Are Keenum and Selmon intentionally wrecking MSU Football?

patdog

Well-known member
May 28, 2007
49,750
14,323
113
No. That source has pretty much always been right. Now could we have done got a better position guy to take it? The source never mentioned that. I took that one way. Y'all can take it anyway you want to. That's the problem with firing the guy. It's going to cost at least two million, and there is absolutely no guarantee we will do any better. The odds are high we won't.
At this point it doesn't make sense to fire anyone. Looking at next year's schedule and players we have returning (even assuming they all return), next year is a lost cause. May as well wait till the buyouts are one year cheaper.
 

OG Goat Holder

Well-known member
Sep 30, 2022
8,725
8,238
113
No. That source has pretty much always been right. Now could we have done got a better position guy to take it? The source never mentioned that. I took that one way. Y'all can take it anyway you want to. That's the problem with firing the guy. It's going to cost at least two million, and there is absolutely no guarantee we will do any better. The odds are high we won't.
The fact that you're on here talking about "sources" shows just how not in the know you are. Even if you had a source, how could you prove it, and why would you prove it, to a bunch of randoms on the internet? And do any of us care? Nope. Everyone who knows any real secrets about the AD keeps it secret anyway, as to not out their own "sources".

You take yourself too seriously, boss.
 

Dawgzilla2

Well-known member
Oct 9, 2022
1,025
1,146
113
Keenum knows from personal experience that the President's job is much easier when the football program is doing acceptably well. While the football team may be sucking up more and more donor money, having a BAD football team is even more of a financial disaster for the University.

We can argue over his decisions and priorities, but he isn't stupid.

That said, the shelf life of a good University President is less than 10 years. It may be time for him to move on.
 

DesotoCountyDawg

Well-known member
Nov 16, 2005
23,075
11,279
113
By comparison Ole Miss is 132 million in the hole but when you include state funding they are in the positive (along with State as well)

I looked up Auburn just to see, just strictly on revenue and expenses they 315 million in the hole and their state funding gets them back in the black as well.
 

patdog

Well-known member
May 28, 2007
49,750
14,323
113

The Cooterpoot

Well-known member
Sep 29, 2022
4,538
7,513
113
Well, he pushed for the 12 team playoff, and was essential to getting it done. He carries a lot of weight in the college football world. I know that's not what the narrative here says, but it is the truth. He is respected and listened to. I would argue that that's a very good thing to have in our side right now.
He carries as much weight in college football as a rat turd. That's why the SEC has stuck us with UGA the last few years even after AL falls off and then kicks us in the nuts with the toughest schedule in college football for two years. So much respect!
 

L4Dawg

Well-known member
Oct 27, 2016
7,026
4,167
113
He carries as much weight in college football as a rat turd. That's why the SEC has stuck us with UGA the last few years even after AL falls off and then kicks us in the nuts with the toughest schedule in college football for two years. So much respect!
You don't know what you are talking about.
 
  • Like
Reactions: randystewart

L4Dawg

Well-known member
Oct 27, 2016
7,026
4,167
113
The fact that you're on here talking about "sources" shows just how not in the know you are. Even if you had a source, how could you prove it, and why would you prove it, to a bunch of randoms on the internet? And do any of us care? Nope. Everyone who knows any real secrets about the AD keeps it secret anyway, as to not out their own "sources".

You take yourself too seriously, boss.
You have ZERO self-awareness.
 

The Cooterpoot

Well-known member
Sep 29, 2022
4,538
7,513
113
The move from BI to the EF for your NIL now also takes your money out of your control as to the sport it goes toward. Guess which sport has really been recruiting lights out suddenly.
 

Maroon Eagle

Well-known member
May 24, 2006
16,729
5,846
102
Ha - probably the only thing attractive about working there
Exactly.

No smrat ($1) guy would move to Starkvegas unless there was a guarantee of a viable pension/retirement plan.

No biologist wants to move to a roach motel— they want to get out if possible.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mr. Cook

ronpolk

Well-known member
May 6, 2009
8,273
2,909
113
Where is the proof that says they ,at the very least, they aren’t intentionally holding back the football program?
What would qualify as proof for you?

I’ll admit I’m operating on common sense here, which does at times seem to be at a premium around here, but most people want to do a good job at their job. And most people who are highly paid want to continue to be highly paid, which keenum and selmon are. Lastly, I’m not sure how doing a ****** job helps selmon move on and I guarantee you he wants to move on. Selmon didn’t take this job with aspirations of being the AD here long term.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sandwolf.sixpack

ronpolk

Well-known member
May 6, 2009
8,273
2,909
113
randystewart speaks truth.

We're facing quite the crisis in the next few years and it extends well beyond football. The push for an A+ gameday experience is more important than wins and losses. We have to attract students. Our 17ed up scholarship matrix has to be fixed, but if students don't want to come to State because the experience is more boring than their high school, we're going to have trouble paying for a lot of things.

The university is running at a $234 million operating loss. 63% of our outflows are salaries and benefits (over $500 million). The university has $312 million in debt and $623 million in pension liabilities. MSU is going to have to make some tough decisions soon.




I’m not a CPA and not a public finance expert but I’m pretty sure that $623 million pension liability is not an obligation of MSU. I think every state government entity carries this “pension liability”. I believe it represents the pro-rata share of the state of Mississippi’s unfunded pension liability. So, essentially whatever the unfunded pension liability that PERS has, $623 million of this is attributed to MSU employees or past employees. MSU will not be responsible for that.

I could be way wrong about that. Maybe a CPA can correct me if so.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DawgFan69420

patdog

Well-known member
May 28, 2007
49,750
14,323
113
I’m not a CPA and not a public finance expert but I’m pretty sure that $623 million pension liability is not an obligation of MSU. I think every state government entity carries this “pension liability”. I believe it represents the pro-rata share of the state of Mississippi’s unfunded pension liability. So, essentially whatever the unfunded pension liability that PERS has, $623 million of this is attributed to MSU employees or past employees. MSU will not be responsible for that.

I could be way wrong about that. Maybe a CPA can correct me if so.
Technically legally correct. It’s an obligation of the State of Mississippi. But it will be paid from pension contributions from participating employers. It’s carried as a liability on the MSU balance sheet because MSU will pay it. Had this argument with an angry client once. Tried explaining it to him but finally just had to say that’s the rule & there’s nothing either one of us can do about it.
 

Trojanbulldog19

Well-known member
Aug 25, 2014
9,170
4,719
113
Cohen was the worst athletic director we have ever had, including LT. He only cared about baseball and is THE person to blame for our current football predicament. Again, I'm laughing at you.
Both can be true. Cohen made some terrible moves but he usually made up for it correcting it. Now the fan experience and money side he didn't get. I though t when we hired Selmon he would understand but he appears to have gotten to where he is due to his OU family because it doesn't appear money or fan experience have gotten much better but his coaching hire appears to be going south. We will see with Zimmerman. He has sat on his hands with Lemon. If lemon had a bad year again then we know Selmon doesn't have the cahones to make the right moves or is just incompetent. I would honestly be talking to Benko or Weatherbee. But I don't trust Keenum to do it. He is too busy with national committee stuff.
 
  • Like
Reactions: patdog

L4Dawg

Well-known member
Oct 27, 2016
7,026
4,167
113
Both can be true. Cohen made some terrible moves but he usually made up for it correcting it. Now the fan experience and money side he didn't get. I though t when we hired Selmon he would understand but he appears to have gotten to where he is due to his OU family because it doesn't appear money or fan experience have gotten much better but his coaching hire appears to be going south. We will see with Zimmerman. He has sat on his hands with Lemon. If lemon had a bad year again then we know Selmon doesn't have the cahones to make the right moves or is just incompetent. I would honestly be talking to Benko or Weatherbee. But I don't trust Keenum to do it. He is too busy with national committee stuff.
Money has evidently got quite a bit better, but we are starting from a very low base.
 

L4Dawg

Well-known member
Oct 27, 2016
7,026
4,167
113
Technically legally correct. It’s an obligation of the State of Mississippi. But it will be paid from pension contributions from participating employers. It’s carried as a liability on the MSU balance sheet because MSU will pay it. Had this argument with an angry client once. Tried explaining it to him but finally just had to say that’s the rule & there’s nothing either one of us can do about it.
The op on this stuff made things out to be terrible when they really aren't. Whether that was intentional or not I don't know. He has been called on it by multiple people.
 

L4Dawg

Well-known member
Oct 27, 2016
7,026
4,167
113
What would qualify as proof for you?

I’ll admit I’m operating on common sense here, which does at times seem to be at a premium around here, but most people want to do a good job at their job. And most people who are highly paid want to continue to be highly paid, which keenum and selmon are. Lastly, I’m not sure how doing a ****** job helps selmon move on and I guarantee you he wants to move on. Selmon didn’t take this job with aspirations of being the AD here long term.
EXACTLY
 

615dawg

Well-known member
Jun 4, 2007
5,591
1,276
113
I understand that the taxpayers of Mississippi make up the difference, but the current administration is taking advantage of that. We are spending like drunken sailors and the enrollment cliff is coming in 2026. Terrible football isn't going to help with that.

Six of our public universities in Mississippi would fold if not for state funding. We aren't far off from being the seventh. We have to be close to self sufficient by 2030 because of the train that's coming down the track.

Too many of our people think Keenum is doing a great job. They see him as head of the College Football Playoff committee and equate that to great leadership. It's not. Mississippi State is facing a crossroads in the next decade. We are R1, but lost that temporarily. Heads should have rolled the day we lost that. I know we got it back but that was a major embarrassment for the academic side that it will take 50 years to recover from (see US News rankings)

The simplest thing we can do is create a student experience on par with the rest of the SEC.
 

randystewart

Active member
Jan 14, 2009
1,106
123
63
There is just no way that people can be this stupid. He is literally THE CHAIRMAN of the College Football Playoff Board.
He carries as much weight in college football as a rat turd. That's why the SEC has stuck us with UGA the last few years even after AL falls off and then kicks us in the nuts with the toughest schedule in college football for two years. So much respect!y
 

HuntDawg

Well-known member
Oct 25, 2018
2,901
1,404
113
Its funny that there is someone on this thread that cries SOURCE and NAME... everytime someone posts... but he cant produce his SOURCE or any NAMES either.

FYI: "My source" isnt a source.
 

johnson86-1

Well-known member
Aug 22, 2012
12,505
2,755
113
I heard essentially what was posted by someone else above, and what I've been posting for a month. We had real trouble getting anyone to take it. ALL of the established coordinators wouldn't really even talk to us. That's why we wound up with what we did for the price we paid. It was known what we had to work with.
There is just a **** ton of a vast sea of expanse between established "established coordinators" and Hutzler. If we went with a special teams coordinator with no play calling experience over good G5 coordinators, that is just stupid with a first time head coach. If you already have an established head coach, sure, a P5 position coach may be a good option, even without play calling experience. But you don't throw $3M at somebody that has never called plays when you have a first time head coach.
 

johnson86-1

Well-known member
Aug 22, 2012
12,505
2,755
113
I’m not a CPA and not a public finance expert but I’m pretty sure that $623 million pension liability is not an obligation of MSU. I think every state government entity carries this “pension liability”. I believe it represents the pro-rata share of the state of Mississippi’s unfunded pension liability. So, essentially whatever the unfunded pension liability that PERS has, $623 million of this is attributed to MSU employees or past employees. MSU will not be responsible for that.

I could be way wrong about that. Maybe a CPA can correct me if so.
The number is calculated so there is information as to who gets stuck how badly when we can no longer pretend those obligations are going to get paid. I wouldn't worry about it too much because it's going to be such a giant **** show when we finally have to face reality that I'm not sure who is responsible for what is going to matter much at all compared to who has money and who has political clout. And there is also going to be the Contracts clause issue when we try to be realistic.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ronpolk

Trojanbulldog19

Well-known member
Aug 25, 2014
9,170
4,719
113
Money has evidently got quite a bit better, but we are starting from a very low base.
Perhaps but the return on investment right now is even lower. Right now giving to all of these funds and being asked to give more with current results fills like used car salesman right now or throwing money into a pit and lighting it on fire
 

aTotal360

Well-known member
Nov 12, 2009
19,366
8,768
113
This has a very LT feel. LT’s goal was to work for the SEC and continuously wrecked MSU Football to appease the SEC and eventually led to him getting his SEC job. Keenum is a lifelong Bureaucrat. Bureaucrats have a goal to get titles and buildings,bridges, highways named after them to achieve some level of immortality. They thrive when they are leaders of committees and look to advance their own personal agenda.
The wrecking of MSU Football is almost too intentional to be blamed on incompetence.
Yesterday: This guy is a moron.

Today: You might be onto something…
 
  • Like
Reactions: gtowndawg

Trojanbulldog19

Well-known member
Aug 25, 2014
9,170
4,719
113
Good grief. This board needs an enema.
Give one example just one that is actually quantifiable of having Keenum on the cfp board that helps msu in football. Is it making us money? Is it bringing us s better AD or coach? Is it helping our schedule? Is it brining in recruits? Is it helping our bulldog club or NIL? How does it actually directly benefit MSU?
 
  • Like
Reactions: jacksondawg20

L4Dawg

Well-known member
Oct 27, 2016
7,026
4,167
113
Give one example just one that is actually quantifiable of having Keenum on the cfp board that helps msu in football. Is it making us money? Is it bringing us s better AD or coach? Is it helping our schedule? Is it brining in recruits? Is it helping our bulldog club or NIL? How does it actually directly benefit MSU?
I guess you would rather not have him being so respected in this rapidly changing landscape? We have a voice, a big one, at the table right now. And y'all want to run him off. It makes you wonder.
 

gtowndawg

Active member
Jan 23, 2007
1,964
130
63
Give one example just one that is actually quantifiable of having Keenum on the cfp board that helps msu in football. Is it making us money? Is it bringing us s better AD or coach? Is it helping our schedule? Is it brining in recruits? Is it helping our bulldog club or NIL? How does it actually directly benefit MSU?
I've had the same question. I'm open to hearing how this benefits us but so far all I see is how it benefits him.
 
Get unlimited access today.

Pick the right plan for you.

Already a member? Login