He (harrybollocks) isn't wrong. I know he was sarcastic and I know regressing to the mean wasn't the intent, but it MOST DEFINITELY WAS what happened, and is happening.^ currently this has 1 upvote and 2 downvotes.
^ currently this has 2 upvotes and 1 downvote.
The post that reiterates why math has changed and compliments the OP on their involvement in education at home has 1 upvote and 2 downvotes.
The post that rambles off some sarcastic claim that we want to lower the bar to close the achievement gap has 2 upvotes and 1 downvote.
Felt that was worth pointing out for perspective. A lot in our society needs to change.
Of course I do.Do you have actual data and personal interactions to back that up or are you going off of your own thoughts on that? Do you work with college students on a regular basis and working with both kids that come from home school, public, and private schools to make that observation?
When will a person be around this diverse group of people, later in life, all the same age, in a classroom setting or even a high school campus setting? I'm not saying whether or not it's beneficial, I'm simply questioning if school is the best way to accomplish it, and if the drawbacks are worth those benefits.
This is really not the main reasoning for homeschooling (or private schooling) in the modern era. And it's hardly confined to the homeschool and private school community.
Do you have actual data and personal interactions to back that up or are you going off of your own thoughts on that? Do you work with college students on a regular basis and working with both kids that come from home school, public, and private schools to make that observation?
And as evidence of this, you provided the smallest possible sample size of anecdotal data that actually supports (not proves, to be clear) the other side of the argument.It's not that they think it means it 100% of the cases, it's that they think it's some big causative factor, when if anything it's such a small factor you can't distinguish it from noise.
I actually agree with this, for this point in time. It's like a 'good' public school.....if you have good students, the school will be good. Nothing the 'school' itself does to be 'good'. If you bring in bad students to a good school, that school will eventually become bad.
Same with homeschoolers and private schoolers. For the longest time, only weird kids homeschooled (for the reasons you mentioned). That has absolutely changed. Now many good students are homeschooling. I think you will see a whole new wave of homeschooled kids and those stereotypes will go away.
But....old stereotypes take a while to die out. I mean, people still think the public school is the best way to educate kids, and that's been debunked a while back. It's just what people know and are used to.
It’s not about being around them all at the same time. It’s the one-on-one and small group interactions with people outside your normal comfort zone that you have at a much higher frequency than you ever will be able to have until you either get to college or enter the work force. Those are both places that you really don’t want to still be learning basic social interaction and other soft skills.
I never said it was the main reasoning. I’d venture a guess that better than 50% of home school parents do a great job of exposing their kids to other forms of socialization. But it does still happen, and it happens at a much greater frequency with home school than private school, and a much greater frequency for both than it does for public school.
Helping my six year old, first grade, with his homework. This math lesson tells me that 3 + 3 is considered a “double plus,” because there are two 3’s. Then it tells me to explain how 3 + 4 is a “double plus 1,” because you added one to the second 3. It then asks to have your kid look throughout the house for both “double plus” objects, such as things with 2-3-4 of the same stuff in it- IE two rolling die or a bike because two tires- and have them call out “double plus!”
How in the hell do you explain that to a six year old?
My wife works with high school and middle school aged children and has done so for the last two decades. She (and I) would tell you that your ideas about homeschooled children are neanderthal-esque and that's putting it mildly. Yes there are weird kids from the homeschooled contingent. There were weird kids at my public high school. There are weird kids at my children's private school. In our experience some of the brightest most accomplished students we've ever interacted with were homeschooled. These are kids who went on to work at NASA, work on blockbuster Hollywood films, make arguments before the supreme court, and more. You don't do those things if you can't work with people.
Have you ever considered that maybe some kids are socially awkward and/or on the spectrum and their parents feel like homeschooling is their only chance to do well in school? "Homeschool" as a cohort doesn't get to kick people out if they don't do it correctly.
It's kind of like Greek GPA vs. Independent GPA. Of course the Greek GPA is higher. They kick you out if you don't make grades.
I think this maybe pins down the disconnect. I guess every time you meet somebody, if you can't fit them in some approximation of a cookie cutter outline of somebody you've met before, it makes you anxious? I don't know how common that is or that many people have a "comfort zone" such that they have trouble interacting with people at least on a professional level if they are not similar to people they've worked with in the past. I'm not a people person by any means, but I don't know that I've ever felt anxious about dealing with somebody because they were the first whatever you can think of I've had to deal with. And I don't feel like most people fail to learn basic social interaction and other soft skills just because the people they interact with are similar to them? I think you learn basic social interaction and soft skills dealing with people that are similar to you, and that at least in most professional settings in the US, that will get you a long even with people from many different backgrounds and experiences? Maybe you learn some social group specific norms or quirks that you have to learn aren't universally applicable, but I don't know how prevalent and hard to identify those would be.
And as evidence of this, you provided the smallest possible sample size of anecdotal data that actually supports (not proves, to be clear) the other side of the argument.
FTR, I'm not even on a side in this. I don't have a clue. I know one home-schooled girl through my daughters' dance company, and she is a delight. I'm not drawing any conclusions from that, though, and I'm certainly not drawing the opposite conclusion of what that one piece of data indicates