College Football: What the BCS Top 25 standings would look like ahead of Week 10

The BCS Top 25 may be a thing of the past, but it still provides a fascinating look of what could be, and what may become ahead of the College Football Playoff.

While the system was more than controversial during the time it was implemented, it provides some insight into what the rankings would have looked like during that era, which lasted from 1998-2013. Ahead of the first College Football Playoff rankings release of the season, there’s never a better time to look into the past for inspiration for the future.

Here’s what the BCS Top 25 would look like ahead of Week 10, via @BCSKnowHow on Twitter.

CLICK HERE to subscribe for FREE to the On3 YouTube channel

BCS Top 25 ahead of Week 10:

1. Georgia Bulldogs
2. Ohio State Buckeyes
3. Tennessee Volunteers
4. Michigan Wolverines
5. Clemson Tigers
6. Alabama Crimson Tide
7. TCU Horned Frogs
8. Oregon Ducks
9. USC Trojans
10. Ole Miss Rebels
11. UCLA Bruins
12. Utah Utes
13. Kansas State Wildcats
14. LSU Tigers
15. Penn State Nittany Lions
16. Illinois Fighting Illini 
17. Oklahoma State Cowboys
18. North Carolina Tar Heels
19. Tulane Green Wave
20. Wake Forest Demon Deacons
21. NC State Wolfpack
22. Syracuse Orange
23. Texas Longhorns
24. Liberty Flames
25. Oregon State Beavers

More on the BCS Top 25, College Football Playoff

Prior to the current CFP system, college football was governed by the BCS, whose final rankings were computer generated, and two teams faced off in the national championship to conclude the season. The system also created matchups for four additional prestigious bowl games: the Fiesta Bowl, Orange Bowl, Rose Bowl and Sugar Bowl. 

The BCS formula used a number of factors to produce its list. There were three components to the rankings, with a mix of human and computer generated thoughts: the Harris Poll, the Coaches Poll and the computer rankings. All three parts were weighted equally. 

The Harris and Coaches Polls had values assigned to each spot in reverse order. For example, in the Harris Poll of 25 teams, the top team receives 25 points, the second team receives 24 points, etc. The Coaches Poll had a similar scoring system, although there were fewer voters involved.

The third part, the computer rankings, included six additional polls: Anderson & Hester, Richard Billingsley, Colley Matrix, Kenneth Massey, Jeff Sagarin’s USA Today and Peter Wolfe. In the end, the final values assigned to each team in the three categories are averaged, and the BCS rankings were produced.

Beginning in 2014, the CFP replaced the BCS. Two semifinal games are played around New Year’s Day, and the games take place on a rotating basis at six of the country’s top bowls – the Cotton Bowl, Fiesta Bowl, Orange Bowl, Peach Bowl, Rose Bowl and Sugar Bowl. The two winners advance to the College Football Playoff National Championship. That game is played on a Monday night in the second week of January.

The CFP selection process is more subjective than the BCS, as the teams are decided upon by 13 people and there is no longer a strict computer component. The selection committee is composed of athletic directors, former coaches and student-athletes, and others in the college administration world. The current chair of the committee is Gary Barta, the athletic director at Iowa.

“The selection committee ranks the teams based on the members’ evaluation of the teams’ performance on the field, using conference championships won, strength of schedule, head-to-head results, and comparison of results against common opponents to decide among teams that are comparable,” the website says.

Additionally, there is a board of governors made up of presidents and chancellors from the 10 FBS conferences plus Notre Dame which governs the administrative actions of the CFP.

College football remains the only college sport in the country without an officially NCAA-sanctioned championship. At its core, the CFP is really a television contract currently owned by ESPN.

Ashton Pollard contributed to this article.