than MSU and are currently going to a bowl game in their coach's first year
<span style="font-weight: bold;">They are losing alot of what got them there, namely Todd and Tate.</span>
McCalebb and Fannin >> than what you have returning at RB.
<span style="font-weight: bold;">You probably right here, for now anyways. Our guys are definitely unproven but have the potential, were highly rated, etc.</span> <span style="font-weight: bold;">But I didn't see much from those two down the stretch. They carried alot of the load early but it seemed they relied on Tate the most, much like we did Dixon.</span>
Their WR are <span style="font-weight: bold;">equal</span> to if not better than what you have returning, especially considering Fannin is as much a WR as RB. Darvin Adams had 10 TDs and was a sophomore.
<span style="font-weight: bold;">You said it, right on. I don't see much difference in the two.</span> <span style="font-weight: bold;">Berry and Bumphis are as good as those guys you mentioned.</span>
On the OL they have two All-Conference players both returning and will be seniors (Ziemba, Coaches 2nd team, Pugh, AP 2nd team).
<span style="font-weight: bold;">We've got an entire offensive line returning also. One that devastated your land sharks.</span>
On top of that, he would at least have a LITTLE competition at MSU for the starting position...at AU, there really is no competition at all, now that Todd is gone.
<span style="font-weight: bold;">This bodes better for MSU's position as a program, but certainly not part of the "supporting cast". Either way, this isn't an issue regarding the question at hand.</span>
