Can it be argued this will be the most important game for Penn State since the 1987 championship game this coming Saturday?
- Thread starter dcf4psu
- Start date
It hardly matters -because if we lose it will be the coaches' fault, and if we win it will be some kind of fluke not to be credited to the coaches.
This is the correct answer (for the we’re just happy to be playing at or around the standard set by PSU’s winningest coach who was from a time before indoor plumbing). It’s an outstanding perspective that ensures happiness win or lose.
It depends. who we are playing?
is it 15 on 11 to borrow a phrase from a writer or 11 on 11?
You can argue it but I think that it’ll fall into the recency bias category. Is it bigger than…
1992 vs Miami?
1994 at Michigan?
1997 vs Michigan (battle of undefeateds)?
2008 at Iowa (after having whacked OSU on road)?
2016 vs Wisky in Big Ten Champ Game?
1992 vs Miami?
1994 at Michigan?
1997 vs Michigan (battle of undefeateds)?
2008 at Iowa (after having whacked OSU on road)?
2016 vs Wisky in Big Ten Champ Game?
It’s the most important game this week. And that is all that matters.
A close loss to Michigan, the big one, might turn Franklin into this century’s Tom Osborne.
Thinking of 1994 I think the the win at Illinois was more significant than beating Michigan, but that's just my opinion.
If you just started watching Penn State football this past Saturday at 3:20 pm, yes.
Otherwise, I don’t see it.
OL
Otherwise, I don’t see it.
OL
All signals to be in pig Latin to confuse M.
Attachments
-
IMG_2215.jpeg
9+2=11. Penn State has played 12 regular season games since at least 2006.
I could live with that if we were awarded a Natty despite some other team deserving it.
You maths guys would be a universal joke if someone hadn’t found, discovered, invented or created the “0” to bail you out.
From a pre-game point of view, has to be the UM game. The ‘93 team had similar words spoken about them as last (and so far this) years’ versions.
Get unlimited access today.