Yeah it’s all good! No big deal!

[paindonthurt]

 

[jethreauxdawg]

View attachment 328332

Makes things easier for groomers if they can hide the children from people that might actually care about them.

 

[DawgsGoneWild]

Wow. The end is near folks. Be right with the maker

 

[The Cooterpoot]

They also made it where law enforcement cannot obtain abortion records to arrest folks for that.

 

[PBDog]

They just want to love who they want remember

it’s always been the big goal of getting to our children

 

[ronpolk]

They also made it where law enforcement cannot obtain abortion records to arrest folks for that.

I didn’t realize law enforcement could currently obtain medical records to arrest someone for an abortion.

 

[Rupert Jenkins]

This country is no longer America. Some of us in Mississippi still have not noticed it yet. But it's coming here soon.

 

[paindonthurt]

I didn’t realize law enforcement could currently obtain medical records to arrest someone for an abortion.

I mean im not really ok with this and I’m not a pro choice guy.

 

[ababyatemydingo]

View attachment 328332

That's some crazy shite, right there. People that defend and encourage that are deplorable. Eastern Washington is trying to secede from western WA. And be a part of Idaho

 

[paindonthurt]

That's some crazy shite, right there. People that defend and encourage that are deplorable. Eastern Washington is trying to secede from western WA. And be a part of Idaho

I don’t think all lefties support it but not many of them calling it out for the disgusting thing it is.

 

[SouthFarmchicken]

View attachment 328332

Looks like something that will be overturned by courts if it passes both houses.

 

[Boom Boom]

View attachment 328332

This summary misstates the bill. Normally youths that run away from home and wind up in a shelter, the shelter is required to notify the parents. There are exceptions for abuse and health care. This bill adds gender affirming health care, BUT like the others it only substitutes informing CPS instead of the parents. It's not like they are there in secret. Like other cases, CPS is supposed to step in and do their job (iffy statement I know). The stated reason for the bill is, as currently stands, these youths are avoiding shelters and living on the streets. That's not a better outcome. I don't really like this response to that problem, but I can't think of anything better.

Rubes gonna be rubes. Yall never learn, and keep getting led around as the world's biggest idiots.

 

[Maroon Eagle]

Dude. Epoch Times?

That’s the Occupy Democrats of the right.

At least get something from the Free Beacon which also skews right, is much more trustworthy, and goes into the fact that the bill deals with potentially abused runaways (as Boom Boom mentions and the article snippet you provided didn’t).

Washington State Democrats Vote to Hide Transgender Runaways From Parents

Washington State could soon require youth shelters to hide minors who run away from home in order to obtain an abortion or sex change operations without parental consent.

freebeacon.com

 

[L4Dawg]

This summary misstates the bill. Normally youths that run away from home and wind up in a shelter, the shelter is required to notify the parents. There are exceptions for abuse and health care. This bill adds gender affirming health care, BUT like the others it only substitutes informing CPS instead of the parents. It's not like they are there in secret. Like other cases, CPS is supposed to step in and do their job (iffy statement I know). The stated reason for the bill is, as currently stands, these youths are avoiding shelters and living on the streets. That's not a better outcome. I don't really like this response to that problem, but I can't think of anything better.

Rubes gonna be rubes. Yall never learn, and keep getting led around as the world's biggest idiots.

So you support not getting parental consent on this? REALLY?

 

[Maroon Eagle]

So you support not getting parental consent on this? REALLY?

So abusive parents should have the authority to give consent?

That’s why CPS is being brought in.

(Iffy. REALLY iffy I know. And Boom Boom knows this too.)

Edit to add: It’s much more complicated than the simplistic Epoch Times version which is what Boom Boom and I are both getting at.

 

[HotMop]

This summary misstates the bill. Normally youths that run away from home and wind up in a shelter, the shelter is required to notify the parents. There are exceptions for abuse and health care. This bill adds gender affirming health care, BUT like the others it only substitutes informing CPS instead of the parents. It's not like they are there in secret. Like other cases, CPS is supposed to step in and do their job (iffy statement I know). The stated reason for the bill is, as currently stands, these youths are avoiding shelters and living on the streets. That's not a better outcome. I don't really like this response to that problem, but I can't think of anything better.

Rubes gonna be rubes. Yall never learn, and keep getting led around as the world's biggest

This summary misstates the bill. Normally youths that run away from home and wind up in a shelter, the shelter is required to notify the parents. There are exceptions for abuse and health care. This bill adds gender affirming health care, BUT like the others it only substitutes informing CPS instead of the parents. It's not like they are there in secret. Like other cases, CPS is supposed to step in and do their job (iffy statement I know). The stated reason for the bill is, as currently stands, these youths are avoiding shelters and living on the streets. That's not a better outcome. I don't really like this response to that problem, but I can't think of anything better.

Rubes gonna be rubes. Yall never learn, and keep getting led around as the world's biggest idiots.

Dylan?

 

[thatsbaseball]

This summary misstates the bill. Normally youths that run away from home and wind up in a shelter, the shelter is required to notify the parents. There are exceptions for abuse and health care. This bill adds gender affirming health care, BUT like the others it only substitutes informing CPS instead of the parents. It's not like they are there in secret. Like other cases, CPS is supposed to step in and do their job (iffy statement I know). The stated reason for the bill is, as currently stands, these

So you support not getting parental consent on this? REALLY?

He's just one of our liberal trolls trying to turn this into 5 page thread by making a provocative statement to get it started.

 

[paindonthurt]

This summary misstates the bill. Normally youths that run away from home and wind up in a shelter, the shelter is required to notify the parents. There are exceptions for abuse and health care. This bill adds gender affirming health care, BUT like the others it only substitutes informing CPS instead of the parents. It's not like they are there in secret. Like other cases, CPS is supposed to step in and do their job (iffy statement I know). The stated reason for the bill is, as currently stands, these youths are avoiding shelters and living on the streets. That's not a better outcome. I don't really like this response to that problem, but I can't think of anything better.

Rubes gonna be rubes. Yall never learn, and keep getting led around as the world's biggest idiots.

So abusive parents should have the authority to give consent?

That’s why CPS is being brought in.

(Iffy. REALLY iffy I know. And Boom Boom knows this too.)

Edit to add: It’s much more complicated than the simplistic Epoch Times version which is what Boom Boom and I are both getting at.

Boom boom doesn’t know .

and if you are trusting his word you don’t know either.

 

[ronpolk]

So abusive parents should have the authority to give consent?

That’s why CPS is being brought in.

(Iffy. REALLY iffy I know. And Boom Boom knows this too.)

Edit to add: It’s much more complicated than the simplistic Epoch Times version which is what Boom Boom and I are both getting at.

Is there actual abuse or abuse being defined here as parents not allowing their kid to have surgery to change their gender?

I can appreciate this is a very complicated topic for families going through this. However, I think there is a simple solution to this. You can’t legally have gender changing surgery until you’re 18. You can’t vote till you’re 18, can’t have a glass of wine until you’re 21. No reason why someone can’t wait until they are 18 to make this change. And yes I know there are rare medical conditions that would force a parent to make a decision at a much younger age… that’s obviously an exception here

 

[Maroon Eagle]

Boom boom doesn’t know .

and if you are trusting his word you don’t know either.

It’s not a matter of trusting his word.

The info that’s out there is saying it’s more complicated than what your snippet from the Epoch Times is saying & I even used a news site on the right in my response.

 

[Maroon Eagle]

Is there actual abuse or abuse being defined here as parents not allowing their kid to have surgery to change their gender?

That right there is The First Question to consider in my opinion and a major reason why I think the CPS thing is iffy.

I can appreciate this is a very complicated topic for families going through this. However, I think there is a simple solution to this. You can’t legally have gender changing surgery until you’re 18. You can’t vote till you’re 18, can’t have a glass of wine until you’re 21. No reason why someone can’t wait until they are 18 to make this change. And yes I know there are rare medical conditions that would force a parent to make a decision at a much younger age… that’s obviously an exception here

Agreed.

 

[paindonthurt]

So abusive parents should have the authority to give consent?

That’s why CPS is being brought in.

(Iffy. REALLY iffy I know. And Boom Boom knows this too.)

Edit to add: It’s much more complicated than the simplistic Epoch Times version which is what Boom Boom and I are both getting at.

Compelling reasons is extremely loosely defined which means it will be abused.

https://lawfilesext.leg.wa.gov/biennium/2023-24/Pdf/Amendments/House/5599-S.E%20AMH%20ENGR%20H1742.E.pdf

It’s sick and disgusting.

Why can’t you just call it that?

 

[paindonthurt]

That right there is The First Question to consider in my opinion and a major reason why I think the CPS thing is iffy.



Agreed.

Thank you. You should be more vocal about the agreed part.

 

[Rupert Jenkins]

Listen, if you don't allow your 8 year old son to have his weiner cut off and get on hormones you are being abusive and should have your kids taken away and raised by Gov't pedophiles. Buy him the dress and make up and call him Felicia. I mean he is 8....he knows. It's not just a phase

 

[AstroDog]

In my book, this is called kidnapping.

 

[HailStout]

Remember when we made COVID talk an automatic lock? Can we do the same for this crap?