Not that I'll read any lenghty stuff but what criteria was used to determine ranking, in a nutshell?
This warranted a second thread? Why not put it in the original post, it's says the say damn thing
Be careful…Scottfield1 takes offense if you claim State is at the bottom of a ranking. He might start calling you names. Lol!
That is objectively incorrect. Even the typical business degrees from state schools pay off exponentially, compared to the mean and median incomes for not getting a degree. This was true in the early 00's, was true after the recession in the '10s, and data post-pandemic still shows it.Unless it is a very specific degree PE, EE, Accounting, Architecture, etc… a college degree is a poor investment nowadays.
A recent report that was financially supported by Vanderbilt University and conducted by NORC at the University of Chicago—a highly respected independent and nonpartisan nonprofit research organization—shows that the ranking’s methodologies have the potential to mislead and misinform the students who rely on it.
Last year, I wrote a piece for Inside Higher Ed about why the ranking is problematic. From flawed methodologies to low-quality data to subjective standards, college rankings make it harder for students to find the right school. Complicating things further, U.S. News & World Report has changed the methodologies for most of its rankings over the past several years, including the Best Colleges rankings.
What we need is not a rankings system but a ratings system: a way to quantify key measures of academic quality and accessibility that is stable, data-driven, and transparent. And we need to be able to apply this ratings system to every institution, public and private, in the country.
Because somebody is trying to make sure everyone knows about this.**. Rabble rabble rabbleThis warranted a second thread? Why not put it in the original post, it's says the say damn thing
That is objectively incorrect. Even the typical business degrees from state schools pay off exponentially, compared to the mean and median incomes for not getting a degree. This was true in the early 00's, was true after the recession in the '10s, and data post-pandemic still shows it.
There's a hundred different ways to look at it. But bottom line, the assertion that a lot of morons are pushing these days is, almost, that you're better off without a degree. That's pretty dishonest at minimum.I was going to say you would have a hard time finding data to support the assertion that college is not worth it in general.
On an individual level, you may have circumstances that change the math on it. You could possibly make the case that it’s not worth it if you have to take on debt, but I don’t think the numbers bear that out either.
The funniest part of this is 615 was asked why he always talks about these rankings in the other thread he started on them. His response lifted directly from the other thread:You started a thread on this same issue, why start another negative thread. Future athletes and students and their families read these boards. Why push negative narratives so much?
If you really believe that and are a MSU graduate, you’re a prime example of 615’s arguments regarding Keenum not doing a good job when it comes to MSU’s academics.Unless it is a very specific degree PE, EE, Accounting, Architecture, etc… a college degree is a poor investment nowadays.
MITOkay, I guessed I missed it, who is #2 ??