Transitive property. Mark it down. We beat UK by 25. UK beat Ole Miss by 3. Add 3 points since it's a home game for us. 25+3+3 = 31.
The logic is infallible.
The logic is infallible.
Transitive property. Mark it down. We beat UK by 25. UK beat Ole Miss by 3. Add 3 points since it's a home game for us. 25+3+3 = 31.
The logic is infallible.
This is our new reality.We're better than UGA too, by this logic. And maybe even Bama.
The other usc would get bragging rights vs us thoughWe're better than UGA too, by this logic. And maybe even Bama.
But, the refs hate us.We're better than UGA too, by this logic. And maybe even Bama.
Probably. But still, sadly, more talented.Ole Miss are pu$$ie$. It jumps out at you.
WE WANT BAMA!We're better than UGA too, by this logic. And maybe even Bama.
Ole Miss are pu$$ie$. It jumps out at you.
Which nullifies what we did at UK, which was push them around prior to them pushing Ole Miss around prior to Ole Miss pushing us around. Basically, we coached our way out of winning this ballgame with two weeks to prepare. Our coach is a pu$$y, but I'm still in favor of giving him a lifetime deal. We'll never make our mark in college football the conventional way. We might as well go with something unconventional and unprecedented.They looked like anything but pu$$ie$ against us. They were pushing us around like insignificant particles of dust.
Which nullifies what we did at UK, which was push them around prior to them pushing Ole Miss around prior to Ole Miss pushing us around. Basically, we coached our way out of winning this ballgame with two weeks to prepare. Our coach is a pu$$y, but I'm still in favor of giving him a lifetime deal. We'll never make our mark in college football the conventional way. We might as well go with something unconventional and unprecedented.
No hot seat; tenure. Lifetime deal rolled over annually with no raises where there is no progress; strictly incentivized package but open-ended. We'll revolutionize the coaching paradigm.I don't disagree with your strategy (I have previously argued on here for a 10 year deal). What I WOULD disagree with is bringing him back next year to be on the hot seat. Why even bother? Just fire him this year if that's the case. Statistically, how many guys have survived a Year 5 hot seat? To me, that would be a total waste of time. Unless we're making a long-term commitment and if this year continues on it's current trajectory, then cut bait this year.
No hot seat; tenure. Lifetime deal rolled over annually with no raises where there is no progress; strictly incentivized package but open-ended. We'll revolutionize the coaching paradigm.