The elephant in the college sports room the last few years has now come to the forefront: Title IX.



Just four days after 32 female athletes filed a class-action sex discrimination <a href="https://www.on3.com/os/news/oregon-ducks-female-athletes-file-title-ix-sex-discrimination-class-action-lawsuit-beach-volleyball-rowing/">lawsuit</a> against <a href="https://www.on3.com/teams/oregon-ducks/">Oregon</a>, NCAA President Charlie Baker unveiled a <a href="https://www.on3.com/os/news/ncaa-charlie-baker-proposes-creating-new-subdivision-trust-fund-nil-to-compensate-athletes/">revolutionary proposal</a> that would enable schools to compensate athletes from a trust fund and enter into <a href="https://www.on3.com/nil/deals/">NIL deals</a> with athletes.



Hovering over the entire plan – which Baker references in Tuesday’s letter to members – is Title IX, the 51-year-old <a href="https://www.justice.gov/crt/title-ix">federal law</a> that protects students from sex-based discrimination at any school that receives federal funding. 



Would this proposal ensure Title IX compliance?



“With the majority of schools out of compliance with Title IX and a billion-dollar shortfall in scholarships for women, should we finally make compliance with Title IX a condition of membership?” Seattle-based attorney Julie Sommer, executive director of <a href="https://www.thedrakegroupeducationfund.org/">The Drake Group Education Fund</a>, told On3.



Baker’s plan entails creating a new subdivision of institutions with the highest resources to invest in their student-athletes. Those schools will be committed to creating rules that may differ from the rules in place for the rest of Division I, specifically as it relates to scholarship commitment and roster size, recruitment, <a href="https://www.on3.com/transfer-portal/">transfers</a> or <a href="https://www.on3.com/nil/">NIL</a>.



Within the framework of Title IX, the NCAA’s letter states requirements for schools in the subdivision should include annually investing at least $30,000 per athlete into an enhanced educational trust fund for at least half of the institution’s eligible student-athletes. Importantly, athletes could spend the money any way they choose, and there is no limit on how much schools could provide any subset of athletes – as long as schools remain Title IX compliant. 



Also of great significance: Baker proposes that rules should change for any Division I school, at their choice, to enter into name, image and likeness licensing opportunities with their student-athletes. That is a radical departure from the current system, where third-party, donor-driven <a href="https://www.on3.com/nil/collectives/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">collectives</a> distribute NIL dollars to athletes, the majority of whom are men.



Baker said the significant change to NIL policy “will also help level what is fast becoming a very unlevel playing field between men and women student-athletes because schools will be required to abide by existing gender equity regulations as they make investments in their athletics programs.”



<h2 id="h-schools-prioritize-some-over-others-in-wasteful-ways">Schools ‘prioritize some over others in wasteful ways’</h2>



Legal experts have told On3 they believe some schools have been evading Title IX responsibilities as their affiliated collectives distribute an overwhelming majority of dollars to male athletes. The 115-page Oregon suit is believed to be the first-ever complaint to address a collective’s NIL activity. Oregon said in a statement that school officials believe they are Title IX compliant.



But even after the NCAA’s proposal – widely applauded as a progressive step in the right direction – questions remain over whether schools will be Title IX compliant while compensating athletes through a trust fund and striking NIL deals for athletes.



Before the proposal was unveiled, Maddie Salamone, vice president of the <a href="https://www.cfbpa.org/">College Football Players Association</a>, believed it was only a matter of time before collective NIL activity was going to be scrutinized and schools were going to have to oversee them more. Regarding the trust fund concept, she said, is where you wade into “some interesting territory” and it will put more of an onus on schools to properly budget.



“It’s important to emphasize the fact that these are choices – and it’s not that schools can’t necessarily find the funds to actually pay for all these sports,” said Salamone, adding that if the NCAA requires some schools to spend more money actually on the athletes, then the football teams can’t employ an exorbitant number of coaches.



“They are choosing to prioritize some over others in wasteful ways,” she added. “And I think that that’s where the college model has needed to be rehauled – the philosophy that allows these obscene amounts of money to be spent on coaching staffs and on facilities that are unnecessary. If your priority is to be able to fund all the sports and that’s a worthwhile goal and you want to provide opportunities to all athletes, then that would be where you would choose to spend money and choose to budget more tightly. So, maybe that would be the result of it as you start to get money going in that direction.”



Arthur Bryant, widely considered the nation’s most prominent Title IX attorney and the lead attorney for the plaintiffs in the Oregon suit, recently told On3: “NIL and Title IX are about to collide – and it’s just a question of when and where. Title IX says schools have to provide male student-athletes and female student-athletes with equal treatment and benefits, and almost no school in the country is doing that now without NIL. With NIL, it is far, far worse.”



<h2>In-house collective model good for women athletes?</h2>



With NIL activity moving in-house under the school’s umbrella, it means schools can enter into NIL deals with athletes and that schools would undoubtedly be subject to Title IX requirements. In that scenario, some still harbor concerns that a narrative will form that male athletes are worth more in the marketplace, therefore schools should strike more lucrative deals with them regardless of Title IX gender equity requirements. 



“There’s no acknowledgment of equal or equitable money for women,” Sommer said. “Watch for ‘NIL is gender neutral… men are worth more in the marketplace.’ NIL payments are not sex-based aid or scholarships. But schools have created this male-dominated marketplace value by investing in promoting, televising, and publicizing men’s sports over women’s sports.”



Sommer called the proposal a “bold, interesting move – certainly the most significant effort we’ve seen by the NCAA and this is the right debate to be having, even if the complications are many.” She said it could ultimately end the current NIL collective system by bringing the third-party entities in-house, which she believes is a good thing because the current model was not sustainable and far from equitable.



“At the very basic level,” Sommer said, “the NCAA should advocate for fair national standards for athlete compensation and accountability, fight for Title IX equity and preservation of women’s and Olympic sports, be a voice for the long-term health and well-being of athletes, and create a level playing field with checks and balances that ideally reflect near-term Congressional action. This move addresses some of those issues but many legal and policy level questions remain.”

title ix

On3 NIL

Would the NCAA's trust fund, NIL proposal ensure Title IX compliance?

Teams

Fan Sites

Forums

Shows

team-link

College Football News

College Football Player Rankings

College Football Rankings

College Football Playoff

College Basketball News

Women's Sports

College

NIL News

NIL Valuation

NIL Deals

NIL Deal Tracker

Sports Business

Transfer Portal News

NCAA Transfer Portal News

NCAA Transfer Portal

Transfer Portal Rankings

Transfer Portal Team Rankings

Transfer Portal

NCAA Transfer Portal Home

Football Recruiting

Basketball Recruiting

Database

Team Rankings

Player Rankings

Industry Comparison

Commitments

Recruiting Prediction Machine

Recruiting

High School News

Schools

High School Search

Rankings

High School Rankings

Scores

High School Scores

High School

NFL Draft

NFL Draft News

Draft By Stars

College Draft History

College Draft Totals

NBA Draft

NBA Draft News

Draft

NASCAR

Culture

Sports Betting

About

On3 App

Advertise

Press

Contact

Football

Basketball

Women's Basketball

Softball

Baseball

News

Deals

Recruits

Events

Newsletter

Alabama

Arizona State

Arizona

Arkansas

Auburn

Baylor

Boston College

California

Removed

Clemson

Colorado

Duke

Florida

Florida State

Georgia

Georgia Tech

Illinois

Indiana

Iowa

Iowa State

Kansas

Kansas State

Kentucky

Lettermen Row

Lettermen Lounge

Louisville

Maryland

Miami

Michigan State

Michigan

Minnesota

Mississippi State

Missouri

NC State

Nebraska

North Carolina

Northwestern

Notre Dame

Ohio State

Oklahoma

Oklahoma State

Ole Miss

The Main Board

Oregon

Oregon State

Penn State

Pittsburgh

Purdue

Rutgers

South Carolina

Stanford

Syracuse

Tennessee

Texas A&M

Texas

Texas Tech

UCLA

Utah

Vanderbilt

Virginia

Virginia Tech

Wake Forest

Washington

Washington State

West Virginia

Wisconsin

BamaOnLine

BOL Round Table

Inside Texas

IT Members Only

DawgsHQ

Dawg Walk

Scoop Duck

Recruiting & Sports

AuburnSports

The Corner

WeAreSC

GarryP's Trojan Huddle

The Wolverine

The Fort

The Lions Den

The Wolfpacker

The Wolves’ Den

GatorsOnline

Swamp Talk

Alabama A&M

Alabama State

Albany

Alcorn State

Abilene Christian

Appalachian State

Akron

Army

Austin Peay

Arkansas-Pine Bluff

Arkansas-Little Rock

Arkansas State

Air Force

Ball State

American

Wofford

Winthrop

Wisconsin-Milwaukee

Wisconsin-Green Bay

Wichita State

Western Carolina

Volleyball

Gymnastics

Men's Lacrosse

Women's Lacrosse

Men's Soccer

Women's Soccer

Women's Track

Men's Golf

Women's Golf

Men's Hockey

Women's Hockey

Men's Swimming

Women's Swimming

Wrestling

Men's Tennis

Women's Tennis

Annual $1

Annual Premium

Annual $1 

Monthly

Annual

Unlimited Access to This and All Articles.

Article (On3 Plus Rivals)

Forum (On3 Plus Rivals)

Would the NCAA's trust fund, NIL proposal ensure Title IX compliance?

AP Poll Prediction

Deion Sanders

Bracketology update

OSU hires OC

Instant Impact