They could eat poo or a Primanti's sandwich. Same thing.I've definitely met some yinzers that would chow down on a little poo after enough Arn citys and a stiller super bowl.
They could eat poo or a Primanti's sandwich. Same thing.I've definitely met some yinzers that would chow down on a little poo after enough Arn citys and a stiller super bowl.
A win in two weeks would do that for him. Also, I’m glad people have stopped saying that his arm strength isn’t NFL caliber.I don’t think Jalen Hurts will ever silence his critics
Exactly.... His super bowl performance 2 years ago was amazing. Even Mahomes said Hurts should be the MVP of the Super Bowl but for some it will never be enough.I don’t think Jalen Hurts will ever silence his critics
Who else learned that the officials can grant a TD to a team after repeated infractions by the defense? Crazy rule.
So, who gets credit for the TD (sports bettors want to know)?
Can the offense refuse? The defense could do this to force the TD and get the ball back without running clock.
Who else learned that the officials can grant a TD to a team after repeated infractions by the defense? Crazy rule.
So, who gets credit for the TD (sports bettors want to know)?
Can the offense refuse? The defense could do this to force the TD and get the ball back without running clock.
Good point on the injury potential. Almost gets into unnecessary roughness territory.It is a crazy rule. I had heard of it, but as it's never been called/awarded, I've never seen it applied. (I did post a nice article about it earlier in this thread.)
Good question as to who gets credit for the TD.
Also a good point about how a defense could use it to force a TD to get the ball back.
My buddy and I were texting about another issue with that sequence. Hurts could have been seriously injured. The Commander landed on his back the 1st time he came flying over, and nearly did the same the 2nd time. I'm not sure what the tweak should be in the rules, but a team should not be able to get an advantage to that degree (injure a star on the other team) but blatantly violating a rule, with nothing more than a PF being called (and as the ref said, they warned the Commanders after that it could be called on the next instance after the individual had done it 2 times, so doing it once on purpose and injuring a player isn't currently a PF?).
Yes, I was very unhappy with that bs yesterday.Good point on the injury potential. Almost gets into unnecessary roughness territory.
Unhappy with the call or unhappy that your player was putting players at risk of injury?Yes, I was very unhappy with that bs yesterday.
The only other time I know of that the rule was used in football was in the 1954 Cotton Bowl. A player for Rice was clear running down the sideline for a TD, and an Alabama player came off the sideline and tackled him. The referees awarded a TD on the play.Who else learned that the officials can grant a TD to a team after repeated infractions by the defense? Crazy rule.
So, who gets credit for the TD (sports bettors want to know)?
Can the offense refuse? The defense could do this to force the TD and get the ball back without running clock.
Dude, where did you pull that from? Impressive. I wonder if that rule was in place in 1954 (or the refs just went with a logical decision) and if it still exists in college football today. I'm kind of surprised it hasn't happened again. {EDIT: Funny, I'm listening to the Gill Alexander show and they just brought this up. Maybe it's going around Twitter}.The only other time I know of that the rule was used in football was in the 1954 Cotton Bowl. A player for Alabama was clear running down the sideline for a TD, and a Rice player came off the sideline and tackled him. The referees awarded a TD on the play.
There was talk that it potentially could have been called against the Steelers a few years ago in a game where a kick (or maybe it was punt) returner was coming down the sideline and Tomlin almost made contact with him.
I remembered it was the 1954 Cotton Bowl and it was Rice/Alabama, but I had to go back and edit my post because I messed up which team it was that did it. My wife will tell you that I have a photographic memory when it comes to random crap, sports facts, 90s music, etc...but you'll probably have to remind me 4 times to do a load of laundry or call someone on their birthday.Dude, where did you pull that from? Impressive. I wonder if that rule was in place in 1954 (or the refs just went with a logical decision) and if it still exists in college football today. I'm kind of surprised it hasn't happened again.
The latter. You had to ask? This was pretty bush league, I had to turn away back to my math problems to get my head straight.Unhappy with the call or unhappy that your player was putting players at risk of injury?