We heard plenty of that before last season didn't we?Has anyone actually called for 8 wins? Much less 10?
We heard plenty of that before last season didn't we?Has anyone actually called for 8 wins? Much less 10?
How? If you don’t think in 2022 we had the roster to win 10 games that year then you actually don’t know what you’re watching. You don’t beat two top 10 teams and be trash. The Oc held us back until Beamer had enough of it. Simple.This must be sarcasm
UK is not a win. Not by a long shot.For us to get 8 wins would mean getting 4 wins from: UK, Mizzou, Ole Miss, A&M, LSU, Bama, OU and Clemson.
Let's call UK a win. Where in the other 7 games do fans see us getting 3 wins?
UK is not a win. Not by a long shot.
We have to beat UK for any shot at a bowl game. Any path to more than 4 wins goes through UK. If we lose that game, the rest of the season is academic. We will be guaranteed of no better than 4-8.
Some our fans keep mentioning Mizzou as a possible upset win as well, but I'm not sure why. They absolutely own us right now.
They are well coached and return a lot of talentThese have a different feel though. I dunno. Even while we were losing to UK, I never felt like they were REALLY that much better than us, which is what made it extra frustrating. Mizzou just appears to be flat-out better though.
There's no reason why this program can't be successful
It's simply mind boggling.There must be at least one reason. We've been trying for 130+ years and we've had 4 really good seasons (10+ wins). We have something like a 0.3% success rate. You can't fail as much as we have failed based on pure luck.
We had 2 hall-of-fame coaches back-to-back who could not really breathe life into the program.
Notably, we've never had a coach leave here to go on successfully coach anywhere else. It's called the place where coaches go to die for a reason.
It's simply mind boggling.
and unfortunately we have the State legislature.We have SEC money.
We have a rabid fan base.
We have great facilities.
We are positioned in a talent rich region.
It's really a testimony to our ineptitude that we have failed to find even moderate maintained success.
Notably, we've never had a coach leave here to go on successfully coach anywhere else. It's called the place where coaches go to die for a reason.
Sparky Woods had a chance to break the streak. He was the first to actually get a head coaching job after leaving SC, albeit was 15 years after his termination at SC when he hired by VMI. He compiled a 17–62 record in his 6 years there before being let go on 2014.
This could be the year of reckoning for Beamer. If their predictions are correct, he'll most likely have an overall record of 24-26 at the end of this season.
With a meh recruiting class lined up for '25.
I think the losing season has a lot to do with that meh class. Follow it up with another? He is definitely on the hot seat come season 5, which is never good for recruiting.
Spot on, my friend. That being said, I'm not sure he is anything special as a recruiter. Muschamp had better classes.I think the losing season has a lot to do with that meh class. Follow it up with another? He is definitely on the hot seat come season 5, which is never good for recruiting.
Have the former players who pushed for Beamer to be hired, ever been identified?There's a possibility the die may have been cast. Last season was bad, contributing to our ugly '25 recruiting class. Unless we drastically out-perform expectations this year, I don't see us turning it around much. If this season goes how most think it will (with even optimistic fans seeing 6 wins as the ceiling), I think him being canned after '25 is academic.
It's going to be very difficult to right the ship with 3* recruits. Maybe impossible.
Hypothetically we go 5-7 this year. Let's say Beamer goes 6-6 and wins a bowl in '25. Does that save his job?Spot on, my friend. That being said, I'm not sure he is anything special as a recruiter. Muschamp had better classes.
NO!!!!!! Let me just say this: it better not.Hypothetically we go 5-7 this year. Let's say Beamer goes 6-6 and wins a bowl in '25. Does that save his job?
NO!!!!!! Let me just say this: it better not.
My view is that if the best a coach in his 5th season can do is 7-6, very mediocre, I just don't think that is acceptable. It not only sends a poor message to recruits, it sends a message to the other sports at USC that mediocrity will keep you employed.Can a school in our position fire a coach who just won a bowl game?
on the other hand
Do we want to send the signal to recruits that 7-5 is the standard for success?
Most teams don’t play in the same year Alabama (#5 - #7), Mizzou (#8 - #8), Ole Miss (#9 - #6), LSU (#12 - #14), OU (#15 - #18) and Clemson (#20 - #16) and UK ( NA - #23) and Texas A&M (NA - #25) (2023 final rankings - 2024 pre-season rankings). Yes, I know, there is no crying in SEC Football. At least we don’t have to also play pre-season #1 Georgia or #15 Tennessee as well. Are there any other unranked teams that play 8 pre-season top 25 teams this year?Most 4-8 teams actually suck. Maybe all of them do.
How have Ole Miss and Missouri become so good by their coaches 4th seasons there? Both were Top 10 teams in Kiffin's and Drinkwitz' 4th seasons last year. Beamer is going into his 4th season here this year. Why not us? Ole Miss beat Penn State and LSU last year. Missouri beat Ohio State last year. I'm not saying Beamer should produce a Top 10 team in his 4th season. But damn, we are talking of only winning 4-6 games in his 4th season here. The bar has been set pretty low for Beamer.Most teams don’t play in the same year Alabama (#5 - #7), Mizzou (#8 - #8), Ole Miss (#9 - #6), LSU (#12 - #14), OU (#15 - #18) and Clemson (#20 - #16) and UK ( NA - #23) and Texas A&M (NA - #25) (2023 final rankings - 2024 pre-season rankings). Yes, I know, there is no crying in SEC Football. At least we don’t have to also play pre-season #1 Georgia or #15 Tennessee as well. Are there any other unranked teams that play 8 pre-season top 25 teams this year?
How have Ole Miss and Missouri become so good by their coaches 4th seasons there? Both were Top 10 teams in Kiffin's and Drinkwitz' 4th seasons last year. Beamer is going into his 4th season here this year. Why not us?
And Missouri, in Drinkwitz, 4th season beat Ohio State. And Kiffin in his 4th season beat LSU and Penn State. I'm not saying that Beamer should produce a Top 10 team in his 4th season like Drinkwitz and Kiffin did in their 4th seasons last year. But, damn, we are talking about Beamer winning 4-6 games in his 4th season here and saying, "That's OK Shane". The bar has been set VERY low for Beamer. That's ridiculous. What am I missing?Mizzou is what really kills me. They are historically a bit better than us, but they're not anywhere near blue blood status. First we got 5-peated by UK and now by Mizzou. It's understandable of the UGAs, Bamas and UTs of the world 5-peat us, but Mizzou and UK?
And Missouri, in Drinkwitz, 4th season beat Ohio State. And Kiffin in his 4th season beat LSU and Penn State. I'm not saying that Beamer should produce a Top 10 team in his 4th season like Drinkwitz and Kiffin did in their 4th seasons last year. But, damn, we are talking about Beamer winning 4-6 games in his 4th season here and saying . "That's OK Shane". The bar has been set VERY low for Beamer. That's ridiculous. What am I missing?
Tough schedule is not an excuse. Every team in the SEC has a tough schedule. We need to either get out of it, or except 6–7-win seasons with a very occasional 8–9-win season
We almost always grab an upset but then we have our stupid losses. It seems less common that one of USC’s upsets actually turns into a net gain in wins.I guess they just don't count on any upsets. I think we grab one, but wonder if we can pull 2.
We almost always grab an upset but then we have our stupid losses. It seems less common that one of USC’s upsets actually turns into a net gain in wins.
I don't count UK as a win but it is the one that we are most likely to win, out of those teams. I am honestly struggling to see us beating any of those other teams, don't know much about A&M but it's a home game, so I think that's our 2nd best chance other than UK.For us to get 8 wins would mean getting 4 wins from: UK, Mizzou, Ole Miss, A&M, LSU, Bama, OU and Clemson.
Let's call UK a win. Where in the other 7 games do fans see us getting 3 wins?
I honestly don't get on here much anymore, so can't say they have on here, but I would imagine there are a few. That said, on other sites there are plenty! Again, not as many as last year though.Has anyone actually called for 8 wins? Much less 10?
Thankfully we are not in that dying conference. Holtz produced one Top 20 and one Top 15 team. Spurrier produced 3 Top 10 teams. The right Head Coach can make SC respectable and nationally relevant.We belong in the ACC.
But we want to win really badly.UK is not a win. Not by a long shot.