MSUCostanza said:You realize that Stansbury was Williams' top assistant and associate head coach when we went to the Final Four, right?
For anyone that wants to consider the statistics for themselves:Coach34 said:Brady won 2 SEC titles and went to a Sweet 16 and a Final Four- LSU won 3 titles to our 1 and 2 Tourney's from 2000-2009- we may be good in the SEC West- but that is about all. LSU would have to be the top West team from 2000-20009
on the belief that Larry Templeton sucks. Even without critical thinking, that almost guarantees him being right half of the time.Ol Blue said:dawgstudent said:I am asking a question. I thought he was playing well today and was curious as to why he sat for a lot of the 2nd half.
Even with a football win, I will point out things we can improve on.
Dawgbreeze knows two things about sports. He knows how to throw players under the bus and he knows Larry Templeton sucks. He is not capable of critical thinking.
This is the best argument ever for keeping Stansbury (if you needed something other than his performance so far). If Brady can take a team to the Final 4, it really is just a matter of time until Stans gets lucky. Same thing can be said about Gottfried. Both enjoyed tourney runs better than Stansbury, and whatever limitations you think Stansbury has, I don't think anyone has made the argument (i hope) that either Brady or Gottfried is better at coaching than Stansbury.Coach34 said:Dawgbreeze said:B. Brady won 2 SEC titles and went to a Sweet 16 and a Final Four- LSU won 3 titles to our 1 and 2 Tourney's from 2000-2009- we may be good in the SEC West- but that is about all. LSU would have to be the top West team from 2000-20009...Acting like Stansbury has our program on some pedastal is ridiculous.
C. Stansbury is consistent- thats his best quality....we will never be awful under him, and we will never be great...Stansbury = Cutcliffe
Hilarious.Johnson85 said:This is the best argument ever for keeping Stansbury (if you needed something other than his performance so far). If Brady can take a team to the Final 4, it really is just a matter of time until Stans gets lucky. Same thing can be said about Gottfried. Both enjoyed tourney runs better than Stansbury, and whatever limitations you think Stansbury has, <span style="font-weight: bold;">I don't think anyone has made the argument (i hope) that either Brady or Gottfried is better at coaching than Stansbury.</span>Coach34 said:Dawgbreeze said:B. Brady won 2 SEC titles and went to a Sweet 16 and a Final Four- LSU won 3 titles to our 1 and 2 Tourney's from 2000-2009- we may be good in the SEC West- but that is about all. LSU would have to be the top West team from 2000-20009...Acting like Stansbury has our program on some pedastal is ridiculous.
C. Stansbury is consistent- thats his best quality....we will never be awful under him, and we will never be great...Stansbury = Cutcliffe
I take it this means I am wrong and that people think Brady and/or Gottfried are actually better coaches than Stansbury, and not coaches with teams that got hot?Dawg in a pile said:Hilarious.Johnson85 said:This is the best argument ever for keeping Stansbury (if you needed something other than his performance so far). If Brady can take a team to the Final 4, it really is just a matter of time until Stans gets lucky. Same thing can be said about Gottfried. Both enjoyed tourney runs better than Stansbury, and whatever limitations you think Stansbury has, <span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">I don't think anyone has made the argument (i hope) that either Brady or Gottfried is better at coaching than Stansbury.</span>
If by people you mean one raving psychopath, then yes.Johnson85 said:I take it this means I am wrong and that people think Brady and/or Gottfried are actually better coaches than Stansbury, and not coaches with teams that got hot?Dawg in a pile said:Hilarious.Johnson85 said:This is the best argument ever for keeping Stansbury (if you needed something other than his performance so far). If Brady can take a team to the Final 4, it really is just a matter of time until Stans gets lucky. Same thing can be said about Gottfried. Both enjoyed tourney runs better than Stansbury, and whatever limitations you think Stansbury has, <span style="font-weight: bold;">I don't think anyone has made the argument (i hope) that either Brady or Gottfried is better at coaching than Stansbury.</span>