I have a different point of view ... the majority of "PSU Football" fans who would post on these boards were really Joe Paterno (and the air of superiority his legacy was meant to convey) fans, and once that legacy was tarnished (rightfully or wrongfully), you were left, mainly, with people who would die on their swords to defend that legacy, and folks who just didn't see the program as special anymore, so they gave up, and looked for ways to criticize anything new and different.
The transfer portal actually made college football MORE amateurish, allowing athletes to transfer almost as easily as actual students would be able to do. But many people don't like that ... because they want these kids who they have no relation/attachment to, other than attending the same school, to be locked in to 4 or 5 year "contracts," so they know who to root for over that time period.
The NIL is just an imperfect way to break the bonds of the modified indentured servitude to which these kids were subjected. "Entertain us for 3 to 5 years, and we'll adore you like gods ... break the illusion that you're here to entertain us and make us feel better about ourselves by cheering for the success of 'our team,' and we'll turn on you for asserting your individual rights, and your own self-worth." I side with the kids who are trying to better themselves while grown men try to profit (greatly) off their labors.