Genuine question. Did most all companies start rising more exponentially versus linearly between 2011 and 2014/15?Their stocks have a similar pattern to the Dow overall as well as most successful publicly traded companies?
One of the biggest financial disasters ever.Obamacare.
Blame the insurance companies though!!One of the biggest financial disasters ever.
100%. It absolutely wrecked my then-great insurance.Market cap increase coincides with the passage and implementation of the ACA.
And making up solutions to nonexistent problems. Add the DTC that ultimately makes doctors fight a losing battle when patients come in demanding drugs for their psychosomatic problem. Then there’s the demand that doctors see so many patients a day which leaves them little time to fully understand the patient and their problem(s).View attachment 712179
Lots of money in killing people.
They definitely have some culpability. But the government saying everyone is "entitled" to Health Insurance so everyone therefore is "required" to have "health coverage" is also at fault. There are only 2 certainties in life: Death and Taxes! And I recommend between the 2, you take the taxes! But nobody is even guaranteed health care! SOMEBODY has to pay for it. I need to make healthier choices. I paid into Medicare and so am using my Medicare.Blame the insurance companies though!!
What is it about you that makes you think that folks are always out to 17 people over? That’s probably the bigger question here.Several things such as they are all health insurance companies but something else stands out.
Same here. I pay a LOT more for a LOT less.100%. It absolutely wrecked my then-great insurance.
You're 14 years older now than you were in 2010, right?Same here. I pay a LOT more for a LOT less.
Yes, but it's beyond that, WAY beyond that. I'd I had kept what I originally had; I would be paying somewhere around 15-20 times what I did. As it is I'm paying three times what I did, My deductible is 25 times what it was. Before you start, I checked on the Obamacare exchanges, THOSE are even worse.You're 14 years older now than you were in 2010, right?
I do not believe you're being honest about a 15x - 20x multiplier on premium at all. That's what, $100 a month to $1,500 a month? There's no age where that's happening.Yes, but it's beyond that, WAY beyond that. I'd I had kept what I originally had; I would be paying somewhere around 15-20 times what I did. As it is I'm paying three times what I did, My deductible is 25 times what it was. Before you start, I checked on the Obamacare exchanges, THOSE are even worse.
A lot people get it through their jobs. Age and health on an individual do not affect the individual. It affects the group. The group helps off sets the adverse selection. The older employees retire, and the younger ones helps off set. Trust me Obama Care caused the group rate to go up and got you less coverage. My company is self-insured with a third-party carrier. 14 years ago, my company took the leap and jack our premiums way up to cover the things Obama care forced them to cover. They did not cut what coverage we already had. It has gone up about every other year but not too bad. Last year we got a premium holiday in December. No premium for December last year. 2025 we will have increase in premium. Our plan does not have to show a profit. It just needs to stay solvent. I am pretty lucky.You're 14 years older now than you were in 2010, right?
I'm being 100% honest on the deductible, 200 to 5000, Obviously the premium is speculation, I can't even GET a policy like I had now, and haven't been able to for years. I based that figure on the trends as it has escalated as I upped my deductible, and what they were asking to keep the old one from year to year. To keep my current premium this year I would have had to accept yet another doubling of the deductible. To keep my current deductible, I'm having to accept another 20% increase in premium. I'm self-employed so this is the open market. The biggest jumps % wise were in the first 2-3 years after the ACA was enacted. I'm paying about three times what I payed back then. I was talking about what it would have been if I had been able to keep what I had.I do not believe you're being honest about a 15x - 20x multiplier on premium at all. That's what, $100 a month to $1,500 a month? There's no age where that's happening.
Probably exaggerating on the 25x deductible too, but I guess it's possible you went from .... $300 to $7,500? Though that $300 deductible plan would have cost way more than $100 back in 2010.
Government mostly responsibleThey definitely have some culpability. But the government saying everyone is "entitled" to Health Insurance so everyone therefore is "required" to have "health coverage" is also at fault. There are only 2 certainties in life: Death and Taxes! And I recommend between the 2, you take the taxes! But nobody is even guaranteed health care! SOMEBODY has to pay for it. I need to make healthier choices. I paid into Medicare and so am using my Medicare.
Hospitals and other providers are the least responsible BY FAR. They are at the mercy of the other two.Government mostly responsible
Insurance somewhat responsible but they aren’t making crazy profit margins
Hospitals responsible. More than insurance and less than government.
Uh....you might be surprised at the rate of growth of hospital administrators over the last few decades.....let's just say it's in the thousands % points....yes that's right! Those are not cheap jobs.Hospitals and other providers are the least responsible BY FAR. They are at the mercy of the other two.
Who am I saying is getting 17ed over and who am I saying is doing the 17ing over?What is it about you that makes you think that folks are always out to 17 people over? That’s probably the bigger question here.
So you are perfectly ok with current insurance premiums then right?I do not believe you're being honest about a 15x - 20x multiplier on premium at all. That's what, $100 a month to $1,500 a month? There's no age where that's happening.
Probably exaggerating on the 25x deductible too, but I guess it's possible you went from .... $300 to $7,500? Though that $300 deductible plan would have cost way more than $100 back in 2010.
Bull $h1tHospitals and other providers are the least responsible BY FAR. They are at the mercy of the other two.
Something to consider, sure…..but I went from about $600/month to almost $1500/month in ONE YEAR. Had my wife not gotten a public school teaching job we’d have been in a mess.You're 14 years older now than you were in 2010, right?
I don't know why you're making up fake quotes and attributing them to me, but you do you... ¯¯\_(ツ)_/¯¯So you are perfectly ok with current insurance premiums then right?
and you aren’t screaming that they are taking advantage of all the poor little people in the USA right?
I didn’t quote anything. I asked 2 questions. Not surprised you wouldn’t answer them though.I don't know why you're making up fake quotes and attributing them to me, but you do you... ¯¯\_(ツ)_/¯¯
What are you even talking about? I have never said either of those sentences you pulled out of your aѕs and implied that I say/believe. "No and no" is my answer.I didn’t quote anything. I asked 2 questions. Not surprised you wouldn’t answer them though.
So you aren’t happy with current insurance premiums and you don’t think insurance companies are taking advantage of people?What are you even talking about? I have never said either of those sentences you pulled out of your aѕs and implied that I say/believe. "No and no" is my answer.
You do know the government sets the reimbursement rates right? All of them, except for cash. List price has nothing to do with actual payments when a third party is involved. Listing prices wouldn't accomplish a thing except to make it even MORE confusing.Bull $h1t
how do I know that?
bc if I pay cash, it’s one price. If I have insurance it’s a much higher price.
how about hospitals not advertising prices or listing them?
You continue to put words in my mouth.So you aren’t happy with current insurance premiums and you don’t think insurance companies are taking advantage of people?
Maybe i'm missing something but i think you are wrong as it pertains to private insurance.You do know the government sets the reimbursement rates right? All of them, except for cash. List price has nothing to do with actual payments when a third party is involved. Listing prices wouldn't accomplish a thing except to make it even MORE confusing.
Thats what you said.You continue to put words in my mouth.
There are hundreds of health insurance companies in the country, some are for-profit, others not. I'm not going to paint them all with a broad brush.
All I'm saying is that when people compare their premiums today to their premiums 14 years ago, they are often not taking into account key factors such as:
- They are 14 years older and will automatically get a higher premium from that. You can see the age curve here: https://www.cms.gov/CCIIO/Programs-...t-Reforms/Downloads/StateSpecAgeCrv053117.pdf
- Going from 40 to 54 increases the age factor from 1.278 to 2.135, or an increase of 67%. That means that if the insurance company never changed benefits and never increased premiums, your premium would still be 67% higher in 2024 than in 2010.
- And without the ACA, it would even be higher, because one of the "features" of the ACA was to squish that of 64 to 21 year old rates down to 3:1, when previously 5:1 and 7:1 were more common.
- They likely have different benefits today than they had 14 years ago.
- They may have changed coverage types, for example previously an employer was picking up part of the tab, and now that's not the case, or maybe the employer contribution has changed.
- They may not really remember the exact amounts from 14 years ago (no shade thrown - who remembers exact bills from that long ago anyway) and just have a "feeling" that it was a lot lower.
- And yes, the ACA requirement to cover everyone without charging more for risk has brought in higher risk into the market than we had in 2010. But don't assume that just because you were healthy enough to get coverage in 2010 that you still would be in 2024, or that you would still be in the lowest risk tier without a extra surcharge. I think it's definitely better to pay a little more and guarantee coverage to everyone than it is to pay a little less but play Russian Roulette every year and hope you're healthy enough.
Is the ACA perfect? No, but it's a hell of a lot better than what we used to have (which is why Republicans held a trifecta for 2 years and couldn't pass a repeal, even when their replacement plan was to keep 95% of it in place and just market it as a "repeal"), and it's why the incoming Republican trifecta doesn't even have a replacement in mind beyond "concepts of a plan."
You are talking about price. I'm talking about reimbursement rates. Those are very much NOT the same thing.Maybe i'm missing something but i think you are wrong as it pertains to private insurance.
click here for price transparency article
Federal rules on price transparency
Prices for routine healthcare services can vary across the U.S. and even within a given region. Advocates of price transparency argue that it will lower consumer health costs by increasing competition among providers and giving patients the option of “shopping” for the best price. While the federal government and states set reimbursement rates for the Medicare and Medicaid programs, there is generally no price regulation in the private insurance market. The notable exception is Maryland where the state sets hospital rates for all payers. The Affordable Care Act (ACA) requires that hospitals publish a list of standard charges for all given services, which are the unnegotiated, undiscounted rates for services. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ (CMS) price transparency rules draw on the legal authority established under the ACA and interpret its transparency requirement to include payer-negotiated rates.
The latest final rule requires that insurers in the individual and group markets and self-funded employer plans provide enrollees with price and cost-sharing information for covered health services in non-grandfathered plans.
It's killing healthcare. All it did was exacerbate all the trends people hate, including the ones people are blasting the guy who was murdered for.You continue to put words in my mouth.
There are hundreds of health insurance companies in the country, some are for-profit, others not. I'm not going to paint them all with a broad brush.
All I'm saying is that when people compare their premiums today to their premiums 14 years ago, they are often not taking into account key factors such as:
- They are 14 years older and will automatically get a higher premium from that. You can see the age curve here: https://www.cms.gov/CCIIO/Programs-...t-Reforms/Downloads/StateSpecAgeCrv053117.pdf
- Going from 40 to 54 increases the age factor from 1.278 to 2.135, or an increase of 67%. That means that if the insurance company never changed benefits and never increased premiums, your premium would still be 67% higher in 2024 than in 2010.
- And without the ACA, it would even be higher, because one of the "features" of the ACA was to squish that of 64 to 21 year old rates down to 3:1, when previously 5:1 and 7:1 were more common.
- They likely have different benefits today than they had 14 years ago.
- They may have changed coverage types, for example previously an employer was picking up part of the tab, and now that's not the case, or maybe the employer contribution has changed.
- They may not really remember the exact amounts from 14 years ago (no shade thrown - who remembers exact bills from that long ago anyway) and just have a "feeling" that it was a lot lower.
- And yes, the ACA requirement to cover everyone without charging more for risk has brought in higher risk into the market than we had in 2010. But don't assume that just because you were healthy enough to get coverage in 2010 that you still would be in 2024, or that you would still be in the lowest risk tier without a extra surcharge. I think it's definitely better to pay a little more and guarantee coverage to everyone than it is to pay a little less but play Russian Roulette every year and hope you're healthy enough.
Is the ACA perfect? No, but it's a hell of a lot better than what we used to have (which is why Republicans held a trifecta for 2 years and couldn't pass a repeal, even when their replacement plan was to keep 95% of it in place and just market it as a "repeal"), and it's why the incoming Republican trifecta doesn't even have a replacement in mind beyond "concepts of a plan."