view if people being inherently good, and it is by no means limited to the left. It's the same reason righties promote charity to solve deep problems, or self regulation, among other obviously wrong headed beliefs that they cling to.
Where did anybody say there were only idiots on teh left?
This is just a particular type of idiot that is beyond anything else I can think of on the left or right. This isn't believing that we are on the right hand side of the lauffer curve or that you can pay for utopia by taxing 1% of the country or that you can erase the deficit by eliminating foreign aid or that the social securitiy "trust fund" actually is a resource for the gov't to draw on or that the world would be better with fewer people or that we will be better off without cheap energy. Those are stupid, but they don't have the obvious and immediate repercussions. And this isn't just overly idealistic thinking as far as what can be accomplished with methods other than incarceration. It's' just "17 it; no more property crime; no going to jail before trial unless you kill somebody, and maybe not even then" and then watching it burn. These are largely the same people who think that rich people and corporations are evil, so it's not like they just think human nature is to be good and laws are the problem in general.
Looks like the wealthier folks and Asian community voted for the recall.
From the San Francisco Standard: Link.
Really good article from someone who lived it: https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2022/06/how-san-francisco-became-failed-city/661199/
Smoked Toag said:That's the million-dollar question for anyone who is soft on crime. It's either ignorance of the risks (i.e. they have an idealized view of the world that simply is not reality), or they are being paid. Or both.
Of course that begs the question of who would pay someone to encourage softness on crime. I personally think some people would rather be lord of the slums rather than live in a safer area without their power. Of course, they'll change their stance the first time they get pistol-whipped on the subway.
I don't know, I think it kinda is. Righties promote charities to virtue signal and have parties. Most conservative people know that it's a 17'ed up world, that's why they want guns/police/etc. to protect themselves. I think what the right believes about people being "inherently good", is the idea that people in this country can get a job and make money, thus bettering themselves. I do happen to believe that way myself. Matter of fact, I think it's one of the fundamental differences in the left and right.Yeah, the left is the only side with idiots. [Eyeroll] how's that Wall coming on significantly changing illegal immigration?
I would guess he thinks those that commit petty crime are desperate, and just letting them go rather than making things worse for them via charges and jail will allow them to climb out of their desperation and not commit more crime. It's a view if people being inherently good, and it is by no means limited to the left. It's the same reason righties promote charity to solve deep problems, or self regulation, among other obviously wrong headed beliefs that they cling to.
Residents had hoped Boudin would reform the criminal-justice system and treat low-level offenders more humanely. Instead, critics argued that his policies victimized victims, allowed criminals to go free to reoffend, and did nothing to help the city’s most vulnerable. To understand just how noteworthy Boudin’s defenestration is, please keep in mind that San Francisco has only a tiny number of Republicans. This fight is about leftists versus liberals. It’s about idealists who think a perfect world is within reach—it’ll only take a little more time, a little more commitment, a little more funding, forever—and those who are fed up.
Read that yesterday. It was a really good article.
Her wife, Bari Weiss, runs the podcast Honestly. And it's been on my rotation for several months now. Really good stuff from her. Bari quit the NYTimes because of how woke it had become. There's a lot of liberals who are tired of the progressive nonsense.
It might not be limited to the left but it’s a lot more prevalent on the left and they are doing more damage because of it.
People are actually inherently bad. It’s human nature to be lazy and take the easy way. Give people that option and they will do it. And they will suffer.
I don't know, I think it kinda is. Righties promote charities to virtue signal and have parties. Most conservative people know that it's a 17'ed up world, that's why they want guns/police/etc. to protect themselves. I think what the right believes about people being "inherently good", is the idea that people in this country can get a job and make money, thus bettering themselves. I do happen to believe that way myself. Matter of fact, I think it's one of the fundamental differences in the left and right.
I mean, I complain about gas prices, groceries, etc., but I could go get a second job instead of coaching baseball, and that problem goes away.
Idealism certainly has it's flaws. Like any weakness there is a back sided strength. If everyone were pragmatic like me, we'd have fewer discoveries and less progress because we'd stick more to the known and not try things that "don't work". That being said, having a prosecutor who isn't interested in prosecuting law breakers is a big issue. Jackson suffers, only on a smaller scale, in much the same way, albeit not an openly stated position, just an unfortunate reality. <-I think I hate the construct of that last sentence but I'm not changing it...
I thought that Atlantic article seemed off, too quick to tar an entire side with what some rando said at a school board meeting for example, and it's perfectly explained by being written by the wife of Bari Weiss.
https://theintercept.com/2017/08/31...failings-and-its-lack-of-viewpoint-diversity/
too quick to tar an entire side with what some rando said at a school board meeting for example
What can I say, man, I just totally disagree when it comes to the left. I don't disagree with all you say regarding the right, I'll say that. But one side can't be invincible. I think jealousy/envy are one big tenant/motivator of the left.Well, on the right it's more of THOSE people are inherently bad, MY people are inherently good. Those people are lazy, but my people will step up and feed them by charity, thus we don't need welfare (my money going to those people). Those people need strict policing, but my people (corps, cops, etc) can self-regulate. (Yes, race plays into this, but it's hardly just that. Racism can't explain persistent resistance to business regulation. Religion too, those people aren't saved so aren't inherently good, my people are saved so they're inherently good.)
Eta: people are inherently good, so let them decide how to spend welfare money, they'll make better decisions than the govt.
I think the biggest problem the would-be reformers have is there's no real alternative to our crappy prison system. It's right to say it's dumb to send petty criminals to gang-run prison hellholes, but Boidin found out what else are you gonna do?
Agree, only people born and raised in the first world can have the viewpoint that people aren't inherently bad. We really, really are. And it doesn't take long to stoke that chaos, even in the first world. Exhibit A - COVID.Interesting take. It is in conflict with a Christian worldview, which is fine, but when I look around at the atrocities in the world it certainly seems to me that we have a huge capacity to do bad and have to be trained to do good. Of course settling on a solid definition of bad/good is not without its own issues. Regardless, I had to teach my kids not to be selfish, which included: not lying, not taking things that weren't theirs, sharing things that were theirs, not hurting others to get what they want, etc. They came into this world dead set on doing all the bad things and had to learn to be good.
What can I say, man, I just totally disagree when it comes to the left. I don't disagree with all you say regarding the right, I'll say that. But one side can't be invincible. I think jealousy/envy are one big tenant/motivator of the left.