USC working on 7-figure NIL deal for Dylan Stewart

18IsTheMan

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2022
13,073
11,161
113
Getting ahead of it I guess.

I hate that this is what college football has become. Even our own folks know he doesn't give a crap about USC and would likely happily go play elsewhere next year if the money made enough sense to him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PrestonyteParrot

18IsTheMan

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2022
13,073
11,161
113
Just go ahead and fold the power 4 into the NFL.

A question becomes, how many can we afford? If Stewart gets a $1-1.5 million deal. Sellers "people" will surely think he's deserving of something comparable. And that sets the bar for any other big time recruits we get.

It eventually becomes analogous to the big market/small market team issue in pro sports. Here you're not talking about market size but booster support. We certainly lag woefully behind teams like Bama, UGA, Texas, Oregon, etc. We just don't have, and never will have, the kind of money those teams do.

Once you get into buying quality players. How many can we afford at one time?
 

RUMMENIGGE

Active member
Jan 31, 2022
651
403
63
Getting ahead of it I guess.

I hate that this is what college football has become. Even our own folks know he doesn't give a crap about USC and would likely happily go play elsewhere next year if the money made enough sense to him.
I hate that this kind of information goes public. This could cause a few players to transfer out of South Carolina looking for their million dollars.

On a different note Gilber Edmond Likely is glad he returned to Columbia instead being part of a one win Seminoles team.
 

18IsTheMan

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2022
13,073
11,161
113
I hate that this kind of information goes public. This could cause a few players to transfer out of South Carolina looking for their million dollars.

On a different note Gilber Edmond Likely is glad he returned to Columbia instead being part of a one win Seminoles team.

That's the other factor. Once you start investing this kind of money in one player, every other player who had played reasonably well starts to wonder about their payday.

And it's human nature for any athlete to think they're value is more than it is.
 

LonghornsGamecocks

Active member
Feb 24, 2024
437
408
63
Getting ahead of it I guess.

I hate that this is what college football has become. Even our own folks know he doesn't give a crap about USC and would likely happily go play elsewhere next year if the money made enough sense to him.
It doesn't mean he doesn't give a crap about us. It just means he has a market value and he should get paid what he's worth while he can. I like my employer but I'll go somewhere else to maximize my comp in a heartbeat.
 

18IsTheMan

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2022
13,073
11,161
113
It doesn't mean he doesn't give a crap about us. It just means he has a market value and he should get paid what he's worth while he can. I like my employer but I'll go somewhere else to maximize my comp in a heartbeat.

It really does, though.

If you'll leave one place for another place for more money, then you really don't give a crap about the place you currently are. You might like it there. Might even be happy and like the people. But if you can drop it and leave for money, then you didn't really care about the first place. The Bible say "Where your treasure is, there will your heart be". If your treasure is money, then your heart goes where the money goes.

As it is here, with modern players their treasure is market value, so their heart is with whoever says they have the higher market value.
 

will110

Joined Aug 17, 2018
Jan 20, 2022
8,972
23,883
113
It really does, though.

If you'll leave one place for another place for more money, then you really don't give a crap about the place you currently are. You might like it there. Might even be happy and like the people. But if you can drop it and leave for money, then you didn't really care about the first place. The Bible say "Where your treasure is, there will your heart be". If your treasure is money, then your heart goes where the money goes.

As it is here, with modern players their treasure is market value, so their heart is with whoever says they have the higher market value.
Ehhh while I agree in theory, in practice this just isn't really reasonable. If USC offers Stewart $1.5 million and Alabama offers him $1.7 million and he leaves, then yeah he didn't give a crap about us. But if USC offers Stewart $50,000 and Tennessee offers him $2.5 million, only a fool would turn that down. It's life changing money.

The system sucks.
 

3USC1801

Joined Dec 10, 2020
Jan 17, 2022
830
3,056
93
Ehhh while I agree in theory, in practice this just isn't really reasonable. If USC offers Stewart $1.5 million and Alabama offers him $1.7 million and he leaves, then yeah he didn't give a crap about us. But if USC offers Stewart $50,000 and Tennessee offers him $2.5 million, only a fool would turn that down. It's life changing money.

The system sucks.
Not trying to argue but in reality, there isn’t a system or governing body. It’s a free-for-all with limited guidelines or restrictions. The few regulations in place do not level the playing field. In fact, it’s a situation where the rich programs have gained even a stronger hold on recruiting.

And, if Stewart were offered $200,000 more at Alabama, most would agree he’d be foolish not to take it. Why wouldn’t he? There isn’t any loyalty to a university anyway. That’s all in the past now. As fans, we are delusional if we think a highly sought after player is loyal to the team. The only way to overcome this mess is for universities/conferences to set contractual obligations and serious restrictions, including cap limitations.
 

PrestonyteParrot

Well-known member
May 28, 2024
873
844
93
It's actually not a "system" at all. It's an environment.
Somehow, we have turned a free college education and all the associated perks into victimhood requiring retribution.
Might as well turn CFB over to the NFL for funding and make it professional football.
NFL teams can adopt their chosen college teams and maybe at least bring some stability to college rosters with binding contracts.
 

18IsTheMan

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2022
13,073
11,161
113
Ehhh while I agree in theory, in practice this just isn't really reasonable. If USC offers Stewart $1.5 million and Alabama offers him $1.7 million and he leaves, then yeah he didn't give a crap about us. But if USC offers Stewart $50,000 and Tennessee offers him $2.5 million, only a fool would turn that down. It's life changing money.

The system sucks.

If you leave one place for another place for more money, even a lot more money then that means you don't care that much about the place you're leaving. You care about money. This is how professional athletics work, where we know there is no loyalty. If you actually care about the place you are, you don't look around for options. If the place where you are is expendable to you, you don't REALLY care about it.
 

3USC1801

Joined Dec 10, 2020
Jan 17, 2022
830
3,056
93
Somehow, we have turned a free college education and all the associated perks into victimhood requiring retribution.
Isn’t that the truth?!!!

But the can of worms has been opened and the only way forward is to either have professional players (junior NFL) or purely amateur conferences.
 

Harvard Gamecock

Well-known member
Jan 20, 2022
1,971
1,907
113
This could be presumptive, but the headline read, "expected to command", doesn't necessarily mean he would get that amount.
 

Attachments

  • 1731008068250.png
    1731008068250.png
    1.6 MB · Views: 1

The Reel Ess

Joined Feb 3, 2005
Jan 31, 2022
1,458
1,821
113
Somehow, we have turned a free college education and all the associated perks into victimhood requiring retribution.
Might as well turn CFB over to the NFL for funding and make it professional football.
NFL teams can adopt their chosen college teams and maybe at least bring some stability to college rosters with binding contracts.
We've turned everyone into a victim. Everyone goes to work in what can best be described as an equal exchange of money for services rendered and the great majority feel they got the short end of that stick. They did not because they did it voluntarily. That said, it's only natural for a real performer to what what other real performers get.

I seem to recall the HBC was in favor of this. I don't think he foresaw it going this far.
 

KingWard

Well-known member
Feb 15, 2022
6,247
6,579
113
It's a market that willfully pays for value, whether real or perceived. Very few regulations. Sounds like archetypal American capitalism to me.
Well, it's certainly unregulated but I think it needs to be. College athletics now should (sadly) adopt the professional model.

Meantime, I am in agreement with @RUMMENIGGE 's point. In this unsettled landscape, there's nothing to be gained on the school's part by the premature disclosure of this pending transaction.

I would also say that, at this stage of the game, the conferred value, in many cases, will turn out to be more than the realized value. Schools can't afford the same mistakes NFL teams make.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: LonghornsGamecocks

ThinnyJ

Member
Sep 16, 2023
63
47
18
It really does, though.

If you'll leave one place for another place for more money, then you really don't give a crap about the place you currently are. You might like it there. Might even be happy and like the people. But if you can drop it and leave for money, then you didn't really care about the first place. The Bible say "Where your treasure is, there will your heart be". If your treasure is money, then your heart goes where the money goes.

As it is here, with modern players their treasure is market value, so their heart is with whoever says they have the higher market value.
I agree with most of this.... I hate working with people at the hospital that have jumped around from place to place just to make an extra 25¢ an hour. They're just not invested, and generally, are the more lazy workers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 18IsTheMan

HI Cock1

Joined Oct 14, 2012
Jan 22, 2022
1,276
2,080
113
There absolutely needs to be a cap. And do away with the idea that this is for NIL. Name, Image, Likeness was all about video games making $millions using the likeness of college kids who weren't being paid (above the table).

We need to call it what it is - pay to play. Make them sign contracts, make them employees. Things will change, but we've got several more years of this crap. It's worse than the pro game because you can just leave if you don't like it - no matter how much you already got paid.
 
Last edited:

adcoop

Well-known member
Jul 3, 2023
752
923
93
If you leave one place for another place for more money, even a lot more money then that means you don't care that much about the place you're leaving. You care about money. This is how professional athletics work, where we know there is no loyalty. If you actually care about the place you are, you don't look around for options. If the place where you are is expendable to you, you don't REALLY care about it.
That is not necessarily true. Sometimes, you are in a place where options find you. You don't have to be looking around. It's the "Pretty Girl" syndrome. The "Pretty Girl" usually doesn't have to look around for dates.
 

adcoop

Well-known member
Jul 3, 2023
752
923
93
I don't understand the victimhood argument. What do you mean by that?
I will attempt to explain. ...to not be eternally grateful for something that really doesn't represent market value anymore is being a victim. I have a totally opposite view from that line of thinking. If you sit there and just accept what someone gave you because that was the market at the beginning of your relationship, at some point you become a victim. I have been a lawyer for 32 years now, so I guess I am the litigious sort that is used to a fight.
 
Last edited:

FootballLVR

Member
Sep 25, 2023
313
197
43
A question becomes, how many can we afford? If Stewart gets a $1-1.5 million deal. Sellers "people" will surely think he's deserving of something comparable. And that sets the bar for any other big time recruits we get.

It eventually becomes analogous to the big market/small market team issue in pro sports. Here you're not talking about market size but booster support. We certainly lag woefully behind teams like Bama, UGA, Texas, Oregon, etc. We just don't have, and never will have, the kind of money those teams do.

Once you get into buying quality players. How many can we afford at one time?
I've heard for years that we have SEC money. It shouldn't be a big deal (unless we spend too much on equestrian or women's basketball).
 

BigJC

Active member
Aug 5, 2022
271
287
63
I will attempt to explain. ...to not be eternally grateful for something that really doesn't represent market value anymore is being a victim. I have a totally opposite view from that line of thinking. If you sit there and just accept what someone gave you because that was the market at the beginning of your relationship, at some point you become a victim. I have been a lawyer for 32 years now, so I guess I am the litigious sort that is used to a fight.
I don't think that makes someone a victim, it makes them either stupid or too lazy to seek higher pay for their services. If I pay someone $10 an hour to do a job that someone else would pay them $20 an hour to do, they are in no way a victim if they are free to leave me and go to work for the other person and they decide to stay with me.
 

18IsTheMan

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2022
13,073
11,161
113
That is not necessarily true. Sometimes, you are in a place where options find you. You don't have to be looking around. It's the "Pretty Girl" syndrome. The "Pretty Girl" usually doesn't have to look around for dates.
I am not necessarily saying he is objectively right or wrong if he we’re to leave for more money. Simply that it shows you you don’t really care about the place you left.
 

LonghornsGamecocks

Active member
Feb 24, 2024
437
408
63
I will attempt to explain. ...to not be eternally grateful for something that really doesn't represent market value anymore is being a victim. I have a totally opposite view from that line of thinking. If you sit there and just accept what someone gave you because that was the market at the beginning of your relationship, at some point you become a victim. I have been a lawyer for 32 years now, so I guess I am the litigious sort that is used to a fight.
I don't understand the totality of your expressed point of view, but in regards to "If you sit there and just accept what someone gave you because that was the market at the beginning of your relationship, at some point you become a victim," I kind of sort of agree with this, if it's in the context of, "if you accept today what was market at some past point in time, yes you're a victim - a victim of your own decision to make that acceptance."

Zooming way out, college athletes now have legal agency to participate materially monetarily in the value they create. Previously, they were excluded from participating in that value by policy and collusion, with all benefits accruing to universities, coaches, media companies, and the rest of the ecosystem - everyone but the players playing the games which people pay to watch. I don't see any element of the players' multi-decade effort to participate in this economy in a more market rate manner related to victimhood. I think of it as capitalism and commanding remuneration for value created.
 

KingWard

Well-known member
Feb 15, 2022
6,247
6,579
113
I am not necessarily saying he is objectively right or wrong if he we’re to leave for more money. Simply that it shows you you don’t really care about the place you left.
Well, there's not much use bringing "care" into it anymore. Money has taken over the the conversation.
 
Get unlimited access today.

Pick the right plan for you.

Already a member? Login