We are so much worse than anyone else in the…

Trojanbulldog19

Well-known member
Aug 25, 2014
8,868
4,356
113
Yeah we picked a terrible time to suck. We are truly cursed. Death of a good coach. And piss poor leadership in that time lead to bad decisions to trust the wrong people with the program. We are paying the dividends and while lebby may turn out to be a good coach. Getting a greenhorn means growing pains and lot of first time mistakes which you pay for dearly in this league. You don't get training wheels in the sec or many other power 4 jobs anymore
 

uptowndawg

Well-known member
Jul 15, 2010
2,179
886
113
It only took Lea 3 years to exceed expectations in his 4th year (even if he loses out). You just gotta hire the right guy and give him 4 years. Only problem is it’s a dice roll on who the right guy is, just look at all the bigger programs striking out on the bigger names. And if you lost that dice roll 4 years ago and want to cut bait and try again then you’re just stuck rolling the dice again.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Trojanbulldog19

Called3rdstrikedawg

Well-known member
May 7, 2016
754
728
93
Let's talk about the Indiana Head Coach. Wasn't he a sitting head coach somewhere else last year?

Let's talk about Jed Fisch. Didn't he turn Arizona around from a 1 win team and parlayed it to the Washington Job?

How about the guy at Arizona State now. Sitting at 5-1 after only winning 3 last year. Where was he a coach at 2 years ago?

Are there ANY new Head Coaches this year having success that were Head Coaches somewhere else last year? Or are only Coordinators turned HC this year the success stories I realize it took the Missouri Coach a couple of years to get it going in Columbia. And Freeze sucks at Auburn after having success at Liberty. But why is it State needed to hire a coordinator an take 4 years to possible have the success "Vanderbilt" is having? Vanderfreakingbilt!!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: LimaoCabeca
Oct 7, 2022
156
158
43
Let's talk about the Indiana Head Coach. Wasn't he a sitting head coach somewhere else last year?

Let's talk about Jed Fisch. Didn't he turn Arizona around from a 1 win team and parlayed it to the Washington Job?

How about the guy at Arizona State now. Sitting at 5-1 after only winning 3 last year. Where was he a coach at 2 years ago?

Are there ANY new Head Coaches this year having success that were Head Coaches somewhere else last year? Or are only Coordinators turned HC this year the success stories I realize it took the Missouri Coach a couple of years to get it going in Columbia. And Freeze sucks at Auburn after having success at Liberty. But why is it State needed to hire a coordinator a take 4 years to possible have the success "Vanderbilt" is having? Vanderfreakingbilt!!!
Drinkwitz was HC at App st before he went to Columbia. FYI.
 

Baddog11

Well-known member
Aug 28, 2013
1,082
867
113
Mike Elko success in year one every where he’s been. Don’t give me the need 4 years bull cral.
 

The Peeper

Well-known member
Feb 26, 2008
12,085
5,296
113
It only took Lea 3 years to exceed expectations in his 4th year (even if he loses out). You just gotta hire the right guy and give him 4 years. Only problem is it’s a dice roll on who the right guy is, just look at all the bigger programs striking out on the bigger names. And if you lost that dice roll 4 years ago and want to cut bait and try again then you’re just stuck rolling the dice again.
4 years to get it right fell by the wayside with the advent of multi year contracts and NIL. There is no more team development period to win, you MAY get 3 years max. First year you gotta do better than the last guy and I don't mean 1 win better. 2nd year you show significant improvement. Year 3 if you backslide in this era that you can import and export players like Chinese trinkets, you are on thin ice with a short leash (or noose) pulled tight around your neck. You can tell your grandkids about that 4 year rule when y'all are discussing history and the good old days
 

mcfly.sixpack

Member
Mar 21, 2009
327
92
28
Comparing ourselves to the other schools in the conference, we dont look like the rest. We don’t physically have the build of a sec roster. On the offensive and defensive lines there is a dramatic “look” difference from us and everyone else. And that’s where we have to focus our recruiting and NIL efforts. It’s cliche but the SEC is still won on the line of scrimmage and we “look” closer to USM than anyone on our schedule.
 
  • Sad
Reactions: Noname.sixpack
Get unlimited access today.

Pick the right plan for you.

Already a member? Login