What do they all have in common?

paindonthurt17

Active member
Jul 11, 2024
635
443
63
Several things such as they are all health insurance companies but something else stands out.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0984.png
    IMG_0984.png
    849.3 KB · Views: 9
  • IMG_0985.png
    IMG_0985.png
    814.7 KB · Views: 9
  • IMG_0986.png
    IMG_0986.png
    870.9 KB · Views: 9
  • IMG_0987.png
    IMG_0987.png
    866.2 KB · Views: 9
  • Like
Reactions: drexeldog23

paindonthurt17

Active member
Jul 11, 2024
635
443
63
Their stocks have a similar pattern to the Dow overall as well as most successful publicly traded companies?
Genuine question. Did most all companies start rising more exponentially versus linearly between 2011 and 2014/15?
 

mcdawg22

Well-known member
Sep 18, 2004
11,320
5,682
113
I looked at stock prices for other insurance companies and the items I saw around my house this morning.IMG_7867.pngIMG_7866.pngIMG_7865.pngIMG_7864.pngIMG_7863.png

Several things such as they are all health insurance companies but something else stands out.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_7862.png
    IMG_7862.png
    29.5 KB · Views: 17

WilCoDawg

Well-known member
Sep 6, 2012
4,731
2,950
113
View attachment 712179
Lots of money in killing people.
And making up solutions to nonexistent problems. Add the DTC that ultimately makes doctors fight a losing battle when patients come in demanding drugs for their psychosomatic problem. Then there’s the demand that doctors see so many patients a day which leaves them little time to fully understand the patient and their problem(s).
Drug companies prefer to cover up a symptom versus eliminating the actual issue.
 

Called3rdstrikedawg

Well-known member
May 7, 2016
1,016
968
113
Blame the insurance companies though!!
They definitely have some culpability. But the government saying everyone is "entitled" to Health Insurance so everyone therefore is "required" to have "health coverage" is also at fault. There are only 2 certainties in life: Death and Taxes! And I recommend between the 2, you take the taxes! But nobody is even guaranteed health care! SOMEBODY has to pay for it. I need to make healthier choices. I paid into Medicare and so am using my Medicare.
 

L4Dawg

Well-known member
Oct 27, 2016
7,026
4,162
113
You're 14 years older now than you were in 2010, right?
Yes, but it's beyond that, WAY beyond that. I'd I had kept what I originally had; I would be paying somewhere around 15-20 times what I did. As it is I'm paying three times what I did, My deductible is 25 times what it was. Before you start, I checked on the Obamacare exchanges, THOSE are even worse.
 

QuaoarsKing

Well-known member
Mar 11, 2008
4,856
883
113
Yes, but it's beyond that, WAY beyond that. I'd I had kept what I originally had; I would be paying somewhere around 15-20 times what I did. As it is I'm paying three times what I did, My deductible is 25 times what it was. Before you start, I checked on the Obamacare exchanges, THOSE are even worse.
I do not believe you're being honest about a 15x - 20x multiplier on premium at all. That's what, $100 a month to $1,500 a month? There's no age where that's happening.

Probably exaggerating on the 25x deductible too, but I guess it's possible you went from .... $300 to $7,500? Though that $300 deductible plan would have cost way more than $100 back in 2010.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dawgg

GloryDawg

Well-known member
Mar 3, 2005
15,235
6,493
113
You're 14 years older now than you were in 2010, right?
A lot people get it through their jobs. Age and health on an individual do not affect the individual. It affects the group. The group helps off sets the adverse selection. The older employees retire, and the younger ones helps off set. Trust me Obama Care caused the group rate to go up and got you less coverage. My company is self-insured with a third-party carrier. 14 years ago, my company took the leap and jack our premiums way up to cover the things Obama care forced them to cover. They did not cut what coverage we already had. It has gone up about every other year but not too bad. Last year we got a premium holiday in December. No premium for December last year. 2025 we will have increase in premium. Our plan does not have to show a profit. It just needs to stay solvent. I am pretty lucky.
 

L4Dawg

Well-known member
Oct 27, 2016
7,026
4,162
113
I do not believe you're being honest about a 15x - 20x multiplier on premium at all. That's what, $100 a month to $1,500 a month? There's no age where that's happening.

Probably exaggerating on the 25x deductible too, but I guess it's possible you went from .... $300 to $7,500? Though that $300 deductible plan would have cost way more than $100 back in 2010.
I'm being 100% honest on the deductible, 200 to 5000, Obviously the premium is speculation, I can't even GET a policy like I had now, and haven't been able to for years. I based that figure on the trends as it has escalated as I upped my deductible, and what they were asking to keep the old one from year to year. To keep my current premium this year I would have had to accept yet another doubling of the deductible. To keep my current deductible, I'm having to accept another 20% increase in premium. I'm self-employed so this is the open market. The biggest jumps % wise were in the first 2-3 years after the ACA was enacted. I'm paying about three times what I payed back then. I was talking about what it would have been if I had been able to keep what I had.
 
Last edited:

paindonthurt17

Active member
Jul 11, 2024
635
443
63
They definitely have some culpability. But the government saying everyone is "entitled" to Health Insurance so everyone therefore is "required" to have "health coverage" is also at fault. There are only 2 certainties in life: Death and Taxes! And I recommend between the 2, you take the taxes! But nobody is even guaranteed health care! SOMEBODY has to pay for it. I need to make healthier choices. I paid into Medicare and so am using my Medicare.
Government mostly responsible

Insurance somewhat responsible but they aren’t making crazy profit margins

Hospitals responsible. More than insurance and less than government.
 

L4Dawg

Well-known member
Oct 27, 2016
7,026
4,162
113
Government mostly responsible

Insurance somewhat responsible but they aren’t making crazy profit margins

Hospitals responsible. More than insurance and less than government.
Hospitals and other providers are the least responsible BY FAR. They are at the mercy of the other two.
 

HRMSU

Well-known member
Apr 26, 2022
960
784
93
Hospitals and other providers are the least responsible BY FAR. They are at the mercy of the other two.
Uh....you might be surprised at the rate of growth of hospital administrators over the last few decades.....let's just say it's in the thousands % points....yes that's right! Those are not cheap jobs.
 

paindonthurt17

Active member
Jul 11, 2024
635
443
63
I do not believe you're being honest about a 15x - 20x multiplier on premium at all. That's what, $100 a month to $1,500 a month? There's no age where that's happening.

Probably exaggerating on the 25x deductible too, but I guess it's possible you went from .... $300 to $7,500? Though that $300 deductible plan would have cost way more than $100 back in 2010.
So you are perfectly ok with current insurance premiums then right?

and you aren’t screaming that they are taking advantage of all the poor little people in the USA right?
 

paindonthurt17

Active member
Jul 11, 2024
635
443
63
Hospitals and other providers are the least responsible BY FAR. They are at the mercy of the other two.
Bull $h1t

how do I know that?

bc if I pay cash, it’s one price. If I have insurance it’s a much higher price.

how about hospitals not advertising prices or listing them?
 

QuaoarsKing

Well-known member
Mar 11, 2008
4,856
883
113
So you are perfectly ok with current insurance premiums then right?

and you aren’t screaming that they are taking advantage of all the poor little people in the USA right?
I don't know why you're making up fake quotes and attributing them to me, but you do you... ¯¯\_(ツ)_/¯¯
 

MaxwellSmart

Active member
May 28, 2007
2,188
403
83
When I retired in Oct of last year, my monthly premium was $700. Jan of this year it went up to $1050 a month and it will be $1300 a month this Jan.
 

QuaoarsKing

Well-known member
Mar 11, 2008
4,856
883
113
I didn’t quote anything. I asked 2 questions. Not surprised you wouldn’t answer them though.
What are you even talking about? I have never said either of those sentences you pulled out of your aѕs and implied that I say/believe. "No and no" is my answer.
 

paindonthurt17

Active member
Jul 11, 2024
635
443
63
What are you even talking about? I have never said either of those sentences you pulled out of your aѕs and implied that I say/believe. "No and no" is my answer.
So you aren’t happy with current insurance premiums and you don’t think insurance companies are taking advantage of people?

well that’s kind of the point the poster was making you replied to.

premiums have gone up driven by something and it isn’t simply company greed. But there is evidence that it’s due to Obama care
 

L4Dawg

Well-known member
Oct 27, 2016
7,026
4,162
113
Bull $h1t

how do I know that?

bc if I pay cash, it’s one price. If I have insurance it’s a much higher price.

how about hospitals not advertising prices or listing them?
You do know the government sets the reimbursement rates right? All of them, except for cash. List price has nothing to do with actual payments when a third party is involved. Listing prices wouldn't accomplish a thing except to make it even MORE confusing.
 

QuaoarsKing

Well-known member
Mar 11, 2008
4,856
883
113
So you aren’t happy with current insurance premiums and you don’t think insurance companies are taking advantage of people?
You continue to put words in my mouth.

There are hundreds of health insurance companies in the country, some are for-profit, others not. I'm not going to paint them all with a broad brush.

All I'm saying is that when people compare their premiums today to their premiums 14 years ago, they are often not taking into account key factors such as:
  • They are 14 years older and will automatically get a higher premium from that. You can see the age curve here: https://www.cms.gov/CCIIO/Programs-...t-Reforms/Downloads/StateSpecAgeCrv053117.pdf
    • Going from 40 to 54 increases the age factor from 1.278 to 2.135, or an increase of 67%. That means that if the insurance company never changed benefits and never increased premiums, your premium would still be 67% higher in 2024 than in 2010.
    • And without the ACA, it would even be higher, because one of the "features" of the ACA was to squish that of 64 to 21 year old rates down to 3:1, when previously 5:1 and 7:1 were more common.
  • They likely have different benefits today than they had 14 years ago.
  • They may have changed coverage types, for example previously an employer was picking up part of the tab, and now that's not the case, or maybe the employer contribution has changed.
  • They may not really remember the exact amounts from 14 years ago (no shade thrown - who remembers exact bills from that long ago anyway) and just have a "feeling" that it was a lot lower.
  • And yes, the ACA requirement to cover everyone without charging more for risk has brought in higher risk into the market than we had in 2010. But don't assume that just because you were healthy enough to get coverage in 2010 that you still would be in 2024, or that you would still be in the lowest risk tier without a extra surcharge. I think it's definitely better to pay a little more and guarantee coverage to everyone than it is to pay a little less but play Russian Roulette every year and hope you're healthy enough.

Is the ACA perfect? No, but it's a hell of a lot better than what we used to have (which is why Republicans held a trifecta for 2 years and couldn't pass a repeal, even when their replacement plan was to keep 95% of it in place and just market it as a "repeal"), and it's why the incoming Republican trifecta doesn't even have a replacement in mind beyond "concepts of a plan."
 

paindonthurt17

Active member
Jul 11, 2024
635
443
63
You do know the government sets the reimbursement rates right? All of them, except for cash. List price has nothing to do with actual payments when a third party is involved. Listing prices wouldn't accomplish a thing except to make it even MORE confusing.
Maybe i'm missing something but i think you are wrong as it pertains to private insurance.

click here for price transparency article

Federal rules on price transparency

Prices for routine healthcare services can vary across the U.S. and even within a given region. Advocates of price transparency argue that it will lower consumer health costs by increasing competition among providers and giving patients the option of “shopping” for the best price. While the federal government and states set reimbursement rates for the Medicare and Medicaid programs, there is generally no price regulation in the private insurance market. The notable exception is Maryland where the state sets hospital rates for all payers. The Affordable Care Act (ACA) requires that hospitals publish a list of standard charges for all given services, which are the unnegotiated, undiscounted rates for services. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ (CMS) price transparency rules draw on the legal authority established under the ACA and interpret its transparency requirement to include payer-negotiated rates.

The latest final rule requires that insurers in the individual and group markets and self-funded employer plans provide enrollees with price and cost-sharing information for covered health services in non-grandfathered plans.
 

paindonthurt17

Active member
Jul 11, 2024
635
443
63
You continue to put words in my mouth.

There are hundreds of health insurance companies in the country, some are for-profit, others not. I'm not going to paint them all with a broad brush.

All I'm saying is that when people compare their premiums today to their premiums 14 years ago, they are often not taking into account key factors such as:
  • They are 14 years older and will automatically get a higher premium from that. You can see the age curve here: https://www.cms.gov/CCIIO/Programs-...t-Reforms/Downloads/StateSpecAgeCrv053117.pdf
    • Going from 40 to 54 increases the age factor from 1.278 to 2.135, or an increase of 67%. That means that if the insurance company never changed benefits and never increased premiums, your premium would still be 67% higher in 2024 than in 2010.
    • And without the ACA, it would even be higher, because one of the "features" of the ACA was to squish that of 64 to 21 year old rates down to 3:1, when previously 5:1 and 7:1 were more common.
  • They likely have different benefits today than they had 14 years ago.
  • They may have changed coverage types, for example previously an employer was picking up part of the tab, and now that's not the case, or maybe the employer contribution has changed.
  • They may not really remember the exact amounts from 14 years ago (no shade thrown - who remembers exact bills from that long ago anyway) and just have a "feeling" that it was a lot lower.
  • And yes, the ACA requirement to cover everyone without charging more for risk has brought in higher risk into the market than we had in 2010. But don't assume that just because you were healthy enough to get coverage in 2010 that you still would be in 2024, or that you would still be in the lowest risk tier without a extra surcharge. I think it's definitely better to pay a little more and guarantee coverage to everyone than it is to pay a little less but play Russian Roulette every year and hope you're healthy enough.

Is the ACA perfect? No, but it's a hell of a lot better than what we used to have (which is why Republicans held a trifecta for 2 years and couldn't pass a repeal, even when their replacement plan was to keep 95% of it in place and just market it as a "repeal"), and it's why the incoming Republican trifecta doesn't even have a replacement in mind beyond "concepts of a plan."
Thats what you said.

You arent happy with insurance premiums and you don't think insurance companies are taking advantage

paindonthurt17 said:
So you are perfectly ok with current insurance premiums then right?

and you aren’t screaming that they are taking advantage of all the poor little people in the USA right?

You
"No and no" is my answer.
 

L4Dawg

Well-known member
Oct 27, 2016
7,026
4,162
113
Maybe i'm missing something but i think you are wrong as it pertains to private insurance.

click here for price transparency article

Federal rules on price transparency

Prices for routine healthcare services can vary across the U.S. and even within a given region. Advocates of price transparency argue that it will lower consumer health costs by increasing competition among providers and giving patients the option of “shopping” for the best price. While the federal government and states set reimbursement rates for the Medicare and Medicaid programs, there is generally no price regulation in the private insurance market. The notable exception is Maryland where the state sets hospital rates for all payers. The Affordable Care Act (ACA) requires that hospitals publish a list of standard charges for all given services, which are the unnegotiated, undiscounted rates for services. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ (CMS) price transparency rules draw on the legal authority established under the ACA and interpret its transparency requirement to include payer-negotiated rates.

The latest final rule requires that insurers in the individual and group markets and self-funded employer plans provide enrollees with price and cost-sharing information for covered health services in non-grandfathered plans.
You are talking about price. I'm talking about reimbursement rates. Those are very much NOT the same thing.
 

L4Dawg

Well-known member
Oct 27, 2016
7,026
4,162
113
You continue to put words in my mouth.

There are hundreds of health insurance companies in the country, some are for-profit, others not. I'm not going to paint them all with a broad brush.

All I'm saying is that when people compare their premiums today to their premiums 14 years ago, they are often not taking into account key factors such as:
  • They are 14 years older and will automatically get a higher premium from that. You can see the age curve here: https://www.cms.gov/CCIIO/Programs-...t-Reforms/Downloads/StateSpecAgeCrv053117.pdf
    • Going from 40 to 54 increases the age factor from 1.278 to 2.135, or an increase of 67%. That means that if the insurance company never changed benefits and never increased premiums, your premium would still be 67% higher in 2024 than in 2010.
    • And without the ACA, it would even be higher, because one of the "features" of the ACA was to squish that of 64 to 21 year old rates down to 3:1, when previously 5:1 and 7:1 were more common.
  • They likely have different benefits today than they had 14 years ago.
  • They may have changed coverage types, for example previously an employer was picking up part of the tab, and now that's not the case, or maybe the employer contribution has changed.
  • They may not really remember the exact amounts from 14 years ago (no shade thrown - who remembers exact bills from that long ago anyway) and just have a "feeling" that it was a lot lower.
  • And yes, the ACA requirement to cover everyone without charging more for risk has brought in higher risk into the market than we had in 2010. But don't assume that just because you were healthy enough to get coverage in 2010 that you still would be in 2024, or that you would still be in the lowest risk tier without a extra surcharge. I think it's definitely better to pay a little more and guarantee coverage to everyone than it is to pay a little less but play Russian Roulette every year and hope you're healthy enough.

Is the ACA perfect? No, but it's a hell of a lot better than what we used to have (which is why Republicans held a trifecta for 2 years and couldn't pass a repeal, even when their replacement plan was to keep 95% of it in place and just market it as a "repeal"), and it's why the incoming Republican trifecta doesn't even have a replacement in mind beyond "concepts of a plan."
It's killing healthcare. All it did was exacerbate all the trends people hate, including the ones people are blasting the guy who was murdered for.
 
Get unlimited access today.

Pick the right plan for you.

Already a member? Login