I see no more compelling reason to predict a return to glory under this coach than under either of the previous two unless certain other coaches leave their current SEC jobs in short order, as in less than five years.Speaking of Tennessee... The new coach, Coach Caldwell is hitting the portal hot and heavy...she has signed 2 goodies that will help.
1tn.co/4b8wO1U ....Lazaria Spearman from Miami
1tn.co/3UxNWbV ....Ally Latham from Syracuse
UT will more than likely drop in the standings the first year but I doubt Caldwell will keep them down long. It is a harder road now with Carolina, LSU, Ole Miss, Bama, TX and OU...
It was expected. She gets to stay home and play for a team that will get a lot of exposure. Southern California needed a dominant big and she fits the bill. I still like our team over any other team in the country.Welp.The check cleared.
It worked out best for everyone involved, that is always a good thing.It was expected. She gets to stay home and play for a team that will get a lot of exposure. Southern California needed a dominant big and she fits the bill. I still like our team over any other team in the country.
Not necessarily. I think a lot of people would have been very happy to see her come here. She was the top player in the portal and you don't turn away a player with that kind of talent if she had wanted to come here. I think it was said earlier, maybe halfheartedly, that by getting her to be a Gamecock it would mean she wouldn't be a Trojan. SouCal will be trouble next year. Dawn would have found a way to get everyone satisfactory playing time. Plus any serious injury to one or two of our frontline players will be a big concern (UCONN anyone?). We have been very fortunate with injuries, or lack thereof, recently. Hence.......best for the Trojans but not for USC. I would loved to have seen here come here!!!It worked out best for everyone involved, that is always a good thing.
Clear-headedness over rationalization and denial - I like it.Not necessarily. I think a lot of people would have been very happy to see her come here. She was the top player in the portal and you don't turn away a player with that kind of talent if she had wanted to come here. I think it was said earlier, maybe halfheartedly, that by getting her to be a Gamecock it would mean she wouldn't be a Trojan. SouCal will be trouble next year. Dawn would have found a way to get everyone satisfactory playing time. Plus any serious injury to one or two of our frontline players will be a big concern (UCONN anyone?). We have been very fortunate with injuries, or lack thereof, recently. Hence.......best for the Trojans but not for USC. I would loved to have seen here come here!!!
I do myself, but it's like the time I asked one of my better-heeled acquaintances how much money would it take to satisfy him. His brief and immediate reply: "just a little bit more".It was expected. She gets to stay home and play for a team that will get a lot of exposure. Southern California needed a dominant big and she fits the bill. I still like our team over any other team in the country.
Absolutely. KI would have not only taken away minutes from Feagin next season, she would also have taken away minutes from Watkins and Edwards. Young players who are the foundation of future teams. Dawn isn't just trying to win national championship next season, she trying to win next season and the season after that and the season after that...she's playing the long game in an era when coaches are sacrificing their culture and future sucess for the possibility of improved results in the incoming season.I’m with @YankeeRooster … I think it’s best. Would have been exciting to have her but not at the expense of possibly losing one of our players. They have all been so patient and unselfish. We have all the pieces!
It is now being reported that TVO has committed too. That is 9 new players coming in. That’s insane. They will be very good if chemistry works.
I'm not sure that's a proper analogy. I think water is a better one: we need adequate water intake to stay properly hydrated to not only survive but to thrive. Water is a good thing. There is a point, however, when an overabundance of water is detrimental to our overall health.I do myself, but it's like the time I asked one of my better-heeled acquaintances how much money would it take to satisfy him. His brief and immediate reply: "just a little bit more".
So, using that rationale, adding this top-tier player would have proven somehow detrimental. The cost or benefit of the course not taken is never known with certainty one way or the other. I would have taken the "over", considering this player's proven excellence.I'm not sure that's a proper analogy. I think water is a better one: we need adequate water intake to stay properly hydrated to not only survive but to thrive. Water is a good thing. There is a point, however, when an overabundance of water is detrimental to our overall health...
I think it’s a risk either way. If Tac is somehow slow in her recovery that would make the additional resource more valuable.So, using that rationale, adding this top-tier player would have proven somehow detrimental. The cost or benefit of the course not taken is never known with certainty one way or the other. I would have taken the "over", considering this player's proven excellence.
Could not agree more, especially if we become mortal with respect to injuries.Not necessarily. I think a lot of people would have been very happy to see her come here. She was the top player in the portal and you don't turn away a player with that kind of talent if she had wanted to come here. I think it was said earlier, maybe halfheartedly, that by getting her to be a Gamecock it would mean she wouldn't be a Trojan. SouCal will be trouble next year. Dawn would have found a way to get everyone satisfactory playing time. Plus any serious injury to one or two of our frontline players will be a big concern (UCONN anyone?). We have been very fortunate with injuries, or lack thereof, recently. Hence.......best for the Trojans but not for USC. I would loved to have seen here come here!!!
You already responded to that post. lolCould not agree more, especially if we become mortal with respect to injuries.
And don't forget financial compensation. That's an additional factor to consider these days. I'm sure she will make more in SoCal than she would here since they are paying for a full-time player. Like you say, even if she were to ball out here, she'd still have to share minutes with other players.Not sure, even with a visit, we would have gotten a commitment. If a player is looking for a guaranteed spot or minutes, South Carolina is not the place. We have elite players in all positions. Everyone has to compete for playing time. This is Kiki's last year so she has to make it count.
He probably just wants to emphasize what a brilliant analysis that is!!!You already responded to that post. lol
I don't think she's been home for 24 hours since Cleveland. Where does she find the time?Dawn is such a fan of basketball. She is at the Sixers/Knicks Game going crazy.![]()
COST?Come see come saw. Sometimes the best move is to stay put. We have a great formula built through recruiting and player development. We have rarely used the portal and have been very selective when doing so. Yes Kiki would have been a coup but again, at what cost?
Purposely, and the more I think about it, the greater grows the likelihood I will respond to it again.You already responded to that post. lol
There you go. You nailed it, both before and just then.He probably just wants to emphasize what a brilliant analysis that is!!!![]()
Like a broken recordPurposely, and the more I think about it, the greater grows the likelihood I will respond to it again.
Cost is unity, cohesion and culture all being greater than money .COST?![]()
But impossible to quantify unless put to the test. It's also possible, depending on subsequent events, that we might have needed the value added. We'll know in less than a year.Cost is unity, cohesion and culture all being greater than money .
That attitude lead to the advent of the “Peter Principle. Keep advancing until there is failure, only o the team concept keep adding until the zero sum occurs.But impossible to quantify unless put to the test. It's also possible, depending on subsequent events, that we might have needed the value added. We'll know in less than a year.
You fail to consider team chemistry. If you recruit over a Feagin for example, in her senior season after she patiently sacrificed for three years for the team, you affect chemistry. Same for Chloe and Watkins. And Edwards didn’t need to sit and watch the entire season because we recruited a one year gunslinger. You seem to be enthralled by a star player who would come in for one year and take a front row seat ahead of those already here. That is the kind of stuff that could ruin a good culture.So, using that rationale, adding this top-tier player would have proven somehow detrimental. The cost or benefit of the course not taken is never known with certainty one way or the other. I would have taken the "over", considering this player's proven excellence.