The only for-sure loss on that schedule is Georgia. That's not to say we will go 7-1 but we have at least a puncher's chance in the other ones.
Brutal
So I’ll pencil you down for 7-5 (3-5) for 2024."All I see is 3 wins"********
As long as that pencil comes equipped with an eraser.So I’ll pencil you down for 7-5 (3-5) for 2024.
We are going to have some growing pains, so nobody is going to have a perfect schedule that they are completely happy with, but I do think you're right; this is a very eclectic schedule... without Alabama.I like it for the most part. It would have been nice to get an easy opponent in there somewhere. Overall it’s new teams and not the same old same old.
That was pretty lame.
Brutal
Agree. UGA and not playing BAMA is a wash. We lose to either no matter where played. Hard to say on all the others. What I do see is we will play @ AZState this year, BUT..... will not play them for the return game in Starkvegas..... IF.....we go to a 9 game SEC schedule in 2025. It's shocking to me that we, for the first time in my life time, will not play BAMA, AUB, or LSU. Almost hard to comprehend. Like all of a sudden........ no taxes and no death ahead to anticipate.That doesn't seem especially better or worse to me.
Agree the 2024 schedule is more favorable. We know we always lose to BAMA and UGA....so that's a wash. And lose most of the time to LSU. All the others it's hard to predict which ones will be the latest upstart teams. I see TN and TX as problematic. The rest are winnable if we play reasonably well. The 2024 home schedule has the possibility of us winning all 4 SEC contests.If you want to compare it to last years schedule…4 opponents are the same. 2024 has tenn texas fla and mizz. 2022 had bama lsu auburn and Kentucky. 2024 is easier.
I like our chances. When was the last time Ole Miss, Missouri, $&M, Texas, Florida and Arkansas were just too good to beat. Even Tenn going back 20 years have had only 7 seasons where they won more than 7 games, and 8 losing seasons. This schedule is the way it's going to be going forwards. Where we will get screwed is the following season where we will have to play one or two of those schools twice on the road.Yea, I didn’t understand everyone flipping out about playing Bama every year, because when you don’t this is what you get
You're assuming the P5 mandate goes away if we go to 9 games. That may or may not happen. Honestly, I hope we keep the P5 mandate. I like playing these games and I think they're good for the SEC and good for college football.UGA and not playing BAMA is a wash. We lose to either no matter where played. Hard to say on all the others. What I do see is we will play @ AZState this year, BUT..... will not play them for the return game in Starkvegas..... IF.....we go to a 9 game SEC schedule in 2025. It's shocking to me that we, for the first time in my life time, will not play BAMA, AUB, or LSU. Almost hard to comprehend. Like all of a sudden........ no taxes and no death ahead to anticipate.
Brutal
Texas is soft. I can’t wait to see our LBs smashing baby Manning and see their arrogant fans watching on in horror.Agree the 2024 schedule is more favorable. We know we always lose to BAMA and UGA....so that's a wash. And lose most of the time to LSU. All the others it's hard to predict which ones will be the latest upstart teams. I see TN and TX as problematic. The rest are winnable if we play reasonably well. The 2024 home schedule has the possibility of us winning all 4 SEC contests.
Yep those other home games are E. Ky (Aug 31), Utah St (Sept 14) , UMASS (Oct 19). Ahhhh yes, E. Ky on Aug 31 in Starkville @ 94' 98% humidity and an 11:00 kickoff. What more could a college football fan ask for, although, it could be worse I guess and hotter w/ a 3:00 kick offThat home schedule is bad from an attendance and Starkville economy standpoint.
Plus we’re @Tempe that season. Throw in 3 terrible non-conf opponents, and that could be the lowest attendance average we’ve had in many moons. None of those opposing fan bases will sell out their allotment.
I think p5 will remain. Part of the carrot to get ESPN to pay moreYou're assuming the P5 mandate goes away if we go to 9 games. That may or may not happen. Honestly, I hope we keep the P5 mandate. I like playing these games and I think they're good for the SEC and good for college football.
I think so too. What is going to get the most money out of ESPN? 14 games vs. teams like Troy St. or 14 games vs teams like Arizona St.?I think p5 will remain. Part of the carrot to get ESPN to pay more
Except, they kicked our *** last year.Last time we played Georgia, we gave them all they wanted with a roster smaller than my high school. If we catch them early enough with enough players suspended or in jail, we have a chance.
Georgia hasn't played at Kyle Field since A&M joined. Considering where Georgia is now vs where they were when A&M joined, I think A&M is ok with that..Another interesting observation.........Everybody it seems, plays either BAMA or UGA, however, Auburn and UT play both BAMA & UGA.........while TAMU doesn't play either one. So, it seems TAMU caught a pretty big break.
Not sure Texas is soft. They had BAMA beat last year until Bryce Young pulled a last minute rabbit out of his hat. Don't think Manning will be the starter either. They got 2 other QBs with more experience than him. He will see a lot of PT though.Texas is soft. I can’t wait to see our LBs smashing baby Manning and see their arrogant fans watching on in horror.
We have played Alabama more and anyone else in the SEC.We are Alabama's most common SEC opponent. LSU and Alabama rank as our 2-3rd most common SEC opponent. Times are a changing.
Not sure Texas is soft. They had BAMA beat last year until Bryce Young pulled a last minute rabbit out of his hat. Don't think Manning will be the starter either. They got 2 other QBs with more experience than him. He will see a lot of PT though.
Unless they got Vandy on their schedule (I haven't looked). Everybody's week off in the SEC is if they're lucky enough to get the Commodores on their schedule. If they don't have Vandy, then yes, pretty much no weeks off for everybody.Then it took a late TD to beat a bad ISU team .
Where Texas and OU will struggle is the "no weeks off" of the SEC schedule.
When A&M joined, all the aggies LOVED that they had the "Mississippi schools" on the schedule because they thought we were "easy wins where they could rest the starters".
They think differently now...
Do we all still play non conference games or have those all been cancelled.Unless they got Vandy on their schedule (I haven't looked). Everybody's week off in the SEC is if they're lucky enough to get the Commodores on their schedule. If they don't have Vandy, then yes, pretty much no weeks off for everybody.
I expect the trade-off for 9 games is going to be removing the P5/ND requirement, partially because we're probably 2-3 seasons away from the Power 5 no longer existing and partially because an extra conference game plus a strong OOC game decreases the chances of middle to lower SEC teams making a bowl.Do we all still play non conference games or have those all been cancelled.
Problem is, we’re probably not going to 9 games unless ESPN comes up with more money. And if they’re paying more money, they’re going to want to keep the P5 OOC games and lose the Troy St. games.I expect the trade-off for 9 games is going to be removing the P5/ND requirement, partially because we're probably 2-3 seasons away from the Power 5 no longer existing and partially because an extra conference game plus a strong OOC game decreases the chances of middle to lower SEC teams making a bowl.
But, yes, we'll still have OOC games, but after the move to 9 games, it will likely be a combo of 1 FCS, 1 Sun Belt, and 1 from AAC/MAC/CUSA with a rando MWC thrown in there from time to time. I expect existing contracts to still be honored (ASU, Minnesota, TTU, WSU), but I don't see us adding new P5 opponents. If you notice, State hasn't announced a future P5 opponent in 3 years and I don't expect them to any time soon.
Well… I get what you’re saying, but when we do a home and away with a Big Ten like Minnesota, that away game will 100% not appear on ESPN since the Big Ten will be divided between Fox, CBS, and NBC. We know Fox will get some Big 12 games and we have no idea what the Pac is going to look like, so outside of the ACC, there’s no guarantee a P5 OOC is going to even be on ESPN.Problem is, we’re probably not going to 9 games unless ESPN comes up with more money. And if they’re paying more money, they’re going to want to keep the P5 OOC games and lose the Troy St. games.
I think you may be on to something there. It’ll be very interesting to see how it plays out.Or better yet, are we going to reach a point where ESPN starts discouraging SEC-Big Ten matchups (or anything not guaranteed to land on ESPN) and pushes more ACC matchups? We’ve already seen this in basketball with ESPN killing the Big 12/SEC challenge and replacing it with the ACC/SEC challenge.
Texas had receivers that Bama couldn’t cover for sure but they lost one QB and damn near lost another. They played a good game against Bama at home but I don’t have faith that they will hold up for a twelve game season.Not sure Texas is soft. They had BAMA beat last year until Bryce Young pulled a last minute rabbit out of his hat. Don't think Manning will be the starter either. They got 2 other QBs with more experience than him. He will see a lot of PT though.
View attachment 351920
Didn’t do Ole Miss any favors either. That home schedule is brutal and no gimmies on the road either."
And for us "gray hairs," the final 4 games of 1986 still give some PTSD. After racing out to 6-1, the final games were a true murderers' row:And no Auburn...for you youngsters at one time it was Alabama, Auburn, LSU and OM...called the November Nightmare. This is a relief.