I'm guessing he transfers at the end of the year. I'm glad we're up right now, but I still think he needs more minutes. I say play him at the 3 with Augustus at the 4.
He doesn't split with Benock, he splits with Ravern. Ravern only plays the 3 which is where Romero plays all his minutes barring foul trouble by Kodi. I'm not sure why Ravern played so many minutes tonight (37), but its not like Romero is splitting with a scrub. It will be tough for Romero to ever get big minutes with Ravern ahead of him.Thick said:Recruited highly and had major offers, and he doesn't get the minutes with us. I could understand if he would have signed with Kansas, but us. I mean we have alot of 3 stars on this team, and RO was a legit 4 star! Don't know who is responsible for subs, but they are screwing him to death.
<font><font size="-1">Opponent Date GS Min FG-FGA Pct 3FG-FGA Pct FT-FTA Pct Off Def Tot Avg PF FO A TO Blk Stl Pts Avg ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ RIDER 11-13-09 11 2-3 .667 0-0 .000 0-0 .000 1 2 3 3.0 1 0 0 1 1 0 4 4.0 SE LOUISIANA 11-19-09 13 2-5 .400 1-2 .500 0-0 .000 2 2 4 3.5 1 0 1 2 0 0 5 4.5 BETHUNE-COOKMAN 11-21-09 24 2-6 .333 0-2 .000 3-4 .750 1 5 6 4.3 1 0 3 1 2 0 7 5.3 TEXAS-PAN AMERICAN 11-24-09 15 3-6 .500 1-2 .500 1-1 1.000 1 1 2 3.8 1 0 2 1 0 0 8 6.0 vs Richmond 11-27-09 8 1-1 1.000 0-0 .000 2-4 .500 1 0 1 3.2 1 0 0 1 0 0 4 5.6 vs Old Dominion 11-28-09 14 0-1 .000 0-0 .000 1-2 .500 0 1 1 2.8 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 4.8 ST. BONAVENTURE 12-05-09 17 2-3 .667 0-0 .000 1-3 .333 1 4 5 3.1 1 0 0 3 1 2 5 4.9 vs DePaul 12-10-09 17 4-9 .444 1-3 .333 4-4 1.000 2 5 7 3.6 0 0 1 0 0 0 13 5.9 vs UCLA 12-12-09 8 1-1 1.000 0-0 .000 0-0 .000 0 2 2 3.4 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 5.4 WRIGHT STATE 12-16-09 9 4-4 1.000 2-2 1.000 0-0 .000 0 2 2 3.3 0 0 0 4 1 0 10 5.9 at Houston 12-16-09 2 0-0 .000 0-0 .000 0-0 .000 0 1 1 3.1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 5.4 vs Centenary 12-22-09 17 3-5 .600 2-3 .667 0-0 .000 1 1 2 3.0 2 0 0 0 0 0 8 5.6 Totals......................... 0 155 24-44 .545 7-14 .500 12-18 .667 10 26 36 3.0 11 0 7 17 5 2 67 5.6 </font></font>
Yeah, cuz there wasnt any discussion of substitution patterns last year during the second half of the season concerning Augustus.whatever said:On another note, notice how we always complain about substitution patterns early in the year when Stans is trying things out but you don't hear much about it later in the year???
Seems like we're starting to play the Bost/Turner/Johnson/Augustus/Varnado combination more while Stewart is on the bench, which is a combo that a lot of us would like to see. I'm liking the substitution patterns lately
Well he needs to start playing like he deserved all those offers. Only then will he get the minutes.Thick said:Recruited highly and had major offers, and he doesn't get the minutes with us. I could understand if he would have signed with Kansas, but us. I mean we have alot of 3 stars on this team, and RO was a legit 4 star! Don't know who is responsible for subs, but they are screwing him to death.
I doubt the line sub around the 12 minute mark is designed to "trick" anyone. As for the time out in the last minute, i assume rather than calling the time out for a set play that doesn't carry over to the second half , we should just disregard the TO. A perceived lack of success would be a great reason to eliminate the need to develop a play with future value. That 20 sec time out before the half really destroys all that momentum going to the locker room.
BTW...GTHAU
DawgatAuburn wrote: _________________________________________________ What is it he needs to improve on? He is second on the team in FG% to Jarvis. Second on the team in 3 PT% to Kodi. Fourth in FT%, at 70%. Gets a rebound every four minutes, roughly the same as Kodi and twice as frequently as Ravern. Granted, he turns it over too much. It's not like ball security has been a hallmark of Mississippi State under Stansbury and Williams though. He should be playing more. End of story. The hockey line sub pattern post earlier was a great anaolgy and sadly accurate. It's as predictable as the timeout we call on our last offensive possession of the half. I would love to see how often we score off of whatever it is we set up at that timeout.